Last weekend I went to the Farnborough Air Show.
I was actually hoping to have put together some pics but I just haven't had time (more on that next week).
Having lived and worked in and around this area for around 13 years I've never been to Farnborough. Well, I've been to Farnborough, but I've never been to the air show. In my defence a while back it did become bi-annual. However, with my imminent switch of profession I figured I should go.
It was really rather good, if long and tiring. It was pretty good value overall, though - the tickets were expensive (£40 on the door) but you got good value.
I have to say I wasn't expecting it to be so... big. I've been to air shows before - Biggin Hill in particular - and the focus is pretty squarely on the air displays. There are usually two types - ones where they basically just fly about and the others where they do proper displays.
Okay, both are proper displays and are planned out in detail, but what I mean is that in the former they run the aircraft through a few things it can do, but in the aerobatic displays they do tricks and put on a deliberately complex "show". I'm sure you get what I mean. And of course some of the fighters are able to do clever things, so it's not really a hard and fast line.
There was a nice blend of the two. In particular there was a focus some of the more unusual and distinctive aircraft for the basic displays and then they had really good aerobatics. They key was that there was a nice mix of the two.
Particular highlights included the Osprey, which is the new tilt-rotor. It's really big, which I wasn't expecting and looks weird in either "mode". When the rotors are up it looks like a Chinook they accidentally built sideways and when they're down it looks like a plane where they forgot to put the wings on. The rotors are enormous - each blade is more than 30 feet long.
Another highlight was the A380, which is just bonkers huge. You almost can't believe it will get into the air, but it actually took off in quite a short distance. It also did a really slow pass where it just seems to defy gravity.
They also had a "functional" display for the Tornado where they pretended to blow stuff up on the runway, but the bangs were really loud and made everyone jump a few times.
The F18 Super Hornet was also quite impressive - I didn't really know much about it before, but it's a really agile aircraft. And of course there were the Red Arrows who did a full display and were very impressive. It's been a while since I've seen them do a full display.
But I mentioned it being big - there were a huge number (something like 80-odd) aircraft on display. I got there pretty early and went around and saw most of them. This was where I discovered my first cock-up.
When I'd packed my bag I'd done my favourite trick of packing too much so it was heavy. I therefore dumped a few things and one of these was my spare camera battery. I'd recharged (or so I thought) them the night before and figured one battery would last.
Trouble was as soon as I started using it the battery reported being almost empty. As such it had run out and wouldn't take any more pictures by the time I got half way through.
Luckily I had my phone so I used the camera on that to take a few pics, but I therefore didn't bother at all during the air displays.
The other cock-up was wearing shorts and dumping the jumper I'd packed. It was surprisingly chilly for the most part although, weirdly, I got sunburnt! I guess the sun was strong when it was out (plus we've not really seen the sun for me to build up any sort of resistance) but it wasn't actually warm.
But as well as the aircraft on display, which took me all morning to go around they had an "innovation zone" and a "space zone". I paid these brief visits. The space one was a bit rubbish, but the innovation one looked good, although I realised there just wasn't going to be the time to go around.
Quite how people find the time on the trade days when all the big halls are opened too I don't know.
Friday, 20 July 2012
Thursday, 19 July 2012
the humax you fix with cotton buds
I mentioned before about how my PVR, which is a Humax 9200T, had developed an odd and annoying fault.
To briefly recap the clock would "fail" when it went into standby, which meant that it would then not wake up in order to record programs. This meant I had to leave the box on all the time.
Doing some digging around I eventually found a forum where lots of other people with this PVR were having the same problem. Initially there were a few different ideas as to what was happening but eventually one of them had worked out that (in essence) contamination on the surface of the printed circuit board was causing the thing to short.
The solution was therefore to disconnect it and take it out of the machine and clean it. Cleaning could be achieved using ethanol alcohol, which was most easily found in a reasonably pure form in surgical spirit and cotton buds (the ones you put in your ear but are told not to) were ideal for the actual cleaning.
As such, Saturday morning, after having returned from doing my washing I set about my PVR with a screwdriver and released the PCB.
It was quite a job, actually, as the cables connecting it to the main machine was difficult to get at and disconnect. There were also a lot more screws than I was expecting.
Having liberated it I set about it with the cotton buds and surgical spirit. This was quite tedious if I'm honest. There was one particularly area of the board that the instructions said were key, so I focused there, but I gave the whole board a wipe over too.
A lot of gunk came off, but the instructions also indicated that it wasn't really dirt that was the problem as such. Also I think a lot of what looked like dirt was actually felt tip pen marks. I'm assuming these felt tip pen marks were put on when they were wiring and soldering the board up.
I gave the key area several goings over. In the forum thread a few people had said they'd needed to do it a couple of times before it had worked and I figured better to overdo it than have to take the thing apart again.
I left it to dry a bit (alcohol evaporates at room temperature, so it wasn't really very "wet" and then re-assembled. I left it for a while again and then switched on. Initial success was achieved in that nothing blew up and everything worked in terms of showing TV channels and playing back recordings.
And then - the moment of truth. I put it into standby and... It worked. The standby clock came on and stayed on. I switched it on and off a few times. I left it in standby for a good while. I set up some recordings, put it in standby and it turned on.
Indeed it has been working like there was never any problem in the first place.
So we have success!
And what's particularly pleasing is that Humax would have charged £30 for the PCB replacement. This only cost me about £7.00 and that was mainly because all the local boots had was a big bottle of surgical spirit.
To briefly recap the clock would "fail" when it went into standby, which meant that it would then not wake up in order to record programs. This meant I had to leave the box on all the time.
Doing some digging around I eventually found a forum where lots of other people with this PVR were having the same problem. Initially there were a few different ideas as to what was happening but eventually one of them had worked out that (in essence) contamination on the surface of the printed circuit board was causing the thing to short.
The solution was therefore to disconnect it and take it out of the machine and clean it. Cleaning could be achieved using ethanol alcohol, which was most easily found in a reasonably pure form in surgical spirit and cotton buds (the ones you put in your ear but are told not to) were ideal for the actual cleaning.
As such, Saturday morning, after having returned from doing my washing I set about my PVR with a screwdriver and released the PCB.
It was quite a job, actually, as the cables connecting it to the main machine was difficult to get at and disconnect. There were also a lot more screws than I was expecting.
Having liberated it I set about it with the cotton buds and surgical spirit. This was quite tedious if I'm honest. There was one particularly area of the board that the instructions said were key, so I focused there, but I gave the whole board a wipe over too.
A lot of gunk came off, but the instructions also indicated that it wasn't really dirt that was the problem as such. Also I think a lot of what looked like dirt was actually felt tip pen marks. I'm assuming these felt tip pen marks were put on when they were wiring and soldering the board up.
I gave the key area several goings over. In the forum thread a few people had said they'd needed to do it a couple of times before it had worked and I figured better to overdo it than have to take the thing apart again.
I left it to dry a bit (alcohol evaporates at room temperature, so it wasn't really very "wet" and then re-assembled. I left it for a while again and then switched on. Initial success was achieved in that nothing blew up and everything worked in terms of showing TV channels and playing back recordings.
And then - the moment of truth. I put it into standby and... It worked. The standby clock came on and stayed on. I switched it on and off a few times. I left it in standby for a good while. I set up some recordings, put it in standby and it turned on.
Indeed it has been working like there was never any problem in the first place.
So we have success!
And what's particularly pleasing is that Humax would have charged £30 for the PCB replacement. This only cost me about £7.00 and that was mainly because all the local boots had was a big bottle of surgical spirit.
Wednesday, 18 July 2012
green lantern
Wow, this was terrible.
I'd heard it was bad, of course. But then I've watched plenty of stuff that's supposed to be bad and enjoyed it. And of course sometimes when things are properly bad you can watch them and enjoy them on that level.
There are obviously some things that you find so terrible you can't enjoy them on that level - I find bad singing / karaoke to be so horrible I can't stand it even though I know other people roll around laughing. Well, this isn't that. It's just bad.
Of course part of the problem here is I'm not really a fan of the green lantern comics. Indeed, I'm not really that big a fan of DC in general. I dunno, I've always found their stuff a bit dorky - I was always more of a Marvel kind of guy.
I mean even batman - he works, basically, but they managed to give him such a rubbish costume. I mean, every film adaptation, the first thing they've done is re-do the costume, right? And he usually ends up some form of black, right? Because black's cool and grey and navy aren't.
The other part of the problem is that I find the green lantern thing particularly silly. I mean, let's get to it - it's called the green lantern, yet they wear a ring. And yes I know they recharge the ring from the lantern, it's just it's that kind of stupid "just because" that marks out bad comic books for me. Well, it marks out bad story telling full stop, but it just crops up a lot in comic books.
So what's wrong with the film itself?
Well, to start with the hero is not particularly likeable. He's a good-looking jock and behaves like a bit of a prat. There's an attempt to make him likeable by giving him a relationship with his nephew, but this just comes across as being forced in to make him likeable.
The film also dumps you right into the mythos of the comics without any real explanation as to what's what. Well, it has a crack at explaining it, but tbh it's all a bit naff and clichéd. It's also confusing and a bit messy and relies on narrators and all powerful weirdy beards. Weirdy beards who, by the way, who seem to be stand-offish and meddling all at the same time.
It was also way too long.
It looked quite pretty, though.
I'd heard it was bad, of course. But then I've watched plenty of stuff that's supposed to be bad and enjoyed it. And of course sometimes when things are properly bad you can watch them and enjoy them on that level.
There are obviously some things that you find so terrible you can't enjoy them on that level - I find bad singing / karaoke to be so horrible I can't stand it even though I know other people roll around laughing. Well, this isn't that. It's just bad.
Of course part of the problem here is I'm not really a fan of the green lantern comics. Indeed, I'm not really that big a fan of DC in general. I dunno, I've always found their stuff a bit dorky - I was always more of a Marvel kind of guy.
I mean even batman - he works, basically, but they managed to give him such a rubbish costume. I mean, every film adaptation, the first thing they've done is re-do the costume, right? And he usually ends up some form of black, right? Because black's cool and grey and navy aren't.
The other part of the problem is that I find the green lantern thing particularly silly. I mean, let's get to it - it's called the green lantern, yet they wear a ring. And yes I know they recharge the ring from the lantern, it's just it's that kind of stupid "just because" that marks out bad comic books for me. Well, it marks out bad story telling full stop, but it just crops up a lot in comic books.
So what's wrong with the film itself?
Well, to start with the hero is not particularly likeable. He's a good-looking jock and behaves like a bit of a prat. There's an attempt to make him likeable by giving him a relationship with his nephew, but this just comes across as being forced in to make him likeable.
The film also dumps you right into the mythos of the comics without any real explanation as to what's what. Well, it has a crack at explaining it, but tbh it's all a bit naff and clichéd. It's also confusing and a bit messy and relies on narrators and all powerful weirdy beards. Weirdy beards who, by the way, who seem to be stand-offish and meddling all at the same time.
It was also way too long.
It looked quite pretty, though.
Tuesday, 17 July 2012
job offer
Well, start at the beginning as they say.
Early last week I received a job offer. There were 3 jobs still in the pipeline where I'd had one or more interviews and were still waiting to know. Well, technically there were 4 but one went totally silent on me a while back.
Having received the offer from one (and it is a bloody good offer) I felt confident in pushing the others about where I stood - was I going to get an offer or did they want to see me again or what? I also said I'd received an offer to help chivvy things along (which can be risky in case they think you're trying to play hard-ball or bullshitting).
Anyway, both of the others came back as a no.
If I'm totally honest I would have put the one that made me an offer at the bottom of the list of the three, but then the two above it didn't want me.
I also needed to think long and hard about this offer. Not the offer itself, which as I say is very generous, but whether I wanted to go in that direction with my career and how I saw things going. In particular the job description is a bit different from what I'd originally envisaged when I started looking for a new job.
Also, unfortunately something happened that made the whole situation a bit more complicated.
since I don't want to say who the company is it's very difficult for me to explain this, but it did give me pause for thought, shall we say.
However, having considered everything I have decided to accept the offer. They've sent me a whole bunch of forms to fill out and they want to vet me so I don't technically have the job yet.
However, I have given them a tentative verbal yes.
My next scary thing to do is tell my boss. It's a little tricky since I obviously don't have a start date and there's a bit of a chicken and egg situation.
They won't discuss start date until I get the vetting, but I can't give proper notice without a date. I also don't want to give notice in case I somehow fail the vetting - I'd be out of a job entirely! However, I need to tell my boss I'm off because part of the vetting is taking up references from my current employer!
What I've therefore decided to do is talk to my boss and explain it all - can't give a firm leave date as they need to vet me before discussing that, and as part of that they will be taking up references so expect a call.
This way it also maximises the preparation time they have for when I leave. I guess also they may want to make a counter offer, but I'd be amazed if they can afford to better it.
Early last week I received a job offer. There were 3 jobs still in the pipeline where I'd had one or more interviews and were still waiting to know. Well, technically there were 4 but one went totally silent on me a while back.
Having received the offer from one (and it is a bloody good offer) I felt confident in pushing the others about where I stood - was I going to get an offer or did they want to see me again or what? I also said I'd received an offer to help chivvy things along (which can be risky in case they think you're trying to play hard-ball or bullshitting).
Anyway, both of the others came back as a no.
If I'm totally honest I would have put the one that made me an offer at the bottom of the list of the three, but then the two above it didn't want me.
I also needed to think long and hard about this offer. Not the offer itself, which as I say is very generous, but whether I wanted to go in that direction with my career and how I saw things going. In particular the job description is a bit different from what I'd originally envisaged when I started looking for a new job.
Also, unfortunately something happened that made the whole situation a bit more complicated.
since I don't want to say who the company is it's very difficult for me to explain this, but it did give me pause for thought, shall we say.
However, having considered everything I have decided to accept the offer. They've sent me a whole bunch of forms to fill out and they want to vet me so I don't technically have the job yet.
However, I have given them a tentative verbal yes.
My next scary thing to do is tell my boss. It's a little tricky since I obviously don't have a start date and there's a bit of a chicken and egg situation.
They won't discuss start date until I get the vetting, but I can't give proper notice without a date. I also don't want to give notice in case I somehow fail the vetting - I'd be out of a job entirely! However, I need to tell my boss I'm off because part of the vetting is taking up references from my current employer!
What I've therefore decided to do is talk to my boss and explain it all - can't give a firm leave date as they need to vet me before discussing that, and as part of that they will be taking up references so expect a call.
This way it also maximises the preparation time they have for when I leave. I guess also they may want to make a counter offer, but I'd be amazed if they can afford to better it.
Monday, 16 July 2012
official cereal bar
Well it's been an eventful couple of days, but in order to give me a chance to find some space I thougth I'd post the one I missed last week.
There's three words that tell you everything that's wrong with the modern world.
Nature Valley Cereal Bars are the official Cereal Bar Supplier to the London 2012 Olympics.
Now don't get me wrong here - I'm sure Nature Valley makes a lovely cereal bar. And if the sports in the Olympics are your bag then I'm sure it's a lovely thing. If you've got tickets and you're going along to an event then I hope you have a great time.
But why does the Olympics need an official cereal bar supplier?
When the Greeks were wrestling each other, naked and slathered in oil, on top of some mountain somewhere, do you honestly think that the proposition of having an official cereal bar supplier would have made them realise that that's where they'd been going wrong all these years - no official supplier of cereal bars!
Side stepping the issues of the fact the Greeks probably didn't know what a cereal bar was, let alone care, why does the Olympics need an official anything? Why is the Olympics a brand? Why does it need marketing? If it needs those things to pay for it why is it costing us taxpayers a small fortune?
The British Grand Prix doesn't have an official supplier of cereal bars (though I don't doubt Bernie has spent many a misty-eyed moment dreaming of all the extra cash he could rake in if he could just pursued everybody else that what F1 really needs is a bunch of official suppliers of stuff that's irrelevant to the successful undertaking of the sport). Wimbledon doesn't have an official supplier of cereal bars.
Heck, I don't think even football - the veritable flagship of just how much rampant capitalism can fuck up good things - has an official supplier of cereal bars. I mean, I'm pretty sure it has sponsors and I would guess it has official suppliers of things like footballs and I know the team's kit is supplied by a sportswear supplier.
But that's my point - sponsorship has an air of "normality" to it (even if it can leave a bad taste in the mouth) and supplying stuff the sport needs makes sense (even if, again, it's a bit capitalist of my personal taste) but having an "official supplier" of something that plainly isn't essential is just not right.
This rant was brought to you by Reebok - the official supplier of trainers to the transperambulation blog.
There's three words that tell you everything that's wrong with the modern world.
Nature Valley Cereal Bars are the official Cereal Bar Supplier to the London 2012 Olympics.
Now don't get me wrong here - I'm sure Nature Valley makes a lovely cereal bar. And if the sports in the Olympics are your bag then I'm sure it's a lovely thing. If you've got tickets and you're going along to an event then I hope you have a great time.
But why does the Olympics need an official cereal bar supplier?
When the Greeks were wrestling each other, naked and slathered in oil, on top of some mountain somewhere, do you honestly think that the proposition of having an official cereal bar supplier would have made them realise that that's where they'd been going wrong all these years - no official supplier of cereal bars!
Side stepping the issues of the fact the Greeks probably didn't know what a cereal bar was, let alone care, why does the Olympics need an official anything? Why is the Olympics a brand? Why does it need marketing? If it needs those things to pay for it why is it costing us taxpayers a small fortune?
The British Grand Prix doesn't have an official supplier of cereal bars (though I don't doubt Bernie has spent many a misty-eyed moment dreaming of all the extra cash he could rake in if he could just pursued everybody else that what F1 really needs is a bunch of official suppliers of stuff that's irrelevant to the successful undertaking of the sport). Wimbledon doesn't have an official supplier of cereal bars.
Heck, I don't think even football - the veritable flagship of just how much rampant capitalism can fuck up good things - has an official supplier of cereal bars. I mean, I'm pretty sure it has sponsors and I would guess it has official suppliers of things like footballs and I know the team's kit is supplied by a sportswear supplier.
But that's my point - sponsorship has an air of "normality" to it (even if it can leave a bad taste in the mouth) and supplying stuff the sport needs makes sense (even if, again, it's a bit capitalist of my personal taste) but having an "official supplier" of something that plainly isn't essential is just not right.
This rant was brought to you by Reebok - the official supplier of trainers to the transperambulation blog.
Friday, 13 July 2012
put the cotton bud where?
I did actually write a blog post yesterday, but I was so busy I forgot to post it. It was quite generic, so I'll save it for next week.
So I have a bit of an update on the PVR front.
It's a bit weird, though.
Apparently, the losing the time when going into standby is actually quite a common problem with the 9200 Humax box. Indeed, it's commonly called the --:-- problem as that's what the display shows instead of the time while in standby.
There is also a solution. But it's a bit weird.
Basically, the front panel isn't just a display, it also houses the clock components that show the time and, more importantly, wake the machine from standby when it needs to record. These components consist (excluding the display itself and among other minor bits) of a chip, a large capacitor and an oscillator.
What has been diagnosed as happening is that the components are, very roughly speaking shorting due to impurity build up on the surface of the actual Printed Circuit Board (PCB) these are all attached too. It's a little more complicated than that, from what I can make out, but the solution is, in essence, to clean the circuit board.
Now it's not really dirt that's the problem, but it's easier to think in those terms. And being a PCB you can't just stick it in the washing and give it a scrub. To clean it (and I'm going to give it a go) you have to use cotton buds and surgical spirit (basically meths without the minerals).
The reason I'm going to give it a go is that the official solution is to phone Humax and get them to send me a replacement board, which costs about £30. I can't honestly believe the board costs anything like £30 - the main components I mentioned are purchasable online for less than £2.00. Hence why I'm going to give it a go this weekend.
By the way - it also potentially does relate to the power cut. A couple of people on the forum I looked this up on reported it happening after power cuts. And given the point of the capacitor is to keep the clock going during power outages (it's obviously powered normally when plugged in) I suspect that the brown outs caused some sort of problem that's led to this issue.
There's a lot more detail with instructions on this forum - http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1274989 (just in case someone has stumbled across this blog entry via a google search or similar).
So I have a bit of an update on the PVR front.
It's a bit weird, though.
Apparently, the losing the time when going into standby is actually quite a common problem with the 9200 Humax box. Indeed, it's commonly called the --:-- problem as that's what the display shows instead of the time while in standby.
There is also a solution. But it's a bit weird.
Basically, the front panel isn't just a display, it also houses the clock components that show the time and, more importantly, wake the machine from standby when it needs to record. These components consist (excluding the display itself and among other minor bits) of a chip, a large capacitor and an oscillator.
What has been diagnosed as happening is that the components are, very roughly speaking shorting due to impurity build up on the surface of the actual Printed Circuit Board (PCB) these are all attached too. It's a little more complicated than that, from what I can make out, but the solution is, in essence, to clean the circuit board.
Now it's not really dirt that's the problem, but it's easier to think in those terms. And being a PCB you can't just stick it in the washing and give it a scrub. To clean it (and I'm going to give it a go) you have to use cotton buds and surgical spirit (basically meths without the minerals).
The reason I'm going to give it a go is that the official solution is to phone Humax and get them to send me a replacement board, which costs about £30. I can't honestly believe the board costs anything like £30 - the main components I mentioned are purchasable online for less than £2.00. Hence why I'm going to give it a go this weekend.
By the way - it also potentially does relate to the power cut. A couple of people on the forum I looked this up on reported it happening after power cuts. And given the point of the capacitor is to keep the clock going during power outages (it's obviously powered normally when plugged in) I suspect that the brown outs caused some sort of problem that's led to this issue.
There's a lot more detail with instructions on this forum - http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1274989 (just in case someone has stumbled across this blog entry via a google search or similar).
Wednesday, 11 July 2012
thor
I was very pleasantly surprised by Thor.
I can't say I was ever a fan of him in comic book form. Norse mythology is quite interesting, but the particular interpretation used in the comic books never particularly interested me.
I also wasn't a particular fan of his costume and the use of a sort of formal, upper class English with a bit of middle-ages English thrown in for good measure always struck me as a bit weird. He's a Norse god, not a Shakespearean character.
I also always found it a bit daft that he ever had any problems at all - I mean, he's a God, right? Okay a lot of the adventures revolved around Loki and he's from a polytheistic faith so perhaps isn't all-powerful (though I think his dad, Odin, was supposed to be) but still - dude's a God, and there's that thing in fiction where if anything is possible, nothing is interesting.
There's also the thing where all faiths seem to exist and be correct in the Marvel Universe, which again, always struck me as a bit weird.
Anyway, the film generally worked quite well. If I was to criticise one element of it, that would be that Asgard seemed a bit weird. I mean, it was quite comic-booky, but perhaps a bit too much? It just felt very artificial, even factoring the point that it's fictional, if you see what I mean.
The plot was pretty much what I basically understood the origin of Thor to be - being headstrong and ending up getting kicked out of Asgard and then redeeming himself. One thing I did find interesting was Loki - they did quite a good job of portraying him as one of the good guys up to a point where he turned.
Knowing the character in the comics where he's always the trickster and causing mischief, it was quite difficult to set that aside, but it was done convincingly here.
What also worked very well were the humanising / humbling of Thor himself. You genuinely felt he had a character ark, which could have been quite difficult to achieve, given he starts of as a heroically good God, but it was a bit more subtle than that (if, ultimately, obvious in story terms).
The film also had lots of funny stuff in it and looked great. In particular the costumes were well done to preserve the basic design points, but didn't look daft. I think it was a particularly wise choice to ditch Thor's helmet for the majority of the film, for example.
So yeah, one of the better Marvel adaptations, I think. We'll just have to see if the second one suffers for not having Kenneth Branagh at the helm.
I can't say I was ever a fan of him in comic book form. Norse mythology is quite interesting, but the particular interpretation used in the comic books never particularly interested me.
I also wasn't a particular fan of his costume and the use of a sort of formal, upper class English with a bit of middle-ages English thrown in for good measure always struck me as a bit weird. He's a Norse god, not a Shakespearean character.
I also always found it a bit daft that he ever had any problems at all - I mean, he's a God, right? Okay a lot of the adventures revolved around Loki and he's from a polytheistic faith so perhaps isn't all-powerful (though I think his dad, Odin, was supposed to be) but still - dude's a God, and there's that thing in fiction where if anything is possible, nothing is interesting.
There's also the thing where all faiths seem to exist and be correct in the Marvel Universe, which again, always struck me as a bit weird.
Anyway, the film generally worked quite well. If I was to criticise one element of it, that would be that Asgard seemed a bit weird. I mean, it was quite comic-booky, but perhaps a bit too much? It just felt very artificial, even factoring the point that it's fictional, if you see what I mean.
The plot was pretty much what I basically understood the origin of Thor to be - being headstrong and ending up getting kicked out of Asgard and then redeeming himself. One thing I did find interesting was Loki - they did quite a good job of portraying him as one of the good guys up to a point where he turned.
Knowing the character in the comics where he's always the trickster and causing mischief, it was quite difficult to set that aside, but it was done convincingly here.
What also worked very well were the humanising / humbling of Thor himself. You genuinely felt he had a character ark, which could have been quite difficult to achieve, given he starts of as a heroically good God, but it was a bit more subtle than that (if, ultimately, obvious in story terms).
The film also had lots of funny stuff in it and looked great. In particular the costumes were well done to preserve the basic design points, but didn't look daft. I think it was a particularly wise choice to ditch Thor's helmet for the majority of the film, for example.
So yeah, one of the better Marvel adaptations, I think. We'll just have to see if the second one suffers for not having Kenneth Branagh at the helm.
Tuesday, 10 July 2012
don't use London
While I was "enjoying" my mammoth driving day last Thursday I saw a sign that said:
"During the Olympics avoid driving in central London"
This amused me quite a lot. I wonder if the advice applies to everyone that lives and works in central London as well?
The Olympics are only a couple of weeks away. I'm already saving things up to watch on my PVR as I'm anticipating a bit of a dearth of watchable stuff for me.
Don't get me wrong - I've nothing really against the Olympics as a sporting event. Indeed, I think they're good things from the sporting point of view, it's just they are, on the whole, a collection of sports that I just don't care about.
And I guess, to be honest, I don't mind that they'll probably absorb all the TV hours that there are - it will give me an opportunity to do other stuff.
And mentioning that, my PVR it's still not working right.
The problem is a bit of a weird one. Basically, when I put it in standby what should happen is that the clock stays lit showing the time. This is an outward manifestation of the PVR tracking the time so that it can switch itself on when a recorded program comes up.
It now doesn't do this. If I put it in standby it just shows a dash-dash-colon-dash-dash patter you will be familiar with from new appliances which have a clock that you haven't programmed.
As such, it's not tracking the time and so when a recording time roles around it just sits there and does nothing.
However, where it gets weird is that if I put it in standby while it's recorded a pre-recorded program, then it holds the time like it should, even after the program stops recording. And the key there is it's a pre-set recording. If I just set it to record and then put it in standby it doesn't hold the time either.
However, the above is all quite erratic - occasionally it will hold the time even if it's not recording a pre-scheduled program. And it will always do pre-recorded programs if you leave it on, which means sometimes I've had to leave it on all night and all day to record stuff that's on late or on in the day.
It reminds me quite a lot of what happens when a CMOS battery fails, and really the PVR is just a computer in a VCR style box with appropriate connectors and a specially designed operating system.
In those cases when you switch the computer on after the power has been off it will ask you to set the time. But then if you turn it off without turning the power fully off it will hold that time. IT's only when you turn the power off that it would use the CMOS battery to help it store the time.
The difference is I'm not turning the PVR off, just putting it in standby.
There has actually recently been an announcement that a new on-demand TV thing will be rolling out quite soon and of course my current box doesn't have HD at all, so I'm actually tempted to buy a new box with these other features. However, in the meantime I've bought some cables that should allow me to connect the PVR to my computer and then do something roughly equivalent to a bios update in the hopes that what's actually happened is software related.
If not and it's something in the hardware it may essentially make the decision of buying a new box for me.
"During the Olympics avoid driving in central London"
This amused me quite a lot. I wonder if the advice applies to everyone that lives and works in central London as well?
The Olympics are only a couple of weeks away. I'm already saving things up to watch on my PVR as I'm anticipating a bit of a dearth of watchable stuff for me.
Don't get me wrong - I've nothing really against the Olympics as a sporting event. Indeed, I think they're good things from the sporting point of view, it's just they are, on the whole, a collection of sports that I just don't care about.
And I guess, to be honest, I don't mind that they'll probably absorb all the TV hours that there are - it will give me an opportunity to do other stuff.
And mentioning that, my PVR it's still not working right.
The problem is a bit of a weird one. Basically, when I put it in standby what should happen is that the clock stays lit showing the time. This is an outward manifestation of the PVR tracking the time so that it can switch itself on when a recorded program comes up.
It now doesn't do this. If I put it in standby it just shows a dash-dash-colon-dash-dash patter you will be familiar with from new appliances which have a clock that you haven't programmed.
As such, it's not tracking the time and so when a recording time roles around it just sits there and does nothing.
However, where it gets weird is that if I put it in standby while it's recorded a pre-recorded program, then it holds the time like it should, even after the program stops recording. And the key there is it's a pre-set recording. If I just set it to record and then put it in standby it doesn't hold the time either.
However, the above is all quite erratic - occasionally it will hold the time even if it's not recording a pre-scheduled program. And it will always do pre-recorded programs if you leave it on, which means sometimes I've had to leave it on all night and all day to record stuff that's on late or on in the day.
It reminds me quite a lot of what happens when a CMOS battery fails, and really the PVR is just a computer in a VCR style box with appropriate connectors and a specially designed operating system.
In those cases when you switch the computer on after the power has been off it will ask you to set the time. But then if you turn it off without turning the power fully off it will hold that time. IT's only when you turn the power off that it would use the CMOS battery to help it store the time.
The difference is I'm not turning the PVR off, just putting it in standby.
There has actually recently been an announcement that a new on-demand TV thing will be rolling out quite soon and of course my current box doesn't have HD at all, so I'm actually tempted to buy a new box with these other features. However, in the meantime I've bought some cables that should allow me to connect the PVR to my computer and then do something roughly equivalent to a bios update in the hopes that what's actually happened is software related.
If not and it's something in the hardware it may essentially make the decision of buying a new box for me.
Monday, 9 July 2012
british grand prix
My dad and sister went to the British grand prix.
I didn't. I couldn't really afford it, both in terms of finances and time. Finances because I'm hopeless at managing them and time because even when the idea was proposed I was planning to look for a new job and new I'd need the days leave for that.
As it turns out I think I was somewhat fortunate. The weather has been particularly dreadful and on Saturday (Qualifying day) they were turning people away from the parking as the hard-standing areas were already full and they wanted to give the soft-standing areas time to dry out a bit.
Silverstone is quite an exposed track. Like many of the UK's racing circuits it's an old airfield and as you'd imagine, you generally want to put airfields in nice open areas so there's nothing for the pilots to crash into.
There are stands, of course, and they can be good for keeping you out of the wind and rain, although this can depend quite heavily on direction. I recall one year sitting in the stand and still getting wet and cold because the rain was driving into the front of the stand.
Anyway - the race itself.
It was a really good one. The British Grand Prix can occasionally produce a duffer. The problem is that it's pretty high speed, and overtaking normally only tends to be associated with technical sections (people make mistakes) and high speed straight into slow-speed corner.
Anyway, this was a good one and part of it came from my old theory about how, if you want to produce good races a good way to achieve it is to randomise the field (a draw like in football cups, for example). If there was a lottery-style draw you end up with lots of fast cars out of position so you tend to get overtaking.
F1 is a trickier case for this idea as some circuits overtaking is extremely difficult (Monaco and other street circuits) and the cars are heavily dependent on down force, which makes getting close to the guy in front difficult, since you drive into his turbulent air and your own down force is less effective.
Nowadays of course we've had some counters to that - you've got DRS and KERS to help with overtaking and the rules changed so little since last year that it's made everything closer.
This is another element for F1 - they bugger about with the rules a lot. But then this is swings and roundabouts - they bugger about with them because people find ways to exploit them and these often need ruling out.
But yes, we ended up with a cracking race, although the McLarens didn't do much - it comes across like they've been struggling to really push the car forward. They started out with the best car at the start, but failed to capitalise it, partly due to a few too many human errors. Now everyone else seems to have developed the car so they're at the same level if not a bit quicker, where the McLaren seems to have stagnated.
I didn't. I couldn't really afford it, both in terms of finances and time. Finances because I'm hopeless at managing them and time because even when the idea was proposed I was planning to look for a new job and new I'd need the days leave for that.
As it turns out I think I was somewhat fortunate. The weather has been particularly dreadful and on Saturday (Qualifying day) they were turning people away from the parking as the hard-standing areas were already full and they wanted to give the soft-standing areas time to dry out a bit.
Silverstone is quite an exposed track. Like many of the UK's racing circuits it's an old airfield and as you'd imagine, you generally want to put airfields in nice open areas so there's nothing for the pilots to crash into.
There are stands, of course, and they can be good for keeping you out of the wind and rain, although this can depend quite heavily on direction. I recall one year sitting in the stand and still getting wet and cold because the rain was driving into the front of the stand.
Anyway - the race itself.
It was a really good one. The British Grand Prix can occasionally produce a duffer. The problem is that it's pretty high speed, and overtaking normally only tends to be associated with technical sections (people make mistakes) and high speed straight into slow-speed corner.
Anyway, this was a good one and part of it came from my old theory about how, if you want to produce good races a good way to achieve it is to randomise the field (a draw like in football cups, for example). If there was a lottery-style draw you end up with lots of fast cars out of position so you tend to get overtaking.
F1 is a trickier case for this idea as some circuits overtaking is extremely difficult (Monaco and other street circuits) and the cars are heavily dependent on down force, which makes getting close to the guy in front difficult, since you drive into his turbulent air and your own down force is less effective.
Nowadays of course we've had some counters to that - you've got DRS and KERS to help with overtaking and the rules changed so little since last year that it's made everything closer.
This is another element for F1 - they bugger about with the rules a lot. But then this is swings and roundabouts - they bugger about with them because people find ways to exploit them and these often need ruling out.
But yes, we ended up with a cracking race, although the McLarens didn't do much - it comes across like they've been struggling to really push the car forward. They started out with the best car at the start, but failed to capitalise it, partly due to a few too many human errors. Now everyone else seems to have developed the car so they're at the same level if not a bit quicker, where the McLaren seems to have stagnated.
Friday, 6 July 2012
fit to drop
Yesterday was a very long day.
It started early with me getting up at 5:00AM in order to get ready for my first interview. I set of at about 6:30AM and this was too early. I arrived at about 8:00AM and sat in the multi-storey for about an hour before heading out to the interview.
I've discussed before how I'm pathologically incapable of being late, and this was another example of it, although in my defence I was heading into London and had no idea how the traffic would be. Indeed, if the end of the day was any judge I could easily have been several hours late!
The second interview went okay. The plan was a bit wholly and I ended up sat in what was essentially a team meeting. I wasn't at all sure what, if anything, I was meant to contribute to this.
Also I was obviously handicapped by being quite shy. this is a particular problem around new people (as I'm sure it is with all shy people) but also with larger groups and it turned out the team was quite large. I was introduced to them all, but I am terrible with names, so 2 seconds after the introductions I had utterly forgotten who they were.
It didn't help of course that I had my second interview in the afternoon and I was worried about having enough time to get up there, so when it came to questions each time I was more keen to move on than ask a lot of questions.
While I think I would like the people there and the job sounded interesting, I would have two problems - it's a little outside of my experience and I'm still not sure about working in London. Certainly I don't think I could stand moving into London.
The second interview was in Cambridge. I set off for it a bit later than I'd hoped and so put my foot down on the motorway. It had thankfully cleared from the rush-hour so I made it up in time, but if I'd travelled at my usual pace I'd have been late. As it was I only had about 20 minutes for my lunch.
The second interview was the technical one.
I'd spent as much time as I could doing the prep work, but it was quite difficult to know what direction to take that - should I focus on the physics or the kit they actually sell? Should I try and memorise a handful of the facts or get a more general feel.
As it turned out they covered a good range of topics, but didn't go too deep into the areas. Also I got to play with a couple of their products, which was interesting.
My fear on this job is that they are quite focused on that one small area. On the plus side it turns out their products are really clever and complicated, but I keep flip-flopping - is it too specialised, or is it techy enough to compensate for that.
I felt this one went better than the first, but I did find I couldn't answer some of their questions and also made some clear errors that would have been solved if I'd sat and thought for a while, rather than just blurting out answers.
The fit to drop of the title comes from the fact that, having been up since five, done some 5 or 6 hours of driving and not finished the second interview until 4PM I then had the journey from hell home.
Basically it didn't start well, as there was an accident on the M11. Now, to be fair, the people on the other carriageway had an utter nightmare, because it was queued back for miles, and was literally stopped. Most of the people there had actually gotten out of their cars.
On my side the problem was caused by people rubber-necking - slowing down to look at the accident.
I'm not sure if it was this delay or the fact the accident on the M11 meant people would be taking different routes, but when I arrived at the M4 / M3 area of the M25 it ground to a halt. I must have crawled along for about an hour before finally getting on to the A3.
Now admittedly I did go and get some petrol and grab some junk food to cheer me up, but it was 8:00PM before I got home. So that must have been about 8 hours I spent driving yesterday.
Hence why I was shattered and today I have basically been useless.
It started early with me getting up at 5:00AM in order to get ready for my first interview. I set of at about 6:30AM and this was too early. I arrived at about 8:00AM and sat in the multi-storey for about an hour before heading out to the interview.
I've discussed before how I'm pathologically incapable of being late, and this was another example of it, although in my defence I was heading into London and had no idea how the traffic would be. Indeed, if the end of the day was any judge I could easily have been several hours late!
The second interview went okay. The plan was a bit wholly and I ended up sat in what was essentially a team meeting. I wasn't at all sure what, if anything, I was meant to contribute to this.
Also I was obviously handicapped by being quite shy. this is a particular problem around new people (as I'm sure it is with all shy people) but also with larger groups and it turned out the team was quite large. I was introduced to them all, but I am terrible with names, so 2 seconds after the introductions I had utterly forgotten who they were.
It didn't help of course that I had my second interview in the afternoon and I was worried about having enough time to get up there, so when it came to questions each time I was more keen to move on than ask a lot of questions.
While I think I would like the people there and the job sounded interesting, I would have two problems - it's a little outside of my experience and I'm still not sure about working in London. Certainly I don't think I could stand moving into London.
The second interview was in Cambridge. I set off for it a bit later than I'd hoped and so put my foot down on the motorway. It had thankfully cleared from the rush-hour so I made it up in time, but if I'd travelled at my usual pace I'd have been late. As it was I only had about 20 minutes for my lunch.
The second interview was the technical one.
I'd spent as much time as I could doing the prep work, but it was quite difficult to know what direction to take that - should I focus on the physics or the kit they actually sell? Should I try and memorise a handful of the facts or get a more general feel.
As it turned out they covered a good range of topics, but didn't go too deep into the areas. Also I got to play with a couple of their products, which was interesting.
My fear on this job is that they are quite focused on that one small area. On the plus side it turns out their products are really clever and complicated, but I keep flip-flopping - is it too specialised, or is it techy enough to compensate for that.
I felt this one went better than the first, but I did find I couldn't answer some of their questions and also made some clear errors that would have been solved if I'd sat and thought for a while, rather than just blurting out answers.
The fit to drop of the title comes from the fact that, having been up since five, done some 5 or 6 hours of driving and not finished the second interview until 4PM I then had the journey from hell home.
Basically it didn't start well, as there was an accident on the M11. Now, to be fair, the people on the other carriageway had an utter nightmare, because it was queued back for miles, and was literally stopped. Most of the people there had actually gotten out of their cars.
On my side the problem was caused by people rubber-necking - slowing down to look at the accident.
I'm not sure if it was this delay or the fact the accident on the M11 meant people would be taking different routes, but when I arrived at the M4 / M3 area of the M25 it ground to a halt. I must have crawled along for about an hour before finally getting on to the A3.
Now admittedly I did go and get some petrol and grab some junk food to cheer me up, but it was 8:00PM before I got home. So that must have been about 8 hours I spent driving yesterday.
Hence why I was shattered and today I have basically been useless.
Wednesday, 4 July 2012
richard hammond's invisible worlds
This was a bit of a different thing for the old rental list.
When I first got the BR drive I naturally considered buying a few BRs to watch to see what it was like. Much to the relief of my bank balance I managed to resist this temptation and instead added a few of them to my rental list.
I added this in particular because it was one of a couple of series that the Beeb had put together when HD was becoming a thing. My PVR digital tuner thing isn't HD, so when I watched this at the time it was in nromal definition. However, it was quite interesting in and of itself and not just a bunch of pretty pictures, so I thought it would be a good thing to re-watch in HD.
It really does look great in HD.
By the nature of what this is about there's a lot of CG stuff, but there's also a lot of use of slow-motion (those digital cameras where they can speen up and slow down are used a lot) and extreme macro photography.
The series has three episodes - Speed Limits, Out of Sight and Off the Scale. The names are pretty obvious - speed limits is about things that happen to fast or slow for us to really see, out of sight is about things that our senses can't really detect and off the scale is abotu stuff that's too small for us to see.
Hammond is essentially jsut a presenter for it, which seems to have become something of a trend - drafting in someone who is otherwise famous to present where you might normally expect a scientist or naturalist to present somethign like this. That's not intended as a criticism - Hammond does a very good job with these - I just mean don't go thinking Hammond came up with the program!
I personally preferred the Speed Limits and Off the Scale ones. I've always been particularly fascinated by perception - how we see the world and how the world really is. For example, and I don't think this was covered in this program, but we only actually see a small section of the world in colour (the cones are in a small section of the retina) and the rest is in black and white. However, you don't see that in your head becase your brain fills in the black and white bits with colour.
And tiny things are always fascinating - the classic being things like a fly's compund eyes, which are are amazing when you see them close up but you don't bat an eyelid about splattering them with a newspaper when they're buzzing around the room gettign on your nerves.
One thing I woudl say was that it was a shame there weren't any extras. Particularly something in the way of a "making of" or some other stuff on the disk would have been nice. In terms of the making of it's odd there wasn't actually, as a lot of recent BBC documentaries have that 10 minute bit at the end where they are essentially filling in for us so that the show is un-edited for other countries with adverts.
When I first got the BR drive I naturally considered buying a few BRs to watch to see what it was like. Much to the relief of my bank balance I managed to resist this temptation and instead added a few of them to my rental list.
I added this in particular because it was one of a couple of series that the Beeb had put together when HD was becoming a thing. My PVR digital tuner thing isn't HD, so when I watched this at the time it was in nromal definition. However, it was quite interesting in and of itself and not just a bunch of pretty pictures, so I thought it would be a good thing to re-watch in HD.
It really does look great in HD.
By the nature of what this is about there's a lot of CG stuff, but there's also a lot of use of slow-motion (those digital cameras where they can speen up and slow down are used a lot) and extreme macro photography.
The series has three episodes - Speed Limits, Out of Sight and Off the Scale. The names are pretty obvious - speed limits is about things that happen to fast or slow for us to really see, out of sight is about things that our senses can't really detect and off the scale is abotu stuff that's too small for us to see.
Hammond is essentially jsut a presenter for it, which seems to have become something of a trend - drafting in someone who is otherwise famous to present where you might normally expect a scientist or naturalist to present somethign like this. That's not intended as a criticism - Hammond does a very good job with these - I just mean don't go thinking Hammond came up with the program!
I personally preferred the Speed Limits and Off the Scale ones. I've always been particularly fascinated by perception - how we see the world and how the world really is. For example, and I don't think this was covered in this program, but we only actually see a small section of the world in colour (the cones are in a small section of the retina) and the rest is in black and white. However, you don't see that in your head becase your brain fills in the black and white bits with colour.
And tiny things are always fascinating - the classic being things like a fly's compund eyes, which are are amazing when you see them close up but you don't bat an eyelid about splattering them with a newspaper when they're buzzing around the room gettign on your nerves.
One thing I woudl say was that it was a shame there weren't any extras. Particularly something in the way of a "making of" or some other stuff on the disk would have been nice. In terms of the making of it's odd there wasn't actually, as a lot of recent BBC documentaries have that 10 minute bit at the end where they are essentially filling in for us so that the show is un-edited for other countries with adverts.
Tuesday, 3 July 2012
red line
I have to confess I was a bit disappointed by red line.
However, part of this was due to the fact the Blu-Ray didn't seem to work properly. When I first got a Blu-Ray drive on my PC I had assumed that the normal windows applications would be able to play it or, failing that, the usual players I use, like MPC.
However, this turned out not to be the case - there was no native support for BR playing and I couldn't find an additional bit of software that played BR's on the window's support site. My assumption is this is some sort of thing in relation to monopolies.
But also none of my usual players worked either, which I was particularly surprised by until I thought about how if there's no native support in windows, this would likely hamper any of the programs I use too. As such I ended up using PowerDVD, which is an awful program, but I got it free with the drive.
Anyway, when I tried to watch Red Line on Power DVD it was all messed up - the picture had horrible issues that I've only ever seen when trying to play fansubs that have used weird codecs.
There didn't seem to be any way to solve this, so I ended up having to download a freeware player. The problem is this program suffers from the classic problem of this type of program - they've given you access to everything and all at the same level of priority. So in other words if you just want to do something simple it's buried amongst all the weird and wonderful rubbish that no normal person ever even thinks about, let alone wants to change.
And to make things worse the player side of it has tiny controls and you can't adjust them. Well my BR PC is hooked up to my TV and so is across the other side of the room from where I sit, so it is utterly impossible to control it without walking up to the screen.
All this pre-amble is to let you know I was quite wound up and annoyed by the time I actually got to watch Red Line and probably helps to explain why I didn't quite take to it.
I have also since been told that the English dub is particularly poor. I did only watch the dub, but in my defence I couldn't work out how to change audio channels on the player. So perhaps if I was to watch the original Japanese I would like it a bit more. Certainly I would say that the dub was a bit flat compared to the visual side.
However, I didn't really love the visual side if I'm honest.
My problem wasn't really with the animation, which I thought was good, it was with the character designs. However, I found it a little difficult to pin down quite why - they felt, I dunno, too western, maybe? Now I don't mean the characters looked to western (anime characters can often seem western in ethnicity) it was more like it reminded me too much of the cartoon I used to enjoy as a kid.
The main guy in particular looked like Johnny Bravo, for example.
I also found the ending a bit hard to follow. I mean, it wasn't complicated, but it seemed to lack any sort of consistency - a lot of stuff happened but without any clear explanation as to why or any real reason for how that then followed on to what happened next.
As I say, I just found it all a bit disappointing.
However, part of this was due to the fact the Blu-Ray didn't seem to work properly. When I first got a Blu-Ray drive on my PC I had assumed that the normal windows applications would be able to play it or, failing that, the usual players I use, like MPC.
However, this turned out not to be the case - there was no native support for BR playing and I couldn't find an additional bit of software that played BR's on the window's support site. My assumption is this is some sort of thing in relation to monopolies.
But also none of my usual players worked either, which I was particularly surprised by until I thought about how if there's no native support in windows, this would likely hamper any of the programs I use too. As such I ended up using PowerDVD, which is an awful program, but I got it free with the drive.
Anyway, when I tried to watch Red Line on Power DVD it was all messed up - the picture had horrible issues that I've only ever seen when trying to play fansubs that have used weird codecs.
There didn't seem to be any way to solve this, so I ended up having to download a freeware player. The problem is this program suffers from the classic problem of this type of program - they've given you access to everything and all at the same level of priority. So in other words if you just want to do something simple it's buried amongst all the weird and wonderful rubbish that no normal person ever even thinks about, let alone wants to change.
And to make things worse the player side of it has tiny controls and you can't adjust them. Well my BR PC is hooked up to my TV and so is across the other side of the room from where I sit, so it is utterly impossible to control it without walking up to the screen.
All this pre-amble is to let you know I was quite wound up and annoyed by the time I actually got to watch Red Line and probably helps to explain why I didn't quite take to it.
I have also since been told that the English dub is particularly poor. I did only watch the dub, but in my defence I couldn't work out how to change audio channels on the player. So perhaps if I was to watch the original Japanese I would like it a bit more. Certainly I would say that the dub was a bit flat compared to the visual side.
However, I didn't really love the visual side if I'm honest.
My problem wasn't really with the animation, which I thought was good, it was with the character designs. However, I found it a little difficult to pin down quite why - they felt, I dunno, too western, maybe? Now I don't mean the characters looked to western (anime characters can often seem western in ethnicity) it was more like it reminded me too much of the cartoon I used to enjoy as a kid.
The main guy in particular looked like Johnny Bravo, for example.
I also found the ending a bit hard to follow. I mean, it wasn't complicated, but it seemed to lack any sort of consistency - a lot of stuff happened but without any clear explanation as to why or any real reason for how that then followed on to what happened next.
As I say, I just found it all a bit disappointing.
Monday, 2 July 2012
revision?
So that was an odd weekend.
I guess I should actually start with the day before the weekend, which is more traditionally labelled "Friday" after the Norse God Frigg, Odin's missus.
Friday was the day of my most recent interview. It was a fair distance away, but close enough that it was a half-day job. I actually set off very early as the route is very direct, but takes me straight through a couple of big towns that sounded like traffic hot spots. Indeed, this was proven very true on the way back when it did indeed take ages to get through one of the towns I'd been most worried about.
This did mean I arrived very early and I decided to use the time to have a quick drive around the closest town. Big mistake. The town was okay when I drove in, but as it approached 8:00 the place ground to a horrible stop. It has a weird one-way ring road system around it and it seems to funnel cars towards a couple of particularly horrible junctions, causing the whole town to seize up.
Because I'd had so much time I wasn't late or anything, but I clearly would have had troubles if I had been a bit closer to the interview time (if that makes sense).
The interview itself went okay.
I don't know that I particularly bowled them over, but I also don't think there were any real show-stoppers in there. I guess it really depends on the calibre of person they're seeing. I have a few disadvantages (and advantages, obviously) with my experience so it can be difficult for me to judge.
I got the feeling though that, unlike one of my prior interviews, they will tell me if I don't succeed. And certainly the timetable he was talking about is quite quick.
Journey back was okay, though as I mentioned I got fouled up in some nasty traffic.
The weekend itself was where the blog title comes in. For my second interview at one of the places they have asked me to try to learn about their product a bit and it sounds like the interview won't be so much of an interview as a test or exercise of some sort.
I've had exercises to do at a few of the interviews, but this is a little different - more focused on the products they have, rather than general skills.
Anyway, that meant I've downloaded and printed out all their sales manuals and some general information from Wikipedia, so I spent a good chunk of the weekend reading it through.
I have to say it's difficult to know quite how technical they're going to expect me to get. I don't know if I should have researched the physics of it all or I'm okay with just the products they make and their capabilities.
That next interview is on Thursday, so I have a few more days to bone up as well.
Also that morning I have a sort of second interview with another company - it's called "meet the team" and, as the name suggests, probably won't be like a formal interview, as such.
I guess I should actually start with the day before the weekend, which is more traditionally labelled "Friday" after the Norse God Frigg, Odin's missus.
Friday was the day of my most recent interview. It was a fair distance away, but close enough that it was a half-day job. I actually set off very early as the route is very direct, but takes me straight through a couple of big towns that sounded like traffic hot spots. Indeed, this was proven very true on the way back when it did indeed take ages to get through one of the towns I'd been most worried about.
This did mean I arrived very early and I decided to use the time to have a quick drive around the closest town. Big mistake. The town was okay when I drove in, but as it approached 8:00 the place ground to a horrible stop. It has a weird one-way ring road system around it and it seems to funnel cars towards a couple of particularly horrible junctions, causing the whole town to seize up.
Because I'd had so much time I wasn't late or anything, but I clearly would have had troubles if I had been a bit closer to the interview time (if that makes sense).
The interview itself went okay.
I don't know that I particularly bowled them over, but I also don't think there were any real show-stoppers in there. I guess it really depends on the calibre of person they're seeing. I have a few disadvantages (and advantages, obviously) with my experience so it can be difficult for me to judge.
I got the feeling though that, unlike one of my prior interviews, they will tell me if I don't succeed. And certainly the timetable he was talking about is quite quick.
Journey back was okay, though as I mentioned I got fouled up in some nasty traffic.
The weekend itself was where the blog title comes in. For my second interview at one of the places they have asked me to try to learn about their product a bit and it sounds like the interview won't be so much of an interview as a test or exercise of some sort.
I've had exercises to do at a few of the interviews, but this is a little different - more focused on the products they have, rather than general skills.
Anyway, that meant I've downloaded and printed out all their sales manuals and some general information from Wikipedia, so I spent a good chunk of the weekend reading it through.
I have to say it's difficult to know quite how technical they're going to expect me to get. I don't know if I should have researched the physics of it all or I'm okay with just the products they make and their capabilities.
That next interview is on Thursday, so I have a few more days to bone up as well.
Also that morning I have a sort of second interview with another company - it's called "meet the team" and, as the name suggests, probably won't be like a formal interview, as such.
Thursday, 28 June 2012
another one tomorrow
Another interview tomorrow morning.
It should be quite an interesting one. It's not really in the same sort of area as the other interviews I've been doing, but that's not a huge issue. While I've generally been looking at technical and product based and away from my current sector, I have applied for a few other things that aren't those.
It's in Oxfordshire, and it's where I went over the weekend. It was actually surprisingly quick to get too, though I'm expecting traffic to make it trickier. I'm going to allow plenty of time, but that does mean I will be setting off at what most people would regard as ridiculously early.
I don't regard it as ridiculously early, just early, since I'm a bit of an early bird and am usually up and about pretty early.
The weekend ahead is where I need to learn about these products for the other interview.
I have to confess I've been having a nagging feeling that it might be a bit narrow for me. They really only have a very small product portfolio and while that's appropriate to what they do, it suggests a very limited variety of work at the least.
I also have to confess that the time it always takes me to get to and from Cambridge is a bit of a worry. One of the things I've had in the back of my mind is that I don't really want to go somewhere that makes the journey to my Dad's worse.
I know that might seem a silly thing to reject a job over, but I like to visit my Dad a couple of times a year and it already takes me the best part of 3 or 4 hours journey time. If I lived in Cambridge that journey would shoot up to 5 hours at the very minimum and with delays (e.g. in summer) I could be looking at 7 hour journey times.
Anyway, as per usual, though I will be back in the office in the afternoon, I doubt very much I'll be blogging.
It should be quite an interesting one. It's not really in the same sort of area as the other interviews I've been doing, but that's not a huge issue. While I've generally been looking at technical and product based and away from my current sector, I have applied for a few other things that aren't those.
It's in Oxfordshire, and it's where I went over the weekend. It was actually surprisingly quick to get too, though I'm expecting traffic to make it trickier. I'm going to allow plenty of time, but that does mean I will be setting off at what most people would regard as ridiculously early.
I don't regard it as ridiculously early, just early, since I'm a bit of an early bird and am usually up and about pretty early.
The weekend ahead is where I need to learn about these products for the other interview.
I have to confess I've been having a nagging feeling that it might be a bit narrow for me. They really only have a very small product portfolio and while that's appropriate to what they do, it suggests a very limited variety of work at the least.
I also have to confess that the time it always takes me to get to and from Cambridge is a bit of a worry. One of the things I've had in the back of my mind is that I don't really want to go somewhere that makes the journey to my Dad's worse.
I know that might seem a silly thing to reject a job over, but I like to visit my Dad a couple of times a year and it already takes me the best part of 3 or 4 hours journey time. If I lived in Cambridge that journey would shoot up to 5 hours at the very minimum and with delays (e.g. in summer) I could be looking at 7 hour journey times.
Anyway, as per usual, though I will be back in the office in the afternoon, I doubt very much I'll be blogging.
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
master & commander: the far side of the world
This was a bit of an accident from the DVD rental point of view.
I actually watched Master & Commander (M&C) when I was visiting my dad once and I guess I forgot to take it off my rental list afterwards.
M&C is actually an adaptation of a novel in a particularly well loved and popular set of novels that essentially chart the careers of the two main protagonists, Captain Jack Aubrey and the Stephen Maturin who's the ship's surgeon.
The film is also something of an enigma on that front, in that it seems it did okay at the box office, turning a profit; it was quite well reviewed and as I say it's an adaption of one book in a popular series and yet there's never been any more films made. Why was this not the first of a trilogy or possibly even a full franchise?
A quote on Wikipedia suggests that while it did okay at the box office, we're not talking Avengers type popular (or Pirates of the Caribbean might be a better comparison), so sequels never really got off the ground. Also, I know that sea-based shooting is not regarded in favourable light as it's quite difficult to do.
Anyway, the film itself is quite good. The feel and tone is just right and it looks great. The characters also work well and seem quite well fleshed out and clearly motivated. If I was to make one criticism it would be that they're a little generic.
I was going to use the word stereotypical, but I'm not sure that's quite fair. It's more like they're fairly close to archetypes and therefore feel similar to a lot of characters you've seen before. However, they don't feel cliché. The performances are good and they feel subtle and well developed.
The plot is interesting. It kinda launches into the main story with aplomb and there's very little in the way of deviation from that. I mean there are some sub-plots, but they really are subordinate to the main story. However, that main story does meander a bit and, in a way, is more like an overarching goal than a real plot.
It's a little difficult to describe to be honest - it feels more like a slice of (made up) history than a story as such, although it does have beginning middle and end. I guess what I mean is that it does feel like proper historical fiction, rather than just happening to be set in that period.
I actually watched Master & Commander (M&C) when I was visiting my dad once and I guess I forgot to take it off my rental list afterwards.
M&C is actually an adaptation of a novel in a particularly well loved and popular set of novels that essentially chart the careers of the two main protagonists, Captain Jack Aubrey and the Stephen Maturin who's the ship's surgeon.
The film is also something of an enigma on that front, in that it seems it did okay at the box office, turning a profit; it was quite well reviewed and as I say it's an adaption of one book in a popular series and yet there's never been any more films made. Why was this not the first of a trilogy or possibly even a full franchise?
A quote on Wikipedia suggests that while it did okay at the box office, we're not talking Avengers type popular (or Pirates of the Caribbean might be a better comparison), so sequels never really got off the ground. Also, I know that sea-based shooting is not regarded in favourable light as it's quite difficult to do.
Anyway, the film itself is quite good. The feel and tone is just right and it looks great. The characters also work well and seem quite well fleshed out and clearly motivated. If I was to make one criticism it would be that they're a little generic.
I was going to use the word stereotypical, but I'm not sure that's quite fair. It's more like they're fairly close to archetypes and therefore feel similar to a lot of characters you've seen before. However, they don't feel cliché. The performances are good and they feel subtle and well developed.
The plot is interesting. It kinda launches into the main story with aplomb and there's very little in the way of deviation from that. I mean there are some sub-plots, but they really are subordinate to the main story. However, that main story does meander a bit and, in a way, is more like an overarching goal than a real plot.
It's a little difficult to describe to be honest - it feels more like a slice of (made up) history than a story as such, although it does have beginning middle and end. I guess what I mean is that it does feel like proper historical fiction, rather than just happening to be set in that period.
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
complicated weekend
So this last weekend was actually a bit rubbish, which was interesting as it contrasted markedly with the weekend before.
The weekend before went so smoothly as to almost be silly. I had a big old list of chores to do, including cleaning the bedsit and going shopping and everything went so smoothly that I'd done everything by late lunch on Saturday.
This added to the fact that I had the Monday and Tuesday off for the interviews and the weather was rather nice meant it was a rather good weekend.
This last weekend was not so good.
It started going badly on Friday, when I had a particularly bad bout of insomnia, but a lot to do during the day. In the evening I went shopping, but made a bit of an error, in that I bought something for my tea.
Now that normally wouldn't be a bad thing to do, but I forgot I'd brought in a packed lunch, but we'd been to the pub. I therefore had two dinners and had to steak my sandwiches in the fridge and have them Saturday, when I have to confess they were more than a little dried out.
The shopping trip also cost a fortune, because for some reason I decided to get lots of the random or infrequent purchases (for example, the clothes washing tab things I use) all at once. Normally I spread them out more.
Anyway, when I got home I did the usual Friday night bits I do and then started watching the Valencia practice. Only about half way through there were these 3 weird brown outs of the power.
I've no idea what caused it, but it seemed to cause my PVR to go a bit funny. At least I think that was the cause - basically my PVR stopped showing the time when it was on standby. This was a pain, but it also seemed to mean that it wasn't able to switch itself on when it had a programme to record.
Now luckily the majority of what I had to record was overlapped by me having the TV on anyway, but it did mean I lost a radio programme on Sunday (this was how I figured out there was an issue). Luckily the problem seems to have been solved by me doing a "factory reset", but it that means I've lost all my settings. The only one I redid was scanning for channels and a few immediate programme record set ups, so I'll have to do the rest tonight.
Early Saturday morning I did my washing, and that was a bit of a disaster. Basically, they'd shut the water off (well, I say off - it was tiny dribbling trickle), which is kinda an important aspect of a laundrette's facilities.
Now I use one of the big machines for my weekly wash and in some aspects that turned out to be a good thing. The smaller machines that somebody else used just kept going through their cycle, even though there was next to no water. The big machines, it seems, are set up that they'll effectively wait until the water reaches a pre-set level before moving to the next phase. That meant, with the flow rate, that it took well over an hour for what is usually a half-hour programme.
And it only took that long because I drove home several times, filled up a bunch of plastic bottles and poured them into the machine (via the powder slots). If I hadn't done that, god knows how long it would have taken.
My guess is they'd closed the water down because they were doing some repairs on Friday and then forgotten to put it back on again. Certainly when I spoke to the management (it had taken so long they were in - usually I've finished by an hour before they turn up) that seemed to be the implication.
What else?
Oh yeah, for my interview on Friday I have to go somewhere in Oxfordshire and it wasn't very clear where I had to go and I got very nervous. A big part of the nervousness is that I've taken the morning off and the interview is actually starting at 9:00. I was therefore very nervous as to what time I had to set off and if I'd get back in time.
The google maps route was direct, but looked complicated and the alternate route I personally though I could do was a lot longer and was bound to have heavy traffic. I therefore decided to do a trial run, but with all the other delays to stuff I set off really quite late and the return journey was in the dark with it lashing down, which was a bit scary, especially as I was then very tired.
Still, I know the google route now, and it's actually not that bad, though I am going to go very early as it goes through some big towns.
The weekend before went so smoothly as to almost be silly. I had a big old list of chores to do, including cleaning the bedsit and going shopping and everything went so smoothly that I'd done everything by late lunch on Saturday.
This added to the fact that I had the Monday and Tuesday off for the interviews and the weather was rather nice meant it was a rather good weekend.
This last weekend was not so good.
It started going badly on Friday, when I had a particularly bad bout of insomnia, but a lot to do during the day. In the evening I went shopping, but made a bit of an error, in that I bought something for my tea.
Now that normally wouldn't be a bad thing to do, but I forgot I'd brought in a packed lunch, but we'd been to the pub. I therefore had two dinners and had to steak my sandwiches in the fridge and have them Saturday, when I have to confess they were more than a little dried out.
The shopping trip also cost a fortune, because for some reason I decided to get lots of the random or infrequent purchases (for example, the clothes washing tab things I use) all at once. Normally I spread them out more.
Anyway, when I got home I did the usual Friday night bits I do and then started watching the Valencia practice. Only about half way through there were these 3 weird brown outs of the power.
I've no idea what caused it, but it seemed to cause my PVR to go a bit funny. At least I think that was the cause - basically my PVR stopped showing the time when it was on standby. This was a pain, but it also seemed to mean that it wasn't able to switch itself on when it had a programme to record.
Now luckily the majority of what I had to record was overlapped by me having the TV on anyway, but it did mean I lost a radio programme on Sunday (this was how I figured out there was an issue). Luckily the problem seems to have been solved by me doing a "factory reset", but it that means I've lost all my settings. The only one I redid was scanning for channels and a few immediate programme record set ups, so I'll have to do the rest tonight.
Early Saturday morning I did my washing, and that was a bit of a disaster. Basically, they'd shut the water off (well, I say off - it was tiny dribbling trickle), which is kinda an important aspect of a laundrette's facilities.
Now I use one of the big machines for my weekly wash and in some aspects that turned out to be a good thing. The smaller machines that somebody else used just kept going through their cycle, even though there was next to no water. The big machines, it seems, are set up that they'll effectively wait until the water reaches a pre-set level before moving to the next phase. That meant, with the flow rate, that it took well over an hour for what is usually a half-hour programme.
And it only took that long because I drove home several times, filled up a bunch of plastic bottles and poured them into the machine (via the powder slots). If I hadn't done that, god knows how long it would have taken.
My guess is they'd closed the water down because they were doing some repairs on Friday and then forgotten to put it back on again. Certainly when I spoke to the management (it had taken so long they were in - usually I've finished by an hour before they turn up) that seemed to be the implication.
What else?
Oh yeah, for my interview on Friday I have to go somewhere in Oxfordshire and it wasn't very clear where I had to go and I got very nervous. A big part of the nervousness is that I've taken the morning off and the interview is actually starting at 9:00. I was therefore very nervous as to what time I had to set off and if I'd get back in time.
The google maps route was direct, but looked complicated and the alternate route I personally though I could do was a lot longer and was bound to have heavy traffic. I therefore decided to do a trial run, but with all the other delays to stuff I set off really quite late and the return journey was in the dark with it lashing down, which was a bit scary, especially as I was then very tired.
Still, I know the google route now, and it's actually not that bad, though I am going to go very early as it goes through some big towns.
Monday, 25 June 2012
an interesting valencia?
Well Valencia turned out to be an interesting watch, for a change.
There was plenty that happened, including a good deal of overtaking. I think they got the DRS right - it put people in a position to try to overtake, but didn't make it too easy as it does at some races.
The tyres also seemed to play a reasonable part this time, rather than being the total dominating factor as they have in some of the prior races.
The only real shame to it from my point of view was that Lewis had a coming together with Maldonado which saw Lewis into a barrier and Maldonado only losing his nose. It was a real shame, as Lewis had had a really good race.
Now obviously I'm biased as I am a Lewis fan, but Maldonado was clearly the main cause of the accident. This has also been backed by the stewards, who punished him. They have a bit of a history, Lewis and Maldonado and I have to say I think Maldonado is a bit of a prat.
He's clearly not averse to going for other drivers, having deliberately crashed into Lewis at Spa last year and stopped his car in the middle of the track at Monaco this year, in order to try to crash into someone else. That's clearly not sporting behaviour, but it's also outright dangerous.
Crashing into someone in the heat of the moment while trying to pass them is one thing - pre-meditated crashes are another. It's also pretty expensive for the team, to say the least.
In this case there is a bit of a case for Lewis having been quite aggressive with him. He didn't give an inch and, in essence, pushed Maldonado off the circuit, but then that is part of racing. In particular we saw Nico shoving Lewis and Alonso off the track at Bahrain and not getting in trouble. In all of the cases there were clear run-off areas, so it's again been rubber-stamped by the stewards.
To be totally fair to Maldonado I think he was genuinely trying to avoid some speed bumps that there are in that area. It's one of those run-off areas where you could gain quite a bit of advantage by going wide so they've put in some speed humps that mean you need to slow right down to drive around them or face the risk of damaging the car.
In other words, I'm not sure he deliberately slammed into Lewis so much as tried to avoid the bumps, which then slewed him into Lewis.
However, really, as I say, he should have slowed down and gone around them - Lewis was always going to be on that bit of the track, so by doing what he did a collision was inevitable.
Lewis was clearly not happy, but he'd also clearly been strongly briefed not to say anything. I'm not sure about that - one of the things I like about Lewis is he speaks his mind and, especially here where the other guy is in the wrong, in some ways it's a shame he was suppressed. Still, the Monaco thing where he said some silly stuff was probably going a bit far.
There was plenty that happened, including a good deal of overtaking. I think they got the DRS right - it put people in a position to try to overtake, but didn't make it too easy as it does at some races.
The tyres also seemed to play a reasonable part this time, rather than being the total dominating factor as they have in some of the prior races.
The only real shame to it from my point of view was that Lewis had a coming together with Maldonado which saw Lewis into a barrier and Maldonado only losing his nose. It was a real shame, as Lewis had had a really good race.
Now obviously I'm biased as I am a Lewis fan, but Maldonado was clearly the main cause of the accident. This has also been backed by the stewards, who punished him. They have a bit of a history, Lewis and Maldonado and I have to say I think Maldonado is a bit of a prat.
He's clearly not averse to going for other drivers, having deliberately crashed into Lewis at Spa last year and stopped his car in the middle of the track at Monaco this year, in order to try to crash into someone else. That's clearly not sporting behaviour, but it's also outright dangerous.
Crashing into someone in the heat of the moment while trying to pass them is one thing - pre-meditated crashes are another. It's also pretty expensive for the team, to say the least.
In this case there is a bit of a case for Lewis having been quite aggressive with him. He didn't give an inch and, in essence, pushed Maldonado off the circuit, but then that is part of racing. In particular we saw Nico shoving Lewis and Alonso off the track at Bahrain and not getting in trouble. In all of the cases there were clear run-off areas, so it's again been rubber-stamped by the stewards.
To be totally fair to Maldonado I think he was genuinely trying to avoid some speed bumps that there are in that area. It's one of those run-off areas where you could gain quite a bit of advantage by going wide so they've put in some speed humps that mean you need to slow right down to drive around them or face the risk of damaging the car.
In other words, I'm not sure he deliberately slammed into Lewis so much as tried to avoid the bumps, which then slewed him into Lewis.
However, really, as I say, he should have slowed down and gone around them - Lewis was always going to be on that bit of the track, so by doing what he did a collision was inevitable.
Lewis was clearly not happy, but he'd also clearly been strongly briefed not to say anything. I'm not sure about that - one of the things I like about Lewis is he speaks his mind and, especially here where the other guy is in the wrong, in some ways it's a shame he was suppressed. Still, the Monaco thing where he said some silly stuff was probably going a bit far.
Friday, 22 June 2012
wakey, wakey
I was up at a stupid time again this morning.
3AM this time.
I've discussed it before, but this time of year is terrible for me because it doesn't get dark until really late and I find brightness the most difficult thing to overcome when trying to get to sleep. But then, as a double whammy, it gets light super early as well, so a bit of my body clock kicks in when it sees the brightness and goes "it's morning, wake up."
The real problem when waking up at 3AM is that for the first few hours while I lay there I feel totally wide awake and alert. This makes it impossible to get back to sleep. I therefore try doing something else, like watch recorded TV or read.
However, after a few hours this initial wide awake feeling wears off, but by then it's generally too late to try to get back to sleep. I therefore end up getting up and going to work.
I got to work at 7AM this morning. But what makes this horrible is that we don't work flexi, so I can't then go home at 4PM or anything - No, I'm here for the best part of 12 hours.
The other problem I have this summer is I'm trying to find a new job so that's throwing into the mix two things - nervousness and excitement. Naturally I'm nervous when doing interviews and nervous about my current employer finding out I'm looking for a job. But I'm also finding it all quite exciting - new possibilities are opening up for me and I'm actually quite enjoying it (as well as also, obviously being nervous about that too - what if I make the wrong decision?).
On that front I've gotten another interview arranged for next Friday. This one actually seems like a bit of an off the wall choice, but it seems all the more interesting for it.
It's the Valencia Grand Pr... *snore* - Oh, sorry, drifted off then. Could be the lack of sleep, but I'm guessing it's more likely to be an attempt at a humorous reference to how terribly boring the Valencia Grand Prix usually is.
You never know, the tyres may liven it up, or we may get yet another winner. Who knows, maybe there's been some secret cabalistic agreement that all the drivers get to win this year? If so they've made a bit of an error of judgment as there are only 24 drivers and only 20 races!
3AM this time.
I've discussed it before, but this time of year is terrible for me because it doesn't get dark until really late and I find brightness the most difficult thing to overcome when trying to get to sleep. But then, as a double whammy, it gets light super early as well, so a bit of my body clock kicks in when it sees the brightness and goes "it's morning, wake up."
The real problem when waking up at 3AM is that for the first few hours while I lay there I feel totally wide awake and alert. This makes it impossible to get back to sleep. I therefore try doing something else, like watch recorded TV or read.
However, after a few hours this initial wide awake feeling wears off, but by then it's generally too late to try to get back to sleep. I therefore end up getting up and going to work.
I got to work at 7AM this morning. But what makes this horrible is that we don't work flexi, so I can't then go home at 4PM or anything - No, I'm here for the best part of 12 hours.
The other problem I have this summer is I'm trying to find a new job so that's throwing into the mix two things - nervousness and excitement. Naturally I'm nervous when doing interviews and nervous about my current employer finding out I'm looking for a job. But I'm also finding it all quite exciting - new possibilities are opening up for me and I'm actually quite enjoying it (as well as also, obviously being nervous about that too - what if I make the wrong decision?).
On that front I've gotten another interview arranged for next Friday. This one actually seems like a bit of an off the wall choice, but it seems all the more interesting for it.
It's the Valencia Grand Pr... *snore* - Oh, sorry, drifted off then. Could be the lack of sleep, but I'm guessing it's more likely to be an attempt at a humorous reference to how terribly boring the Valencia Grand Prix usually is.
You never know, the tyres may liven it up, or we may get yet another winner. Who knows, maybe there's been some secret cabalistic agreement that all the drivers get to win this year? If so they've made a bit of an error of judgment as there are only 24 drivers and only 20 races!
Thursday, 21 June 2012
2 fast 2 furious
So this was the first sequel to the fast and the furious.
It's also actually pretty difficult to review, since almost anything I could say I've said about the other two fast and furious films I've watched, since it is very similar to the other films. It is, in a word, formulaic.
I guess the real highlight of the film is the cars and the driving about and racing. Generally in this film the cars feel a bit more realistic, I guess. They don't do quite as many stupid things with them, although there is still plenty of stupid.
The other highlight here is the buddy-buddy relationship between the two leads. This works surprisingly well, though it's riddled with cliché and is a long way from original. However it is quite entertaining.
Let's see, what else?
I guess there's the plot. It's just as daft as in previous films and makes little to no real sense. But then it would be shocking if it did.
There seemed to be slightly less in the way of cheesecake and hot babes. I'm not sure if this was a real shift or intentional in any way. I know these films have quite a large female fanbase as well, so perhaps there was a conscious decision to tone that element down, although it's not gone altogether.
One thing that is clear is that the budget was obviously higher. The stunts are more spectacular and clearly a lot more money has been spent on the production as a whole. Given the type of film this is that means it does tick the boxes in a better way.
The only real problem with the film is a lack of Vin Diesel. I mean, the stuff that's here is fine, but without the Vin Diesel aspect it didn't quite feel like a Fast and Furious film.
So yeah, I'd say if you were into cars it's a good film to check out. If you like brain dead action films then it's okay too. Otherwise it's probably one to steer clear of.
It's also actually pretty difficult to review, since almost anything I could say I've said about the other two fast and furious films I've watched, since it is very similar to the other films. It is, in a word, formulaic.
I guess the real highlight of the film is the cars and the driving about and racing. Generally in this film the cars feel a bit more realistic, I guess. They don't do quite as many stupid things with them, although there is still plenty of stupid.
The other highlight here is the buddy-buddy relationship between the two leads. This works surprisingly well, though it's riddled with cliché and is a long way from original. However it is quite entertaining.
Let's see, what else?
I guess there's the plot. It's just as daft as in previous films and makes little to no real sense. But then it would be shocking if it did.
There seemed to be slightly less in the way of cheesecake and hot babes. I'm not sure if this was a real shift or intentional in any way. I know these films have quite a large female fanbase as well, so perhaps there was a conscious decision to tone that element down, although it's not gone altogether.
One thing that is clear is that the budget was obviously higher. The stunts are more spectacular and clearly a lot more money has been spent on the production as a whole. Given the type of film this is that means it does tick the boxes in a better way.
The only real problem with the film is a lack of Vin Diesel. I mean, the stuff that's here is fine, but without the Vin Diesel aspect it didn't quite feel like a Fast and Furious film.
So yeah, I'd say if you were into cars it's a good film to check out. If you like brain dead action films then it's okay too. Otherwise it's probably one to steer clear of.
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
shattered
Well, I'm back at work after my whirlwind tour of interviews.
Okay, there were only 2 interviews, but it's left me drained. I say that, but the drained feeling may be something to do with waking up at 4AM this morning and being unable to get back to sleep (to the extent I go bored and watched some recorded TV instead).
I mean I blame the interviews for the lack of sleep anyway - it's all been quite disruptive to my routines, to say the least.
Anyway, point is I had two interviews. One was in Sutton, which is in London... or Surrey. It was a bit confusing, to be honest, as their address said Surrey, but maps say it's Greater London and there were all these London 2012 banners up like in the rest of London.
I mention this mainly because it would have to be a serious consideration for taking the job. I've always tried to avoid big cities and London in particular. I'm just not a fan of places without lots of green and gaps between the houses. However, Sutton actually seemed quite green - there were a couple of parks close by and there were a surprising number of trees.
It was quite... multi-culturally. I'm not saying that in a racist way, it's just it's quite a shift from where I am currently and again backs up the idea of it being London, rather than Surrey.
Anyway, the interview went well, I felt. Indeed it went better than I was expecting. I'd been a bit put off with how they'd treated me in arranging the interview. There does appear to be a reason for that to some degree in that this job is to replace someone who leaves very soon. Most of the other jobs appear to be newly created.
It was also a bit more senior than I was expecting - I would have an assistant (blimey!). To be honest it became clear to me I'd gotten a bit confused as to which job it was. The problem is most of these jobs have identical descriptions and I had forgotten this was for one of the few that was slightly different.
The focus of the role wouldn't be writing the reviews as such, but more doing Quality Control of them and helping to maintain a bid library - that sort of thing.
As I say, the interview went well, but I'd have to think long and hard about whether I want to move to London (or closer to London, anyway).
The second interview was almost the flip-side of that. Where the first one I went in thinking it wouldn't be for me but then coming out thinking maybe it would, this second one I went in thinking this is where I want to go and came out thinking perhaps not.
Part of the issue in both cases were the people. In the first the person who'd got my back up was actually HR and wasn't anything to do with the interview itself. In the second the issue was more like the top boss was on my side, but the top colleague was not keen.
The second interview was in Cambridge, which I have a little familiarity with. It's obviously a lot more pleasant a place than London, but I understand it's about as expensive; housing wise in particular.
The real problem with it is that it's quite technical and this guy pounced on the fact I didn't know anything about that technical area. He also seemed to not quite get the fact that I want to go in that direction - my point that I wanted to go in that direction, but appreciated I'd be coming in cold / from scratch and would need to learn everything seemed to be a real stumbling block.
Now as I say I always thought it would be, but I dunno, it was like he didn't believe me. It was also a little annoying in that they both asked the same questions one after the other - like the second guy hadn't listened to what I'd said.
However I've just heard they want to do a second interview. Well, I say interview - it sounds more like they want to give me a test about the technical area, so I need to learn about it.
I have to say I'm not that impressed by this - okay, it's a weakness, but I'm left a little puzzled as to what they're trying to achieve by doing it. I'm hardly going to become an expert in a short amount of time.
I mean, the first interview wants me to take some online test things, but that's okay, because they're of a more general nature.
Okay, there were only 2 interviews, but it's left me drained. I say that, but the drained feeling may be something to do with waking up at 4AM this morning and being unable to get back to sleep (to the extent I go bored and watched some recorded TV instead).
I mean I blame the interviews for the lack of sleep anyway - it's all been quite disruptive to my routines, to say the least.
Anyway, point is I had two interviews. One was in Sutton, which is in London... or Surrey. It was a bit confusing, to be honest, as their address said Surrey, but maps say it's Greater London and there were all these London 2012 banners up like in the rest of London.
I mention this mainly because it would have to be a serious consideration for taking the job. I've always tried to avoid big cities and London in particular. I'm just not a fan of places without lots of green and gaps between the houses. However, Sutton actually seemed quite green - there were a couple of parks close by and there were a surprising number of trees.
It was quite... multi-culturally. I'm not saying that in a racist way, it's just it's quite a shift from where I am currently and again backs up the idea of it being London, rather than Surrey.
Anyway, the interview went well, I felt. Indeed it went better than I was expecting. I'd been a bit put off with how they'd treated me in arranging the interview. There does appear to be a reason for that to some degree in that this job is to replace someone who leaves very soon. Most of the other jobs appear to be newly created.
It was also a bit more senior than I was expecting - I would have an assistant (blimey!). To be honest it became clear to me I'd gotten a bit confused as to which job it was. The problem is most of these jobs have identical descriptions and I had forgotten this was for one of the few that was slightly different.
The focus of the role wouldn't be writing the reviews as such, but more doing Quality Control of them and helping to maintain a bid library - that sort of thing.
As I say, the interview went well, but I'd have to think long and hard about whether I want to move to London (or closer to London, anyway).
The second interview was almost the flip-side of that. Where the first one I went in thinking it wouldn't be for me but then coming out thinking maybe it would, this second one I went in thinking this is where I want to go and came out thinking perhaps not.
Part of the issue in both cases were the people. In the first the person who'd got my back up was actually HR and wasn't anything to do with the interview itself. In the second the issue was more like the top boss was on my side, but the top colleague was not keen.
The second interview was in Cambridge, which I have a little familiarity with. It's obviously a lot more pleasant a place than London, but I understand it's about as expensive; housing wise in particular.
The real problem with it is that it's quite technical and this guy pounced on the fact I didn't know anything about that technical area. He also seemed to not quite get the fact that I want to go in that direction - my point that I wanted to go in that direction, but appreciated I'd be coming in cold / from scratch and would need to learn everything seemed to be a real stumbling block.
Now as I say I always thought it would be, but I dunno, it was like he didn't believe me. It was also a little annoying in that they both asked the same questions one after the other - like the second guy hadn't listened to what I'd said.
However I've just heard they want to do a second interview. Well, I say interview - it sounds more like they want to give me a test about the technical area, so I need to learn about it.
I have to say I'm not that impressed by this - okay, it's a weakness, but I'm left a little puzzled as to what they're trying to achieve by doing it. I'm hardly going to become an expert in a short amount of time.
I mean, the first interview wants me to take some online test things, but that's okay, because they're of a more general nature.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)