how to loose friends and alienate people

Well, this was poor.

Loose friends was actually somethign I listened to as an audiobook and enjoyed quite a lot.  It was an odd sort of enjoyment, though.

See, the thing about it was that the person described in the book - Toby Young - was a bit of a prat.  But here's the thing - the book was written with sufficient hindsight and self knowledge (by Toby Young himself) that it made it enjoyable.

Young portrays himself during that period as a prat, fully acknowledging his prattishness and making fun of himself.  It's not entirely a self piss-take, but there's a definite air of "what the hell was I playing at?" to it that means it's enjoyable.

And it's difficult to see how the book would work without that, because it's also central to the reason he failed in New York.  Well, actually, central to both the reason he got the opportunity and then failed was that he wasn't really willing to play the game proper.

He starts off attacking what he loves because he loves it, but then when that thing tries to brign him onboard instead of flipping and playign the game, he does the opposite.  But he thinks that bu doing so he will have even more success, where in reality he creates his own failure.

Guess what happens in the film?

Well, for starters, a lot of it is toned down - the attack isn't really there, as such.  But also the point of the book is flipped on its head - he flips aroudn and plays the game and has success.  But in the film (this isn't really a spoiler, as it's predictably hollywood) he then realises his mistake and gives it all up for love.

It's almost the complete opposite fo what the book was about and therefore it renders the title pointles.  They could easily have made this film, called it somethign else and not been sued.

The other problem si that a lot fo the humour descends into the toilet.  Now don't get me wrong there's some rudeness and crudeness int he original, but it's liek those are the only bits they wanted to keep.  Also, without a lot of the more complicated and interesting things they loose some of their point, so they're just vomit, transvestism and cock & ball jokes.

To be honest, though, it's difficult to see how they would have made a film of the book as it was.  At least, it's difficult to see how a reasonable budget Hollywood film would have gotten made without drastic revisions.  A small, indipendent film maybe, but a film with the need to get quite a lot of bums in seats to pay for itself?  A tough sell.