It's the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix this weekend.
I can't say I'm particularly looking forward to it as it's not really produced any classics so far. It's one of the newer races and it's also one of the duller ones.
From memory it's held in the evening, so it starts out fairly light but the sun sets during the race and it's dark at the end. This doesn't really add much to the race, but I guess it's something different.
It's also the circuit where it goes under the weird hotel which has loads of glowing lights on it. Also, the exit from the pits is a tunnel. Again, neither really add anything to the race, but it's something a bit different.
It's also the second to last grand prix. The season is way too long this year - the last race is Brazil, which is usually a good race, but it's way out at the end of November and the new season starts mid-March next year.
I appreciate with F1 being a properly global sport you can go on for a long time, but I think it's kinda reached a maximum length this year. Also, by adding more races you actually amplify the effect of dominance. So this year there have been lots of races where Vettel has already won the title.
To be honest, I don't think it matters as much in F1 - they still want to win each race, but the heat does go out of it a little.
Other plans for the weekend are... to be honest, I'm not sure. I know I need to do a big shop and one of the things I did do when I got back of holiday was identify a bunch of stuff for e-baying.
In fact I'm actually almost out of stuff I could put on e-bay in the shed. Indeed, I've actually got loads of empty stacking boxes in the shed that I've positioned to give the illusion that the space is has still got loads in it, but actually they're mostly empty.
Well, I say that - there's still quite a bit I could get rid of, it's just it would take quite a lot of sorting out, and I'd say half of what's left is really only tip-worthy if I was forced to dispose of it.
Also I've actually cheated. I've brought all of my manga in and stacked it up on top of my smaller set of shelves.
I do actually want to sell most of these titles, it's just that I'm either waiting for them to finish (which could take a few years in some cases :/) or to get a good chunk that I can sell as a batch (1-10 say) and then when new volumes turn up I'll sell them individually.
This doesn't get me such good prices, but it reduces the amount of stuff I've got hanging about.
Oh, I also made a bit of a decision - I want to rip some of the DVDs I've got so that I can get the originals on e-bay. Having spent quite a lot of time recently sorting through things there's a lot that clearly isn't going to be of "classic - must keep" status so I think I'll rip them and sell them.
That does mean I need to work out a quick, easy and efficient way of doing that. And of course it means there's a weird bit of transference going on - I won't be doing what I really need to (watching stuff) but I'll still be able to sell it :/. Also, I'm going to spend hours (?) ripping it when I could be watching it... ?
Friday, 11 November 2011
Wednesday, 9 November 2011
indian grand prix
The Indian Grand Prix was on while I was away.
In fact it was on while I was at my Dads and so I watched it down there.
I have to confess it wasn't the greatest of races - there was very little overtaking (mostly the rubbish DRS type overtaking) and not much really seemed to happen. I think there were a couple of reasons for this dullness.
Firstly, and probably most crucially, Pirelli brought the wrong tyres. They basically said they were being conservative, so the tyres they brought were harder than they really needed to be. This meant they lasted ages and it kinda took us back to the situation for the last few years.
In a way this was a good reminder of the great things the Pirelli tyres have done for the racing this year, but in a more important way it meant that they didn't really have to worry about the tyres and could all just do one stop pretty much when they wanted too.
So next year a much less conservative approach please.
Another problem was the incredible dust. To be fair the circuit is new, so a bit of construction dust is to be expected, but I also think they've built it in a place that's quite dry and dusty, which bodes less well for future years.
The dust meant that going off line (which is what you have to do to overtake) quickly coated your tyres in dust, meaning you'd loose grip and therefore struggle to overtake.
What they need to do next year is get some of those jet washers and clean it up a bit (they even have these at Silverstone).
Another problem, I think, was it's yet another circuit where they've gone for gigantic straights. I really don't understand the obsession with giant straights. I mean, I guess they're okay for more normal cars which take a while to get up to top speed, but maximum straight line sped (vmax) s achieved incredibly quickly in F1 cars (and most other formulas).
I mean that's the point - they're very fast, very light cars, so they can hit top speed quickly. The bit that's interesting is the corners - cornering speed is where you gain real lap time and it's also where F1 cars excel. Nothing corners like an F1 car.
And of course if you're going to have some huge straights you reduce the number of corners.
Another issue was that I think they overhyped the circuit. It's brand new and it's Tilka, who has built most of the new circuit, most of which are rubbish, but everyone was saying this layout was great and there'd be loads of overtaking, but there wasn't
To be fait it did look like an interesting circuit and elevation and super wide corners designed to help overtaking, yet in the end it just didn't seem to work.
Well it was only the first year and so perhaps next year will be better.
Note that tomorrow I'm away in Liverpool all day (it's going to be a really long day) so no post tomorrow.
In fact it was on while I was at my Dads and so I watched it down there.
I have to confess it wasn't the greatest of races - there was very little overtaking (mostly the rubbish DRS type overtaking) and not much really seemed to happen. I think there were a couple of reasons for this dullness.
Firstly, and probably most crucially, Pirelli brought the wrong tyres. They basically said they were being conservative, so the tyres they brought were harder than they really needed to be. This meant they lasted ages and it kinda took us back to the situation for the last few years.
In a way this was a good reminder of the great things the Pirelli tyres have done for the racing this year, but in a more important way it meant that they didn't really have to worry about the tyres and could all just do one stop pretty much when they wanted too.
So next year a much less conservative approach please.
Another problem was the incredible dust. To be fair the circuit is new, so a bit of construction dust is to be expected, but I also think they've built it in a place that's quite dry and dusty, which bodes less well for future years.
The dust meant that going off line (which is what you have to do to overtake) quickly coated your tyres in dust, meaning you'd loose grip and therefore struggle to overtake.
What they need to do next year is get some of those jet washers and clean it up a bit (they even have these at Silverstone).
Another problem, I think, was it's yet another circuit where they've gone for gigantic straights. I really don't understand the obsession with giant straights. I mean, I guess they're okay for more normal cars which take a while to get up to top speed, but maximum straight line sped (vmax) s achieved incredibly quickly in F1 cars (and most other formulas).
I mean that's the point - they're very fast, very light cars, so they can hit top speed quickly. The bit that's interesting is the corners - cornering speed is where you gain real lap time and it's also where F1 cars excel. Nothing corners like an F1 car.
And of course if you're going to have some huge straights you reduce the number of corners.
Another issue was that I think they overhyped the circuit. It's brand new and it's Tilka, who has built most of the new circuit, most of which are rubbish, but everyone was saying this layout was great and there'd be loads of overtaking, but there wasn't
To be fait it did look like an interesting circuit and elevation and super wide corners designed to help overtaking, yet in the end it just didn't seem to work.
Well it was only the first year and so perhaps next year will be better.
Note that tomorrow I'm away in Liverpool all day (it's going to be a really long day) so no post tomorrow.
Tuesday, 8 November 2011
no water
So I got back last night and discovered there was no water.
I knocked on my landlord's door, thinking he may have turned it off and forgotten to turn it back on (I'll explain why in a future blog post), but actually it turned out there's a burst main and there's no water for the whole street. It had, apparently, been off for more than four hours at that point already.
Why does this stuff always happen to me at the worst possible times?
I mean, I've lived there six years and at no point has the water been shut off (the heater for the hot water has failed occasionally, but that's it) but now, the very day before I have an important meeting the water is totally gone.
And that's the thing I missed.
Water to drink being gone was annoying (I like to drink quite a lot of water) but copable with - I have bottled water, milk and other stuff - but water to do things like wash up, have a shower with, shave with and even use to clean your teeth is really difficult to replace. And as for flushing the loo... well.
But the real key is this was happening the night before I've got an important meeting. I mean, why now? The odds must be astronomical.
And given the amount I sweat during the night I couldn't really get away with not washing at all.
I decided to leave a tap on so that if and when it did come back on and luckily at about 9:00 it sputtered into life.
Of course the water that came out of it was a horrible muddy brown, and the hot water had been emptied so that glugged and gurgled as it filled up for several hours. However, in the morning I was able to take a shower and do some of the other water dependent things, so that was good.
The cold water in the morning wasn't brown any more, but it was full of bubbles and it tasted a bit funny. Hopefully I can run it through a bit tonight and it will clean up and be okay.
I guess somewhere in there is a big indicator of my personality - my reaction was "why is it always me? and why now?" but I could be reacting in a "lucky it got fixed in time" way.
I knocked on my landlord's door, thinking he may have turned it off and forgotten to turn it back on (I'll explain why in a future blog post), but actually it turned out there's a burst main and there's no water for the whole street. It had, apparently, been off for more than four hours at that point already.
Why does this stuff always happen to me at the worst possible times?
I mean, I've lived there six years and at no point has the water been shut off (the heater for the hot water has failed occasionally, but that's it) but now, the very day before I have an important meeting the water is totally gone.
And that's the thing I missed.
Water to drink being gone was annoying (I like to drink quite a lot of water) but copable with - I have bottled water, milk and other stuff - but water to do things like wash up, have a shower with, shave with and even use to clean your teeth is really difficult to replace. And as for flushing the loo... well.
But the real key is this was happening the night before I've got an important meeting. I mean, why now? The odds must be astronomical.
And given the amount I sweat during the night I couldn't really get away with not washing at all.
I decided to leave a tap on so that if and when it did come back on and luckily at about 9:00 it sputtered into life.
Of course the water that came out of it was a horrible muddy brown, and the hot water had been emptied so that glugged and gurgled as it filled up for several hours. However, in the morning I was able to take a shower and do some of the other water dependent things, so that was good.
The cold water in the morning wasn't brown any more, but it was full of bubbles and it tasted a bit funny. Hopefully I can run it through a bit tonight and it will clean up and be okay.
I guess somewhere in there is a big indicator of my personality - my reaction was "why is it always me? and why now?" but I could be reacting in a "lucky it got fixed in time" way.
Monday, 7 November 2011
holiday
So, back to work today.
Can't say I enjoyed it.
I dunno, normally I'm pretty happy to go back, but this time it just felt like the worst thing ever.
Part of the problem was that the holiday just flew by. It really doesn't feel like I've been away for more than a day or two, but I've actually been off for more than a week.
The first part of the holiday as spent at my Dads - Friday to Monday, and I think this was too long. Not that I don't like seeing him, it's just it meant that the Friday and Monday were pretty much right offs.
And when I visit my dad it doesn't really feel like holiday proper. So, in a way I sort of had a weekend at my Dad's and then a four day holiday, making it not feel like long enough.
Anther reason is that the holiday wasn't really very good. The weather was a bit meh (cloudy and drizzly and foggy for most of it and it was just the wrong side of chilly) and I didn't really seem to enjoy it very much. I kept thinking about work stuff and as I say I "lost" a few days.
Usually I go at the beginning of October / end September and the weather is much better - just the right side of chilly, usually at least a few sunny days.
Also, the clocks changed while I was on holiday. While this technically gave me an extra hour, I always find it a confusing experience when the clocks change. Also, it meant that it suddenly switched to getting dark really early and that made all the days feel very short.
And I didn't really seem to get any of the other stuff done - I didn't pre-write any blog entries, didn't watch hardly anything on DVD, didn't read a single page of any books. The only thing I did do was read plenty of manga and that was silly in a way as it's not really something I struggle to do normally.
One thing I would say is the walking and diet went pretty well. This time I'd planned to eat some specific bad things (clotted cream teas, 1 Burger King meal and 1 McDonalds) and I think because I'd included them in the plan I didn't go nuts on the other days. I also walked loads and so still managed to loose about 2 pounds despite eating those bits of rubbish.
When I got back things seemed to be manic - it took ages to unpack and there was loads of stuff for me to catch up on. Plus it was a cleaning weekend, so that was on top of all the regular stuff.
I've also come back on a Monday so I've the prospect of a full week at work. I usually try to stagger holiday so it's a half week once I'm back, but I don't have the days to spare this year. That's partly because of the Grand Prix holiday, which, although greatly enjoyable, has kinda made a bit of a mess of my holiday timings for the rest f the year.
I'd also kinda hoped that someone who was filling in for me while I was away would clear up a few niggling jobs I haven't had the time to deal with, but when I got back I found they hadn't done any of them. I mean, I don't blame them, it's just it would have been nice if at least a few had been done and I could focus on the bigger stuff (which didn't really seem to have advanced any further either, which I'm less pleased about).
To be frank, I'm in a bit of a "roll on Christmas" mood. I think I may take quite a long Chrimbo holiday this year.
Thursday, 27 October 2011
last day
So today is my last day in the office for a while.
I'm off on holiday, but it's nothing spectacular - I'm going down to Devon. Initially I'll be seeing my dad over the weekend and then I'm booked in to a travel lodge until the end of the week.
IT was my dad's birthday at the beginning of the month, which is why I want to see him, but I've also not seen him since the British Grand Prix back in July, so that will be nice. It's also a Grand Prix weekend, with the Indian Grand Prix on.
India is new this year, so it will be interesting to see what the circuit is like and how the racing is. Both of the championships are well over after Red Bull wrapped up the constructors championship at Korea. Now it's all just about who can win the races. Some people tend to think as soon as the season's over that's it, but of course in reality, the drivers and teams want to win every race they go to - otherwise why turn up?
Plus, since there are very few rule changes next season, it follows the cars won't be hugely different and it will be important to keep momentum up for the beginning o f the next season.
Anyway, after that I'll stay in a travelodge for a few days. The idea there is I'm going to do lots of walking. This is the same pattern I've done a few times now and it works quite well, so long as I can resist the temptation of eating lots of junk food. I mean, I'll have a couple of treats, but if I can avoid eating junk continuously I should be able to concentrate on loosing a few pounds.
I will also use the opportunity to watch a load of DVDs and read a bunch of manga. I'm hoping that I'll be able to watch a few films mainly so that I can then e-bay them when I get back. t would be nice to eat a chunk of unwatched stuff away.
Also, while I'm away my landlord is apparently going to install a new radiator in the flat. The idea is they're going to run the pipes across from his place and put the radiator in the living room/bed area.
The hope is this will cut a big chunk out of my heating costs (now that it's turned chilly I'm starting to put the radiator on), although I'm not getting it for free - it's costing me £5 extra month in rent, and while that may seem a bargain, it's not quite as good as that, because of course during spring, summer and early autumn I don't use heating at all and of course the rise is across the full year, not just the winter months.
Still, it should represent better value at least.
I think he's also a bit concerned about the possibility of pipes bursting. By putting a bit of heating it should stave off the cold a bit, so it's a preventative thing - clearing up after flooding would not be cheap.
I'm off on holiday, but it's nothing spectacular - I'm going down to Devon. Initially I'll be seeing my dad over the weekend and then I'm booked in to a travel lodge until the end of the week.
IT was my dad's birthday at the beginning of the month, which is why I want to see him, but I've also not seen him since the British Grand Prix back in July, so that will be nice. It's also a Grand Prix weekend, with the Indian Grand Prix on.
India is new this year, so it will be interesting to see what the circuit is like and how the racing is. Both of the championships are well over after Red Bull wrapped up the constructors championship at Korea. Now it's all just about who can win the races. Some people tend to think as soon as the season's over that's it, but of course in reality, the drivers and teams want to win every race they go to - otherwise why turn up?
Plus, since there are very few rule changes next season, it follows the cars won't be hugely different and it will be important to keep momentum up for the beginning o f the next season.
Anyway, after that I'll stay in a travelodge for a few days. The idea there is I'm going to do lots of walking. This is the same pattern I've done a few times now and it works quite well, so long as I can resist the temptation of eating lots of junk food. I mean, I'll have a couple of treats, but if I can avoid eating junk continuously I should be able to concentrate on loosing a few pounds.
I will also use the opportunity to watch a load of DVDs and read a bunch of manga. I'm hoping that I'll be able to watch a few films mainly so that I can then e-bay them when I get back. t would be nice to eat a chunk of unwatched stuff away.
Also, while I'm away my landlord is apparently going to install a new radiator in the flat. The idea is they're going to run the pipes across from his place and put the radiator in the living room/bed area.
The hope is this will cut a big chunk out of my heating costs (now that it's turned chilly I'm starting to put the radiator on), although I'm not getting it for free - it's costing me £5 extra month in rent, and while that may seem a bargain, it's not quite as good as that, because of course during spring, summer and early autumn I don't use heating at all and of course the rise is across the full year, not just the winter months.
Still, it should represent better value at least.
I think he's also a bit concerned about the possibility of pipes bursting. By putting a bit of heating it should stave off the cold a bit, so it's a preventative thing - clearing up after flooding would not be cheap.
Wednesday, 26 October 2011
black swan
There are some things on my rental list where I'm really not all that sure why they're there.
Black Swan was one of those things. I mean, I'd heard good things about it, but I can't say that the thought of watching a film about Ballet was really very high up on my list of things I want to do.
I can't really be doing with Ballet.
Well, to be totally honest I can't really doing with dance.
Oh, I've no objection to people dancing and enjoying themselves, it's the whole formalised types of dance I can't be doing with - if it has a proper name and things like "forms" it probably doesn't do anything for me.
Which, to some extent, is hypocritical, as, in general, dancers (general dancers like you see on X-Factor and the like) are almost universally "well fit".
And perhaps that's the real root of why I don't like ballet - it seems to be one of those things that acts like a grindstone, grinding away at the people involved. In particular it seems to be something that involves impressionable young girls being forced (or, at least, forcing themselves) to do horrible things to themselves - keep themselves horribly thin and dance around with their whole weight supported just on the tips of their toes.
Oh, I'm sure the reality isn't wholly like that, and those are those are clichés, but the other issues is it falls into that whole world of classical music and opera that takes itself too seriously. It taps into that whole thing of formality and "proper" ways of doing things that just rubs me up the wrong way.
Sorry, I got a bit carried away, but that's kinda the point - despite hearing good things, when this turned up I was hardly desperate to get it into the DVD player and watch it.
But I was rather wrong. Well, no, actually I was partly right in that it really is about ballet, but it's also a psychological thriller of all things. Which I was not expecting at all.
The ballet is key to it - this isn't just a thriller that happens to be set in and around a ballet performance or anything like that. Indeed, the key element - the "black swan" (from Swan Lake) of the title - is core to both the ballet and the psychological thriller elements.
I think if you know a bit about ballet you'll probably enjoy the film even more - apart from knowing that there is such a thing as Swan Lake (which was created by Tchaikovsky, who virtually rejuvenated ballet as an art form) I don't really know what it's about. So I'd say a quick trip over to wikipedia beforehand if you don't know about it would probably be the way round to do it - I looked it up afterwards, and realised there was a lot of clever stuff in there.
I seem to have rambled on quite a bit. Basically, what I'm trying to get around to is that, yes the Ballet is important and knowing a bit about it helps, but the psychological thriller part is the key bit and it's a really good film as a result.
It does leave quite a few questions unanswered, but I always think that's a good thing in a psychological thriller. Leaving it up to you to work out what happened is always the best way to go, in my opinion.
I'm not sure if that counts as a spoiler as such, but one thing I would also say is that the film really reminded me of the anime film Perfect Blue by Satoshi Kon. Which is a good thing.
Black Swan was one of those things. I mean, I'd heard good things about it, but I can't say that the thought of watching a film about Ballet was really very high up on my list of things I want to do.
I can't really be doing with Ballet.
Well, to be totally honest I can't really doing with dance.
Oh, I've no objection to people dancing and enjoying themselves, it's the whole formalised types of dance I can't be doing with - if it has a proper name and things like "forms" it probably doesn't do anything for me.
Which, to some extent, is hypocritical, as, in general, dancers (general dancers like you see on X-Factor and the like) are almost universally "well fit".
And perhaps that's the real root of why I don't like ballet - it seems to be one of those things that acts like a grindstone, grinding away at the people involved. In particular it seems to be something that involves impressionable young girls being forced (or, at least, forcing themselves) to do horrible things to themselves - keep themselves horribly thin and dance around with their whole weight supported just on the tips of their toes.
Oh, I'm sure the reality isn't wholly like that, and those are those are clichés, but the other issues is it falls into that whole world of classical music and opera that takes itself too seriously. It taps into that whole thing of formality and "proper" ways of doing things that just rubs me up the wrong way.
Sorry, I got a bit carried away, but that's kinda the point - despite hearing good things, when this turned up I was hardly desperate to get it into the DVD player and watch it.
But I was rather wrong. Well, no, actually I was partly right in that it really is about ballet, but it's also a psychological thriller of all things. Which I was not expecting at all.
The ballet is key to it - this isn't just a thriller that happens to be set in and around a ballet performance or anything like that. Indeed, the key element - the "black swan" (from Swan Lake) of the title - is core to both the ballet and the psychological thriller elements.
I think if you know a bit about ballet you'll probably enjoy the film even more - apart from knowing that there is such a thing as Swan Lake (which was created by Tchaikovsky, who virtually rejuvenated ballet as an art form) I don't really know what it's about. So I'd say a quick trip over to wikipedia beforehand if you don't know about it would probably be the way round to do it - I looked it up afterwards, and realised there was a lot of clever stuff in there.
I seem to have rambled on quite a bit. Basically, what I'm trying to get around to is that, yes the Ballet is important and knowing a bit about it helps, but the psychological thriller part is the key bit and it's a really good film as a result.
It does leave quite a few questions unanswered, but I always think that's a good thing in a psychological thriller. Leaving it up to you to work out what happened is always the best way to go, in my opinion.
I'm not sure if that counts as a spoiler as such, but one thing I would also say is that the film really reminded me of the anime film Perfect Blue by Satoshi Kon. Which is a good thing.
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
source code
With the lack of posting I naturally also got a bit behind with posting reviews of stuff.
It's actually a short week for me as I'm off on holiday Friday (thank god) so I thought I'd post reviews today and tomorrow before wrapping the week up.
So a few weeks back I watched source code.
I actually quite enjoyed it, but I'll actually start at the end, if you see what I mean.
No, I don't either - what I mean is, I'll run through my thoughts as soon as the film ended. They went a bit like this:
"Well that was quite good. Bit of a paradoxical ending, but then the whole thing was a bit paradoxical. And if you go with m theory I guess it's not a paradox in a way.
"Actually, you know they could even make a sequel. Actually, I think it would make a better TV series. You could well imagine him popping into different people each episode and solving a different problem.
"Where have I heard that before? Wasn't that what happened in Quantum Leap? Hang on, the whole thing is really like Quantum Leap, isn't it?"
So I should explain a few things. The film doesn't quite join all the dots in terms of what's happening, but it seems to make use of m theory. M theory is one f those areas of physics that strays right into science fiction territory. It's basically the idea of multiple dimensions.
So in this film they're essentially using m-theory to repeatedly bounce into dimensions (or, potentially, they're creating them - as I say, it doesn't fully explain things) that are only fractionally different to ours and then find out the answer to a particular question. I won't go too much into the detail as it would spoiler things a bit, but it's quite a neat idea.
Paradoxes are one of things that are difficult to explain without using an example, and the classic example of one in time travel (which is sort of what this is) is going back and killing your own father/mother/grandparents/ancestor before they spawn the next generation. If you do this, then logically you never came into existence and hence you could not go back and kill your ancestor.
But as I say, if it's m-theory, then you're obviously not technically changing your own time line, you're popping back into the timeline of other dimensions. Indeed, the events "changed" in those alternate dimensions could be what originally happened or you could be creating those dimensions through the very act of your travel. It's the Back to the Future 2 alternate 1985 bit where everybody who isn't a physicist gets confused.
Anyway, the real point I was trying to make and then used up a lot of words talking about other interesting stuff was that it treads around in the waters of Quantum Leap. Quantum Leap was a science fiction show I really enjoyed as a kid where the main character hops around in time, leaping into the bodies of other people and then "fixing" or "altering" things in a positive way before he can move on. The paradoxes created in that show were never really explored, but Source Code plays with those ideas more.
It also repeatedly uses the same time slot, which makes things a bit like Groundhog Day as he 'remembers' what's going to happen.
I think you can probably tell from the above I rather enjoyed the film, because it let me think about this sort of stuff, but also, crucially it has at its core some really good character stuff. In a way it's more like a love story than it is a science fiction story, it just uses the sci-fi stuff in a clever way to help enhance that story too.
It's actually a short week for me as I'm off on holiday Friday (thank god) so I thought I'd post reviews today and tomorrow before wrapping the week up.
So a few weeks back I watched source code.
I actually quite enjoyed it, but I'll actually start at the end, if you see what I mean.
No, I don't either - what I mean is, I'll run through my thoughts as soon as the film ended. They went a bit like this:
"Well that was quite good. Bit of a paradoxical ending, but then the whole thing was a bit paradoxical. And if you go with m theory I guess it's not a paradox in a way.
"Actually, you know they could even make a sequel. Actually, I think it would make a better TV series. You could well imagine him popping into different people each episode and solving a different problem.
"Where have I heard that before? Wasn't that what happened in Quantum Leap? Hang on, the whole thing is really like Quantum Leap, isn't it?"
So I should explain a few things. The film doesn't quite join all the dots in terms of what's happening, but it seems to make use of m theory. M theory is one f those areas of physics that strays right into science fiction territory. It's basically the idea of multiple dimensions.
So in this film they're essentially using m-theory to repeatedly bounce into dimensions (or, potentially, they're creating them - as I say, it doesn't fully explain things) that are only fractionally different to ours and then find out the answer to a particular question. I won't go too much into the detail as it would spoiler things a bit, but it's quite a neat idea.
Paradoxes are one of things that are difficult to explain without using an example, and the classic example of one in time travel (which is sort of what this is) is going back and killing your own father/mother/grandparents/ancestor before they spawn the next generation. If you do this, then logically you never came into existence and hence you could not go back and kill your ancestor.
But as I say, if it's m-theory, then you're obviously not technically changing your own time line, you're popping back into the timeline of other dimensions. Indeed, the events "changed" in those alternate dimensions could be what originally happened or you could be creating those dimensions through the very act of your travel. It's the Back to the Future 2 alternate 1985 bit where everybody who isn't a physicist gets confused.
Anyway, the real point I was trying to make and then used up a lot of words talking about other interesting stuff was that it treads around in the waters of Quantum Leap. Quantum Leap was a science fiction show I really enjoyed as a kid where the main character hops around in time, leaping into the bodies of other people and then "fixing" or "altering" things in a positive way before he can move on. The paradoxes created in that show were never really explored, but Source Code plays with those ideas more.
It also repeatedly uses the same time slot, which makes things a bit like Groundhog Day as he 'remembers' what's going to happen.
I think you can probably tell from the above I rather enjoyed the film, because it let me think about this sort of stuff, but also, crucially it has at its core some really good character stuff. In a way it's more like a love story than it is a science fiction story, it just uses the sci-fi stuff in a clever way to help enhance that story too.
Monday, 24 October 2011
what a week it was
So last week I posted only two blog posts, because things were so manic at work I just wasn't getting the time to write blog posts.
I mean, I could theoretically have written them in the evening, but to be frank, I was so tired in the evenings I could do little other than watch a bit of telly and then go to bed.
So what was I so busy doing?
Well, I'd need to explain quite a bit about how my company works, but basically we were putting together a response to a particularly important framework. But what is a framework?
Well, the fundamental idea is that when somebody wants something done (a piece of work) they put out an Invitation to Tender (an ITT). That ITT sets out what they want doing and companies whose business it is to do that sort of work put together a response to that ITT. The people who put out the ITT then assess the bids they've received and pick the one that best meets the assessment criteria and offers best value for money.
That company therefore wins the work. You may have heard in the news about companies being awarded contracts and others not getting contracts they were expecting and having to cut jobs. Well that's the basic process.
However, you will appreciate that in some arenas there are lots of companies able to do the same sorts of things. You'll also appreciate that if you advertise things publicly potentially all of those companies will put in an ITT.
Also, when you put things out publicly you have to have all sorts of stuff in the assessment process that isn't hugely important, or is just the same as all the other pieces of work you want doing, but because it's a fully open competition you need to "tick the boxes".
So, to avoid that big process you can create an initial step where you compete a framework agreement. This framework can take various forms, but generally they have different "lots" (areas of work) and companies bid to get a place on that lot / framework. The idea is that you are effectively pre-assessing the companies in order to avoid the need to assess all the "boring stuff" every time and also to create a much smaller pool of suppliers.
The big advantage of this is that when each piece of work comes out it can be done in a lot less time and in a lot sleeker fashion.
And it was one of these frameworks that we were working on.
It's an absolute monster and covers a huge range of work that my company is involved in, so it took a huge amount of effort, so that's why I couldn't post.
I mean, I could theoretically have written them in the evening, but to be frank, I was so tired in the evenings I could do little other than watch a bit of telly and then go to bed.
So what was I so busy doing?
Well, I'd need to explain quite a bit about how my company works, but basically we were putting together a response to a particularly important framework. But what is a framework?
Well, the fundamental idea is that when somebody wants something done (a piece of work) they put out an Invitation to Tender (an ITT). That ITT sets out what they want doing and companies whose business it is to do that sort of work put together a response to that ITT. The people who put out the ITT then assess the bids they've received and pick the one that best meets the assessment criteria and offers best value for money.
That company therefore wins the work. You may have heard in the news about companies being awarded contracts and others not getting contracts they were expecting and having to cut jobs. Well that's the basic process.
However, you will appreciate that in some arenas there are lots of companies able to do the same sorts of things. You'll also appreciate that if you advertise things publicly potentially all of those companies will put in an ITT.
Also, when you put things out publicly you have to have all sorts of stuff in the assessment process that isn't hugely important, or is just the same as all the other pieces of work you want doing, but because it's a fully open competition you need to "tick the boxes".
So, to avoid that big process you can create an initial step where you compete a framework agreement. This framework can take various forms, but generally they have different "lots" (areas of work) and companies bid to get a place on that lot / framework. The idea is that you are effectively pre-assessing the companies in order to avoid the need to assess all the "boring stuff" every time and also to create a much smaller pool of suppliers.
The big advantage of this is that when each piece of work comes out it can be done in a lot less time and in a lot sleeker fashion.
And it was one of these frameworks that we were working on.
It's an absolute monster and covers a huge range of work that my company is involved in, so it took a huge amount of effort, so that's why I couldn't post.
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
korean gp
In this small chunk today I appear to have hit a slight lull in work.
I've basically managed to finish what I needed to do slightly early and it's taking slightly longer for someone else to finish what I will next have to work on. As such, I though I'd do a quick blog post so the blog isn't totally empty all week.
Well, I should definitely be able to post Friday and I hope Thursday we're finished, but you never know.
Anyway, last weekend it was the Korean Grand Prix, which I actually really enjoyed. I managed to make a more sensible fist of things that I did for the preceding weekend's Japanese Grand Prix, so I was a bit more alert, which may well have helped.
However, I think actually the combination of tyres, DRS, KERS and track layout worked quite well together. The layout seemed to have a good few places where overtaking would work normally and the addition of the tyres and sensible placing of DRS helped add further opportunities.
The highlight of the race was probably a huge battle between Mark Webber and Lewis Hamilton. Their cars clearly had different strengths and it lead to some really close racing. Also, of course, they're both really good drivers and up for a fight.
Lewis seemed very out of sorts when he wasn't in the car. In the car he seemed well up for it, pumping in some top qualifying times and really battling with Webber.
However, out of the car you wouldn't believe it was the same guy. He actually seemed like he might have been unwell, but I think it was more a reflection of some sort of unhappiness.
The weird thing, as I say, was that, in the car, he was fine. It therefore made the out of car stuff seem deliberate - as in, he wasn't unwell, but wanted to show he was unhappy. I dunno - it was all very odd.
So yeah, overall, I enjoyed the race and it seems that last year's wet race (it was wet all day Friday so that may have helped the racing as it meant there was no dry practice until Saturday morning, making it difficult to set the cars up - last year was the first year and it was wet, of course, and we have a different tyre supplier) might have robbed us of a great race.
Unfortunately, a lot of the stands seemed empty. I mean, it wasn't as bad as some of the new circuits we go to, but certainly some of the stands clearly had no-one in them.
I've basically managed to finish what I needed to do slightly early and it's taking slightly longer for someone else to finish what I will next have to work on. As such, I though I'd do a quick blog post so the blog isn't totally empty all week.
Well, I should definitely be able to post Friday and I hope Thursday we're finished, but you never know.
Anyway, last weekend it was the Korean Grand Prix, which I actually really enjoyed. I managed to make a more sensible fist of things that I did for the preceding weekend's Japanese Grand Prix, so I was a bit more alert, which may well have helped.
However, I think actually the combination of tyres, DRS, KERS and track layout worked quite well together. The layout seemed to have a good few places where overtaking would work normally and the addition of the tyres and sensible placing of DRS helped add further opportunities.
The highlight of the race was probably a huge battle between Mark Webber and Lewis Hamilton. Their cars clearly had different strengths and it lead to some really close racing. Also, of course, they're both really good drivers and up for a fight.
Lewis seemed very out of sorts when he wasn't in the car. In the car he seemed well up for it, pumping in some top qualifying times and really battling with Webber.
However, out of the car you wouldn't believe it was the same guy. He actually seemed like he might have been unwell, but I think it was more a reflection of some sort of unhappiness.
The weird thing, as I say, was that, in the car, he was fine. It therefore made the out of car stuff seem deliberate - as in, he wasn't unwell, but wanted to show he was unhappy. I dunno - it was all very odd.
So yeah, overall, I enjoyed the race and it seems that last year's wet race (it was wet all day Friday so that may have helped the racing as it meant there was no dry practice until Saturday morning, making it difficult to set the cars up - last year was the first year and it was wet, of course, and we have a different tyre supplier) might have robbed us of a great race.
Unfortunately, a lot of the stands seemed empty. I mean, it wasn't as bad as some of the new circuits we go to, but certainly some of the stands clearly had no-one in them.
Monday, 17 October 2011
work wins again
Unfortunately no blog post today as I've been incredibly busy at work just recently - so busy, in fact, that I've used up all the pre-written posts I put together and haven't had a chance to generate any more.
I've a fair few things to talk about, just not the time to write the posts.
I've a fair few things to talk about, just not the time to write the posts.
Friday, 14 October 2011
korean double header
It's the Korean Grand Prix this weekend.
As I mentioned last week I have absolutely no idea whether it's a good one or not. In fact, I don't actually have any memories of it at all.
Well, I say that. I'm pretty convinced it was only held for the first time last year and that it was the one where it was delayed because of the weather, Webber spun out because it was so wet and it ended up finishing as the sun was setting.
However, I would happily cop to having merged several races together or having gotten mixed up with another race. I certainly don't have Korea flagged in my memory banks as a classic.
One thing I will say is I don't think my scheduling plans are really going to survive contact with the enemy, which is to say that there are some things I going to have to do because 3 weeks is too long to leave them - for example, I'm going to run out of clothes if I don't do some washing.
However, I think I can do a sort of small version of most of these (just the one bag of essential washing) and then make up for it next week.
It's on at a similar sort of time to the Japanese Grand Prix, but I think I'll record it and watch it at my leisure. I was happy to get up for Japan (even though I screwed myself over), but I'm not sure I am for the Korean.
Otherwise I don't have many plans. I need to get some more bits on e-bay so that they'll finish in time for me sort them before my holiday. I also haven't done anything with the CDs I need to get rid of. I looked at a few of the "we buy CDs" sites, and, as expected, prices weren't great, but then they looked pretty crap on e-bay too.
As per usual, I'm a long way behind the curve on the medium transitions (CD to digital). In this case, I'm at a bit unsure I like the particular transition. I mean, you can't really sell MP3 files second hand at all, can you, irrespective of the other advantages they have.
As I mentioned last week I have absolutely no idea whether it's a good one or not. In fact, I don't actually have any memories of it at all.
Well, I say that. I'm pretty convinced it was only held for the first time last year and that it was the one where it was delayed because of the weather, Webber spun out because it was so wet and it ended up finishing as the sun was setting.
However, I would happily cop to having merged several races together or having gotten mixed up with another race. I certainly don't have Korea flagged in my memory banks as a classic.
One thing I will say is I don't think my scheduling plans are really going to survive contact with the enemy, which is to say that there are some things I going to have to do because 3 weeks is too long to leave them - for example, I'm going to run out of clothes if I don't do some washing.
However, I think I can do a sort of small version of most of these (just the one bag of essential washing) and then make up for it next week.
It's on at a similar sort of time to the Japanese Grand Prix, but I think I'll record it and watch it at my leisure. I was happy to get up for Japan (even though I screwed myself over), but I'm not sure I am for the Korean.
Otherwise I don't have many plans. I need to get some more bits on e-bay so that they'll finish in time for me sort them before my holiday. I also haven't done anything with the CDs I need to get rid of. I looked at a few of the "we buy CDs" sites, and, as expected, prices weren't great, but then they looked pretty crap on e-bay too.
As per usual, I'm a long way behind the curve on the medium transitions (CD to digital). In this case, I'm at a bit unsure I like the particular transition. I mean, you can't really sell MP3 files second hand at all, can you, irrespective of the other advantages they have.
Thursday, 13 October 2011
nose hair
I seem to have developed rather a lot of nose hair.
I've always had a fair bit of nose hair, but it used to be that you'd have to be really looking up my nose to see it. I mean, since puberty I've been very hairy, but in the last year or so my nose hair seems to have exploded out of my nose so that loads of hairs are poking out and are visible just from looking at me.
Now obviously I could leave these. I'm not a fan of how they look, so it wouldn't be a massive concern to me, but it's not really an option, because I find that as they get longer they tend to tickle against the edges of my nostrils and it's very itchy.
As such, there are a couple of options for there removal. Firstly I could pluck them. This obviously removes them right down to the root, but it's also absolute agony.
I'm no stranger to plucking as I actually pluck my brows. I know that probably comes across as a bit more concerned with my appearance than I'd be generally happy to admit to, but the thing is if I don't do it then I basically end up with one eyebrow.
And I don't just mean the bit between my eyebrows grows and connects, but the area between my brows and my hair line actually grows a thick layer of hairs too. Indeed, the hair even extends right down the side of my eyes, along that sort of crest area and connects up with my beard.
I sometimes wonder if I left it whether I wouldn't end up with a thick furry covering over my entire face. And that isn't a normal look, so I pluck. I generally do it at the same time as my haircut, as it sort of camouflages the change.
Anyway, plucking hairs is painful. Plucking nose hairs is excruciating. As such, I've been using a small set of scissors I've got to try to trim them back. It's an okay solution, but I seem to have to do it every other week, and it's also difficult to really get in there and trim the hairs properly, especially as I'm worried about nicking the inside of my nose.
I'm therefore thinking I'll ask for a nose hair trimmer for Chrimbo from my family. They have a really small bit on the end that's like a mini electric shaver. I can't actually use electric shavers on my beard as it's way too touch, but I think my nose hairs are more like eyebrow hairs than beard hair.
At least, I think there's such a thing as a nose hair trimmer. Unless I've dreamed it. If so maybe I could patent it and make a fortune?
I've always had a fair bit of nose hair, but it used to be that you'd have to be really looking up my nose to see it. I mean, since puberty I've been very hairy, but in the last year or so my nose hair seems to have exploded out of my nose so that loads of hairs are poking out and are visible just from looking at me.
Now obviously I could leave these. I'm not a fan of how they look, so it wouldn't be a massive concern to me, but it's not really an option, because I find that as they get longer they tend to tickle against the edges of my nostrils and it's very itchy.
As such, there are a couple of options for there removal. Firstly I could pluck them. This obviously removes them right down to the root, but it's also absolute agony.
I'm no stranger to plucking as I actually pluck my brows. I know that probably comes across as a bit more concerned with my appearance than I'd be generally happy to admit to, but the thing is if I don't do it then I basically end up with one eyebrow.
And I don't just mean the bit between my eyebrows grows and connects, but the area between my brows and my hair line actually grows a thick layer of hairs too. Indeed, the hair even extends right down the side of my eyes, along that sort of crest area and connects up with my beard.
I sometimes wonder if I left it whether I wouldn't end up with a thick furry covering over my entire face. And that isn't a normal look, so I pluck. I generally do it at the same time as my haircut, as it sort of camouflages the change.
Anyway, plucking hairs is painful. Plucking nose hairs is excruciating. As such, I've been using a small set of scissors I've got to try to trim them back. It's an okay solution, but I seem to have to do it every other week, and it's also difficult to really get in there and trim the hairs properly, especially as I'm worried about nicking the inside of my nose.
I'm therefore thinking I'll ask for a nose hair trimmer for Chrimbo from my family. They have a really small bit on the end that's like a mini electric shaver. I can't actually use electric shavers on my beard as it's way too touch, but I think my nose hairs are more like eyebrow hairs than beard hair.
At least, I think there's such a thing as a nose hair trimmer. Unless I've dreamed it. If so maybe I could patent it and make a fortune?
Wednesday, 12 October 2011
the core
the core is probably one of the biggest misfires I've seen in a long time.
It somehow manages to tread a fine line between believable science and science fiction... sorry, I should say, it manages to blunder around, stomping on the line between science and science fiction, making a general mess of everything.
The biggest crime it commits is the complete bogusness of the science it tramples over.
So the basic idea is that the magnetic field of the earth is somehow switching off. It's not clear why it only slowly slows down instead of properly switching off, or why it's happening at all, but we can chalk that up to bad science fiction.
No, the problematic elements is what seems to happen as a result. It's like someone has half remembered a bunch of stuff they've seen on the Discovery channel and turned it up to "11".
So pigeons are known to use the earth's magnetic field to navigate by. If it switches off they may therefore reasonably get confused. However, the film shows huge flocks of them all suicidally crashing into people, buildings, cars - anything and everything. But they only use magnetic fields for long range navigation - why would that cause them to fly into a building?
Or, somehow, we're supposed to be believe the magnetic field switching off would cause huge super-storms with vast amounts of lightening. Why isn't clear, but to demonstrate it, one hits Rome... and destroys everything. Including somehow managing to blow up the coliseum. You know, the big thing made out of non-conducting concrete, that, in this film, seems to act like a beacon for all the lightening ever.
And it also shows some people getting microwaved because the magnetic field protects us all against the earths microwaves. Except that the sun puts out very little microwave radiation, only a small part of it would be in the frequency needed to do stuff like boil water (you can almost see the monkey brains ticking over - "oh yeah, microwaves, they heat stuff, don't they?") and the microwaves are absorbed by the atmosphere, not deflected by the magnetic field.
What they're thinking of is the deflection of charged particles (the "solar wind") that the sun puts out.
And think abut it - if the sun was that harmful how could anyone have gone to the moon? (yes, yes, some idiots think we didn't, but then some people believe in fairies) And how would satellites and other spacecraft be able to function? Yes, if the magnetic field switched off it would not be great, but we're hardly talking the end of all life on earth within a year, as the film states.
The real problem is it also somehow manages to fail at having interesting characters, being instead stocked with paper-thin clichés and Hollywood tropes. I mean, we get almost no back-story to any of the characters and you're not really given any reason to care about them at all. However, they're all obviously brilliant. Even the guy who's broadly meant to be the 'Judas' in the group is actually a genius who comes up with a brilliant solution and sacrifices himself.
So even though you can sometimes compensate for pish science and rubbish science fiction with good and interesting characters, it can't even do that right.
and on top of all that, it was way too long. If it's a fun B-movie, like it seems to be trying to be, it shouldn't be rattling on for a chunk over two hours.
It somehow manages to tread a fine line between believable science and science fiction... sorry, I should say, it manages to blunder around, stomping on the line between science and science fiction, making a general mess of everything.
The biggest crime it commits is the complete bogusness of the science it tramples over.
So the basic idea is that the magnetic field of the earth is somehow switching off. It's not clear why it only slowly slows down instead of properly switching off, or why it's happening at all, but we can chalk that up to bad science fiction.
No, the problematic elements is what seems to happen as a result. It's like someone has half remembered a bunch of stuff they've seen on the Discovery channel and turned it up to "11".
So pigeons are known to use the earth's magnetic field to navigate by. If it switches off they may therefore reasonably get confused. However, the film shows huge flocks of them all suicidally crashing into people, buildings, cars - anything and everything. But they only use magnetic fields for long range navigation - why would that cause them to fly into a building?
Or, somehow, we're supposed to be believe the magnetic field switching off would cause huge super-storms with vast amounts of lightening. Why isn't clear, but to demonstrate it, one hits Rome... and destroys everything. Including somehow managing to blow up the coliseum. You know, the big thing made out of non-conducting concrete, that, in this film, seems to act like a beacon for all the lightening ever.
And it also shows some people getting microwaved because the magnetic field protects us all against the earths microwaves. Except that the sun puts out very little microwave radiation, only a small part of it would be in the frequency needed to do stuff like boil water (you can almost see the monkey brains ticking over - "oh yeah, microwaves, they heat stuff, don't they?") and the microwaves are absorbed by the atmosphere, not deflected by the magnetic field.
What they're thinking of is the deflection of charged particles (the "solar wind") that the sun puts out.
And think abut it - if the sun was that harmful how could anyone have gone to the moon? (yes, yes, some idiots think we didn't, but then some people believe in fairies) And how would satellites and other spacecraft be able to function? Yes, if the magnetic field switched off it would not be great, but we're hardly talking the end of all life on earth within a year, as the film states.
The real problem is it also somehow manages to fail at having interesting characters, being instead stocked with paper-thin clichés and Hollywood tropes. I mean, we get almost no back-story to any of the characters and you're not really given any reason to care about them at all. However, they're all obviously brilliant. Even the guy who's broadly meant to be the 'Judas' in the group is actually a genius who comes up with a brilliant solution and sacrifices himself.
So even though you can sometimes compensate for pish science and rubbish science fiction with good and interesting characters, it can't even do that right.
and on top of all that, it was way too long. If it's a fun B-movie, like it seems to be trying to be, it shouldn't be rattling on for a chunk over two hours.
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
tonsilloliths
When I was quite a lot younger I used to get tonsilloliths.
I didn’t know I used to get tonsilloliths, because I didn’t know what tonsilloliths were and I didn’t know they were a proper thing.
Basically, tonsilloliths are a sort of lumpy accretion that can build up in your tonsils. They don’t tend to be that deep and kinda poke out of the duct. Indeed, they can often ‘grow’ out of the tonsils an be visible in the back of the throat.
But what do I mean by a lumpy accretion?
I don’t know it you’re familiar with how pearls form in oysters, but I think it’s basically the same idea. A pearl forms when a lump of grit or other irritant gets into the oyster, and it slowly coats it until it becomes a large, roughly spherical lump. Yes, for those that didn’t know, pearls are basically solidified oyster spit.
In this case, the tonsilloliths form around little bits of food that get into your tonsils (which are like ducts at the back f your mouth / top of your throat - weirdly there doesn’t seem to be a clear explanation for what tonsils really do) and an accretion slowly builds up around them.
They’re not rock hard like pearls, but they are quite hard and they’re also very smelly. Indeed, they’re one of the causes of halitosis.
So I used to get these things, but never really knew what they were. They used to manifest for me in that, ever so often I’d get a feeling like they was something hard and course at the back of my mouth. In particular, I could feel it when I swallowed.
I’d end up basically rubbing my tongue against my pallet area (my tonsils, but I didn’t know it), scrapping the area with my finger like it itched and also trying to sort of blow the irritant away like a cat spitting up a hairball.
And as I say, I’d sort of spit up one of these hardish, very smelly, slightly yellow lumps that I recently discovered are called tonsilloliths.
I’ve not had one for years and, according to Wikipedia, they’re more common for teenagers, which is when I used to mainly get them. Also, and I’m not sure it's actually of any benefit, but after the disasters I had when I finally started going back to the dentists (after uni, when I hadn’t gone for years) I started doing everything, including using mouthwash, which I’d also gargle with.
As I say, I don’t know that it’s what prevents it, but I don’t really get them any more.
If you’re in the mood for a bit of grossness, you can look them up on you tube and see some really nasty sights of them being removed from he back of people’s mouths. Some of them on there are enormous, and I never got anything like that, but there the same basic beast.
I didn’t know I used to get tonsilloliths, because I didn’t know what tonsilloliths were and I didn’t know they were a proper thing.
Basically, tonsilloliths are a sort of lumpy accretion that can build up in your tonsils. They don’t tend to be that deep and kinda poke out of the duct. Indeed, they can often ‘grow’ out of the tonsils an be visible in the back of the throat.
But what do I mean by a lumpy accretion?
I don’t know it you’re familiar with how pearls form in oysters, but I think it’s basically the same idea. A pearl forms when a lump of grit or other irritant gets into the oyster, and it slowly coats it until it becomes a large, roughly spherical lump. Yes, for those that didn’t know, pearls are basically solidified oyster spit.
In this case, the tonsilloliths form around little bits of food that get into your tonsils (which are like ducts at the back f your mouth / top of your throat - weirdly there doesn’t seem to be a clear explanation for what tonsils really do) and an accretion slowly builds up around them.
They’re not rock hard like pearls, but they are quite hard and they’re also very smelly. Indeed, they’re one of the causes of halitosis.
So I used to get these things, but never really knew what they were. They used to manifest for me in that, ever so often I’d get a feeling like they was something hard and course at the back of my mouth. In particular, I could feel it when I swallowed.
I’d end up basically rubbing my tongue against my pallet area (my tonsils, but I didn’t know it), scrapping the area with my finger like it itched and also trying to sort of blow the irritant away like a cat spitting up a hairball.
And as I say, I’d sort of spit up one of these hardish, very smelly, slightly yellow lumps that I recently discovered are called tonsilloliths.
I’ve not had one for years and, according to Wikipedia, they’re more common for teenagers, which is when I used to mainly get them. Also, and I’m not sure it's actually of any benefit, but after the disasters I had when I finally started going back to the dentists (after uni, when I hadn’t gone for years) I started doing everything, including using mouthwash, which I’d also gargle with.
As I say, I don’t know that it’s what prevents it, but I don’t really get them any more.
If you’re in the mood for a bit of grossness, you can look them up on you tube and see some really nasty sights of them being removed from he back of people’s mouths. Some of them on there are enormous, and I never got anything like that, but there the same basic beast.
Monday, 10 October 2011
japanometric
I have no idea what I mean by that as a title.
But then to be honest, I'm struggling to know quite what I mean by anything today, as I got no sleep on Saturday night.
Well, I've a sneaking suspicion I got about an hour at 4:30AM. But certainly from 11:00PM on Saturday night I was doing stuff right through until about 4:00AM on Sunday morning.
I don't really know why I didn't get any sleep. I actually went to bed early on Saturday, but I laid there for so long totally wide awake that it was apparent that the whole effort was pretty much wasted. I think a big part of the problem was that I'd basically done nothing all Saturday. I mean, I'd been busy all day, but what I was doing was fiddly and mentally taxing, rather than physically taxing.
I'd also been eating badly (I gained a pound on Sunday's weigh in, though it wasn't a proper like-for-like consistent weigh in) all day, so I think I'd managed to kind of build up a chunk of energy that meant when I tried to go to bed, I just wasn't tired at all.
And I didn't get tired until very early in the morning, which then left me with a bit of a dilemma, because the Japanese Grand Prix was on. Now I have to confess I'd obviously gotten the wrong end of the stick the when it was on, as I thought it started at about 4:00AM. However, the actual race didn't start until 7:00AM, with an hours build up before hand.
If I'd known it didn't start until then I'd probably have tried to get a few hours sleep, but instead I was waiting for it to start and perhaps drifted off for a bit.
This tiredness did hamper my enjoyment of the race. Indeed, it hampered all of my day, if I'm honest. The race looked like quite a good one, but I kept loosing focus and being distracted, due to my tiredness.
I didn't make the same mistake on Sunday, as I did loads of stuff that included washing my car and going for a one and a half hour walk. I was truly shattered by the afternoon, which was great, but left me with another dilemma.
This time, the problem was going to bed too early. This would potentially allow me to catch up on lost sleep, but there was also the potential problem of waking up very early in the morning and therefore mess up my body clock, setting it to that I keep waking up early in the morning.
In the end I stayed up until about 8:30PM, but this morning I was shattered when I got up. I'll therefore try to go to bed a bit early tonight as well, although I'm doubting I'll manage that.
But then to be honest, I'm struggling to know quite what I mean by anything today, as I got no sleep on Saturday night.
Well, I've a sneaking suspicion I got about an hour at 4:30AM. But certainly from 11:00PM on Saturday night I was doing stuff right through until about 4:00AM on Sunday morning.
I don't really know why I didn't get any sleep. I actually went to bed early on Saturday, but I laid there for so long totally wide awake that it was apparent that the whole effort was pretty much wasted. I think a big part of the problem was that I'd basically done nothing all Saturday. I mean, I'd been busy all day, but what I was doing was fiddly and mentally taxing, rather than physically taxing.
I'd also been eating badly (I gained a pound on Sunday's weigh in, though it wasn't a proper like-for-like consistent weigh in) all day, so I think I'd managed to kind of build up a chunk of energy that meant when I tried to go to bed, I just wasn't tired at all.
And I didn't get tired until very early in the morning, which then left me with a bit of a dilemma, because the Japanese Grand Prix was on. Now I have to confess I'd obviously gotten the wrong end of the stick the when it was on, as I thought it started at about 4:00AM. However, the actual race didn't start until 7:00AM, with an hours build up before hand.
If I'd known it didn't start until then I'd probably have tried to get a few hours sleep, but instead I was waiting for it to start and perhaps drifted off for a bit.
This tiredness did hamper my enjoyment of the race. Indeed, it hampered all of my day, if I'm honest. The race looked like quite a good one, but I kept loosing focus and being distracted, due to my tiredness.
I didn't make the same mistake on Sunday, as I did loads of stuff that included washing my car and going for a one and a half hour walk. I was truly shattered by the afternoon, which was great, but left me with another dilemma.
This time, the problem was going to bed too early. This would potentially allow me to catch up on lost sleep, but there was also the potential problem of waking up very early in the morning and therefore mess up my body clock, setting it to that I keep waking up early in the morning.
In the end I stayed up until about 8:30PM, but this morning I was shattered when I got up. I'll therefore try to go to bed a bit early tonight as well, although I'm doubting I'll manage that.
Friday, 7 October 2011
suzuka here we come
So this weekend it's the Japanese Grand Prix from the famous Suzuka track.
Suzuka is one of the classic tracks, like Spa and Silverstone, and it usually produces some good races. There are a couple of spots that have always been good for overtaking and hopefully the new rules will mean it's another cracker. I'm certainly looking forward to it.
Unlike Singapore, the Japanese race is held at normal local time, which means it will be on very early in the morning here in the UK. I'm currently unsure if I will get up to watch it live, but I've set it to be recorded to give me the option.
The race will also put my whole new scheduling system to test, because the weekend after is the Korean Grand Prix. The real issue is that my schedule depends on me doing my washing on Saturday morning and then cleaning my bedsit and doing all sorts of other stuff on non-GP weekends.
However, I only have enough clothes and stuff to last me two weeks without washing. What I may do is do a smaller wash on the weekend that is the Korean GP, just to tide me over until the following weekend when I'll then do the usual cleaning schedule.
An advantage I'll have is that the Korean GP will also be shown very early, so again, it would be one I'd record anyway. I can't honestly remember whether the Korean GP is any good (in fact, I can't actually remember it at all - it is new? I know India's new this year, but I thought it was only new one, so maybe Korean was new last year?), so I don't think I'll be too worried about watching it live.
Watching the GP live is often quite important, because it's a classic one for sports announcers to spoiler. They always warn you if you don't want to hear football results, but they never do with F1 and the opening line describing it will be "Sebastian Vettel has one the Singapore Grand Prix..." which gives you no chance to avoid it.
Anyway, it will be a particularly important test, because next year there seem to be quite a few back-to-back races, so it'll be good to see if what I'll need to do.
Suzuka is one of the classic tracks, like Spa and Silverstone, and it usually produces some good races. There are a couple of spots that have always been good for overtaking and hopefully the new rules will mean it's another cracker. I'm certainly looking forward to it.
Unlike Singapore, the Japanese race is held at normal local time, which means it will be on very early in the morning here in the UK. I'm currently unsure if I will get up to watch it live, but I've set it to be recorded to give me the option.
The race will also put my whole new scheduling system to test, because the weekend after is the Korean Grand Prix. The real issue is that my schedule depends on me doing my washing on Saturday morning and then cleaning my bedsit and doing all sorts of other stuff on non-GP weekends.
However, I only have enough clothes and stuff to last me two weeks without washing. What I may do is do a smaller wash on the weekend that is the Korean GP, just to tide me over until the following weekend when I'll then do the usual cleaning schedule.
An advantage I'll have is that the Korean GP will also be shown very early, so again, it would be one I'd record anyway. I can't honestly remember whether the Korean GP is any good (in fact, I can't actually remember it at all - it is new? I know India's new this year, but I thought it was only new one, so maybe Korean was new last year?), so I don't think I'll be too worried about watching it live.
Watching the GP live is often quite important, because it's a classic one for sports announcers to spoiler. They always warn you if you don't want to hear football results, but they never do with F1 and the opening line describing it will be "Sebastian Vettel has one the Singapore Grand Prix..." which gives you no chance to avoid it.
Anyway, it will be a particularly important test, because next year there seem to be quite a few back-to-back races, so it'll be good to see if what I'll need to do.
Thursday, 6 October 2011
some tv musings
I thought today I'd try to do some musing on telly stuff, as it's been a while since I've done that.
I finished the most recent series of Torchwood. It was quite good, but it wasn't as dark as the Children one. I liked it, but it did end with quite a lot of questions unanswered.
Now some of those were good in that I think they were intended to set up future series, but the main thing, which was the rift, wasn't explained at all. I mean, what was it, were did it come from, how did it work, why was it there? None of that was really answered.
There was all sorts of odd stuff that didn't work either. It's like it showed stuff falling into the hole, but it wasn't clear where that stuff was coming from, or, more importantly, why gravity seemed to be operating sideways. Rather than the hole being below them ,it was in front of them, yet it was meant to go through the earth.
And if stuff was falling in both ways, where was it all going? And if you assume geological activity and shifting continents, how does that work? I dunno, it all felt a bit unsatisfactory.
My trumpeting of the return of Total Wipeout seems to have been quite premature. The two celeb specials, which were clearly made as if they would appear at the end of the series (there was no explanation of some of the obstacles, like you'd get if they were the first episodes) were shown and then there's been nothing else.
I was hoping it might appear now that we're in to October, but I can't see it in the TV listings. The new series of QI is on, and they usually start at about the same time. Though saying that the BBC seems to have moved away from hard seasons and tends to take a more staggered approach to starting series nowadays.
A couple of new BBC series have caught my eye.
There's the new Planet Dinosaur, which is, well, not a sequel to Walking with Dinosaurs, but of a similar vein. However, this series is more focused on the actual evidence. My memory of walking is that it purely showed reconstructions, but in Planet they'll show a bit of reconstruction and then break away to show you what the actual evidence is.
This is good in that the evidence is fascinating, but it can break up the reconstruction bits quite badly. I think, actually, each programme should have been a little bit longer - perhaps 50 minutes instead of 30 - so they could be a bit more thorough.
Another new show is "The Fades". This is on BBC3, which is the BBC's "yoof" channel and I was afraid it would therefore be crap, but actually I've been rather enjoying it. The central ideas are a little mashed together, but it's quite well written and there are some interesting characters. Certainly given how poor I found the third series of Being Human to be (not sure I ever mentioned that - it seemed to forget it should be funny every so often and instead was even more angsty) this seems like a good replacement.
The Gadget Show has returned to its Monday slot. They also seem to have dropped the annoying new competition format. These are both good things.
The latest series of Bang Goes the Theory has just finished this week. I continue to be impressed by the show - it's populist enough to keep it generally engaging, but with enough proper science bits in there to also be interesting. And it's good to see the return of a show like this since Tomorrow's World died all those years ago.
There have been a lot of interesting shows on recently about the Army. The BBC is running one of its themed seasons and there have been other random shows. These have been of varying interest and quality. One that really struck me, though, was around the guys who dispose of Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). It was fascinating, harrowing and, to be frank, terrifying in equal measures.
That's really only a small sample, as there's quite a lot on just recently that I've been enjoying.
I finished the most recent series of Torchwood. It was quite good, but it wasn't as dark as the Children one. I liked it, but it did end with quite a lot of questions unanswered.
Now some of those were good in that I think they were intended to set up future series, but the main thing, which was the rift, wasn't explained at all. I mean, what was it, were did it come from, how did it work, why was it there? None of that was really answered.
There was all sorts of odd stuff that didn't work either. It's like it showed stuff falling into the hole, but it wasn't clear where that stuff was coming from, or, more importantly, why gravity seemed to be operating sideways. Rather than the hole being below them ,it was in front of them, yet it was meant to go through the earth.
And if stuff was falling in both ways, where was it all going? And if you assume geological activity and shifting continents, how does that work? I dunno, it all felt a bit unsatisfactory.
My trumpeting of the return of Total Wipeout seems to have been quite premature. The two celeb specials, which were clearly made as if they would appear at the end of the series (there was no explanation of some of the obstacles, like you'd get if they were the first episodes) were shown and then there's been nothing else.
I was hoping it might appear now that we're in to October, but I can't see it in the TV listings. The new series of QI is on, and they usually start at about the same time. Though saying that the BBC seems to have moved away from hard seasons and tends to take a more staggered approach to starting series nowadays.
A couple of new BBC series have caught my eye.
There's the new Planet Dinosaur, which is, well, not a sequel to Walking with Dinosaurs, but of a similar vein. However, this series is more focused on the actual evidence. My memory of walking is that it purely showed reconstructions, but in Planet they'll show a bit of reconstruction and then break away to show you what the actual evidence is.
This is good in that the evidence is fascinating, but it can break up the reconstruction bits quite badly. I think, actually, each programme should have been a little bit longer - perhaps 50 minutes instead of 30 - so they could be a bit more thorough.
Another new show is "The Fades". This is on BBC3, which is the BBC's "yoof" channel and I was afraid it would therefore be crap, but actually I've been rather enjoying it. The central ideas are a little mashed together, but it's quite well written and there are some interesting characters. Certainly given how poor I found the third series of Being Human to be (not sure I ever mentioned that - it seemed to forget it should be funny every so often and instead was even more angsty) this seems like a good replacement.
The Gadget Show has returned to its Monday slot. They also seem to have dropped the annoying new competition format. These are both good things.
The latest series of Bang Goes the Theory has just finished this week. I continue to be impressed by the show - it's populist enough to keep it generally engaging, but with enough proper science bits in there to also be interesting. And it's good to see the return of a show like this since Tomorrow's World died all those years ago.
There have been a lot of interesting shows on recently about the Army. The BBC is running one of its themed seasons and there have been other random shows. These have been of varying interest and quality. One that really struck me, though, was around the guys who dispose of Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). It was fascinating, harrowing and, to be frank, terrifying in equal measures.
That's really only a small sample, as there's quite a lot on just recently that I've been enjoying.
Wednesday, 5 October 2011
the talented mr ripley
There's quite a clever trick in the Talented Mr Ripley where you are essentially made to empathise with a killer.
Well, I say empathise. It's more like you feel on his side. Well, ish. It's more like you feel a conflict as to whether he should get away with it or be caught. However, that's more in the beginning. Towards the end it's more difficult to feel the same as he does more and more wrong stuff.
Let me explain - the issue is that Tom Ripley is a poor kid who lives in a crappy apartment and does crappy jobs. However, through chance and the judicious application of a bit of fibbing, he finds himself thrust into the world of high society.
And we're talking about the 1950s, so poor was really poor and the high life must have seem like a completely different world. He also ends up in Italy, which just adds another sheen of coolness.
So okay he fibbed, but he's poor so you sort of feel it's okay. He then basically latches on to a guy who is very wealthy and privileged and, to be frank, is rather unpleasant. So although you feel Tom is scrounging, the guy he's scrounging off - Dickie Greenleaf - kinda deserves it.
However, eventually it all turns and to avoid spoilers I won't tell you the exact details of how it turns, but the point is you kinda realise that Ripley isn't really very... balanced. I mean, I wouldn't say he's mad, just that he's a sandwich short of a full picnic.
There's also a bit of an undercurrent of homosexuality, which would have been a serious taboo back in the 50s. So was that a contributing factor (I don't mean in a gays are evil but as in it would have been a difficult thing to deal with and he clearly falls in love with Dickie).
What I'm really trying to get at here is that these are complicated characters who feel very real. Although the circumstances are extreme, you kinda feel like it could all hang together.
Something I particularly liked was that the whole film is told through Tom's viewpoint, but eventually you come to realise that there have been things happening in parallel that almost represent another film. There's a point towards the end in particular where there's a flip in what you perceive to be happening that clearly says "well those other guys have been doing other stuff and where Tom (and therefore we) thought it was going to be a problem, now it's his salvation".
It's very clever, which is how I'd sum up the film - it's intelligent. It also looks beautiful and there are some excellent performances.
My only criticism is that it's a bit long. It is a complicated story and so brevity probably wouldn't have helped it, but there are some sections towards the beginning where it perhaps labours the point a bit heavily. Also, a couple of things don't quite pay off in as full a way as I'd thought they might, but it's not like it makes it a bad film, just more old school - there's a big build up and a lot of development before it really gets to the "thriller" side of things.
Well, I say empathise. It's more like you feel on his side. Well, ish. It's more like you feel a conflict as to whether he should get away with it or be caught. However, that's more in the beginning. Towards the end it's more difficult to feel the same as he does more and more wrong stuff.
Let me explain - the issue is that Tom Ripley is a poor kid who lives in a crappy apartment and does crappy jobs. However, through chance and the judicious application of a bit of fibbing, he finds himself thrust into the world of high society.
And we're talking about the 1950s, so poor was really poor and the high life must have seem like a completely different world. He also ends up in Italy, which just adds another sheen of coolness.
So okay he fibbed, but he's poor so you sort of feel it's okay. He then basically latches on to a guy who is very wealthy and privileged and, to be frank, is rather unpleasant. So although you feel Tom is scrounging, the guy he's scrounging off - Dickie Greenleaf - kinda deserves it.
However, eventually it all turns and to avoid spoilers I won't tell you the exact details of how it turns, but the point is you kinda realise that Ripley isn't really very... balanced. I mean, I wouldn't say he's mad, just that he's a sandwich short of a full picnic.
There's also a bit of an undercurrent of homosexuality, which would have been a serious taboo back in the 50s. So was that a contributing factor (I don't mean in a gays are evil but as in it would have been a difficult thing to deal with and he clearly falls in love with Dickie).
What I'm really trying to get at here is that these are complicated characters who feel very real. Although the circumstances are extreme, you kinda feel like it could all hang together.
Something I particularly liked was that the whole film is told through Tom's viewpoint, but eventually you come to realise that there have been things happening in parallel that almost represent another film. There's a point towards the end in particular where there's a flip in what you perceive to be happening that clearly says "well those other guys have been doing other stuff and where Tom (and therefore we) thought it was going to be a problem, now it's his salvation".
It's very clever, which is how I'd sum up the film - it's intelligent. It also looks beautiful and there are some excellent performances.
My only criticism is that it's a bit long. It is a complicated story and so brevity probably wouldn't have helped it, but there are some sections towards the beginning where it perhaps labours the point a bit heavily. Also, a couple of things don't quite pay off in as full a way as I'd thought they might, but it's not like it makes it a bad film, just more old school - there's a big build up and a lot of development before it really gets to the "thriller" side of things.
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
google+ and chrome
I gave google chrome a go the other week.
It has some nice touches. The integration with other google features is quite nice, the back-end interface is quite nice and it seems quite quick. I also got it because recent versions of Firefox seems to have some real memory leakage problems.
When I use Firefox to view crunchyroll or even do stuff on animepaper like download a bunch of scans, it doesn't seem to release the memory properly, so I keep having to restart it, which is crap.
chrome doesn't do that and also seems a little quicker than Firefox. Trouble is, it doesn't seem to have some of the things I like in Firefox - separate download window, more traditional "file" type menus - but also, it's not very customisable. So, for example, it has a bookmarks toolbar, which is basically fixed in its location, which is below the tabs and address bar, which I find annoying. But, more importantly, you can't move things around (that I can find).
Also, Ezy sent me an invite to google+, which is Google's social network thing.
I've given it a go and registered, but I have to say I really struggle with most of the social networking sites. I have facebook, myspace and twitter accounts and they're basically all totally neglected. I mean, I have enough trouble trying to blog every day, maintaining something like a social network page is just way too much like effort.
Part of the idea of google plus is that it's integrated with all the other google things you use. Now, while I like that for chrome, it actually has big disadvantages for me on something like google+.
See, a lot of the people I know have different relationships with me. So, the people I work with don't know about my interest in anime and manga. Certain circles of friend know I have an interest in it but don't know what it is or have any interest in it themselves. Other friends that's essentially how I know them - through that interest.
Now that's okay, but the problem is I keep some of those groups separate for very good reasons. While I do object to anime and manga all being classified as "cartoon porn", I'm not going to pretend it doesn't exist or that I don't enjoy such things.
And of course a lot of stuff is borderline. I'll give you some specific examples - I used to make wallpapers, a fair few of which were ecchii to varying degrees. Recently, I closed my wallpaper website down (hopefully temporarily) and moved all the images to a blog site.
That blog site was a google one and I used Google's Picasa site to host the images.
All well and good, but of course with google+'s integration, it turns out it shows all those Picasa galleries in your "my pictures" bit. So, in other words, if I was to friend (they use circles and I didn't investigate it fully) someone at work, could look in my gallery and see all the anime stuff? A good chunk of it is nearly pornographic so that would not be a good thing.
I wouldn't be surprised if you could set it up so they couldn't, but as I say, far too much like effort.
So I set all the galleries to "view only if you have the link" - but what does that actually mean? Could they do a couple of clicks and get access to them or what?
Also, what about people I'd want to see the images? Are they now blocked unless they're coming in via the blog that has them on? But I'd actually be happy for them to just brows through them on google+.
And that's just a specific example for me. Many people have flagged the whole thing google does that you have to use your real name and can't use an alias.
All these whole social networking things all just seems to open up more cans of problematic worms to me than I've got the time, effort or interest to really deal with.
But there's also something I heard recently that makes them all a bit scarier. Basically, facebook are introducing a new version / tool that, in essence, operates on the assumption that everything you do you want to share with the world. It's also facebook's vision that they will essentially become people's "portal to the internet".
Man, that sounds risky - imagine installing it with good intentions, or not understanding what it was going o do and then it broadcasts to the world all the stuff you'd rather that big chunks of the world did not know. And imagine that teamed with them acting as the portal through which you do all your web stuff.
That would open up the possibility so many potentially bad things it makes the mind boggle.
It has some nice touches. The integration with other google features is quite nice, the back-end interface is quite nice and it seems quite quick. I also got it because recent versions of Firefox seems to have some real memory leakage problems.
When I use Firefox to view crunchyroll or even do stuff on animepaper like download a bunch of scans, it doesn't seem to release the memory properly, so I keep having to restart it, which is crap.
chrome doesn't do that and also seems a little quicker than Firefox. Trouble is, it doesn't seem to have some of the things I like in Firefox - separate download window, more traditional "file" type menus - but also, it's not very customisable. So, for example, it has a bookmarks toolbar, which is basically fixed in its location, which is below the tabs and address bar, which I find annoying. But, more importantly, you can't move things around (that I can find).
Also, Ezy sent me an invite to google+, which is Google's social network thing.
I've given it a go and registered, but I have to say I really struggle with most of the social networking sites. I have facebook, myspace and twitter accounts and they're basically all totally neglected. I mean, I have enough trouble trying to blog every day, maintaining something like a social network page is just way too much like effort.
Part of the idea of google plus is that it's integrated with all the other google things you use. Now, while I like that for chrome, it actually has big disadvantages for me on something like google+.
See, a lot of the people I know have different relationships with me. So, the people I work with don't know about my interest in anime and manga. Certain circles of friend know I have an interest in it but don't know what it is or have any interest in it themselves. Other friends that's essentially how I know them - through that interest.
Now that's okay, but the problem is I keep some of those groups separate for very good reasons. While I do object to anime and manga all being classified as "cartoon porn", I'm not going to pretend it doesn't exist or that I don't enjoy such things.
And of course a lot of stuff is borderline. I'll give you some specific examples - I used to make wallpapers, a fair few of which were ecchii to varying degrees. Recently, I closed my wallpaper website down (hopefully temporarily) and moved all the images to a blog site.
That blog site was a google one and I used Google's Picasa site to host the images.
All well and good, but of course with google+'s integration, it turns out it shows all those Picasa galleries in your "my pictures" bit. So, in other words, if I was to friend (they use circles and I didn't investigate it fully) someone at work, could look in my gallery and see all the anime stuff? A good chunk of it is nearly pornographic so that would not be a good thing.
I wouldn't be surprised if you could set it up so they couldn't, but as I say, far too much like effort.
So I set all the galleries to "view only if you have the link" - but what does that actually mean? Could they do a couple of clicks and get access to them or what?
Also, what about people I'd want to see the images? Are they now blocked unless they're coming in via the blog that has them on? But I'd actually be happy for them to just brows through them on google+.
And that's just a specific example for me. Many people have flagged the whole thing google does that you have to use your real name and can't use an alias.
All these whole social networking things all just seems to open up more cans of problematic worms to me than I've got the time, effort or interest to really deal with.
But there's also something I heard recently that makes them all a bit scarier. Basically, facebook are introducing a new version / tool that, in essence, operates on the assumption that everything you do you want to share with the world. It's also facebook's vision that they will essentially become people's "portal to the internet".
Man, that sounds risky - imagine installing it with good intentions, or not understanding what it was going o do and then it broadcasts to the world all the stuff you'd rather that big chunks of the world did not know. And imagine that teamed with them acting as the portal through which you do all your web stuff.
That would open up the possibility so many potentially bad things it makes the mind boggle.
Monday, 3 October 2011
cash strapped
I've been having some serious financial issues just recently.
There are a number of causes.
The primary one is my spend-thrift ways (you don't acquire hundreds of unwatched DVDs and unread books without spending a hell of a lot of money), but extra pressure has recently been building due to the rise in the cost of living.
In particular, Petrol now costs an absolute fortune. I easily spend more than £100 a month, which is getting on for half as much again as I spent four years ago and in that time I've not had any pay increases.
But also, this last month I tried to "pre-invest" in electricity and spent a total of £150 to try to build up a bit of a cushion. Now that's a lot of money, but I felt it was necessary because my electricity supplier has increased their rates by 11%. This is particularly worrisome as I've heard serious predictions that this winter is going to be another super cold one.
Apparently we're going to have this warm spell, and then temperatures are going to plummet. I hope they don't plummet too far before I go on holiday. I'm going down to Devon at the end of October, which is a bit later than I would usually do, but I felt I needed to fit in with other people's holidays a bit. It's also already booked, so I can't change it.
My landlord is apparently going to plumb some heating in across from his place while I'm holiday, which will hopefully help a bit with heating (it's the electricity for heating that really hits me during the winter) although it's going to mean my rent will go up a fiver. Also I won't have any control over it, so it'll only be on at certain times and of course during summer I won't use it, so although it might only sound like £5 a month for heating, it's probably more like £10 a month during winter. So helpful, but I'm still going to be spending a fair old bit on heating.
I've also had to buy some more clothes. When I switched over the summer cloths I actually chucked a few clothes away. This was partly because they were getting very worn out, but also because I'd lost a lot of weight.
Back then of course I thought I'd loose more over summer, but I haven't so I'm still having to buy outsize clothes, which are more expensive. I'm not sure why they're more expensive - aren't all clothes made in sweatshops in Malaysia? I mean, I know there's more cloth in big clothes, but surely cloth costs next to nothing and there's not that much more labour involved, surely?
Anyway, point is I've had to buy a new coat, a suit, some new belts and I've also bought a new work shirt. As mentioned, I threw some clothes away and I actually threw too many shirts away, so I have to get some shirts or I'll be wearing short sleeve shirts right into winter!
I only got one shirt, more as an experiment than anything else, as I measured my collar size and, to be frank, I couldn't actually believe the size, which was 16 inches. I've a feeling that the shirt I've therefore ordered will fit my neck, but probably not my waist!
Also, I've had a review of my pension and it's gone up as a result. I'm in a bit of a weird position with my pension in that I started it way "ahead of the game" but then I failed to really capitalise on that and increase it in line with my wage. Now, the flip side to that is that there was a miss communication when I set it up and my contribution was nearly double what it should have been, but still, now that I'm on a lot more I should be contributing more so that I'll have a good pension when I retire.
Which, if you think about it, is really just another reflection of how bad I am with organising my finances.
I therefore got a bunch of stuff on e-bay this last weekend, and also identified some other stuff I could put on next weekend. But the truth is I'm running out of old stuff I could e-bay and really need to go through things I've got on my to do piles in order to sell them.
There are a number of causes.
The primary one is my spend-thrift ways (you don't acquire hundreds of unwatched DVDs and unread books without spending a hell of a lot of money), but extra pressure has recently been building due to the rise in the cost of living.
In particular, Petrol now costs an absolute fortune. I easily spend more than £100 a month, which is getting on for half as much again as I spent four years ago and in that time I've not had any pay increases.
But also, this last month I tried to "pre-invest" in electricity and spent a total of £150 to try to build up a bit of a cushion. Now that's a lot of money, but I felt it was necessary because my electricity supplier has increased their rates by 11%. This is particularly worrisome as I've heard serious predictions that this winter is going to be another super cold one.
Apparently we're going to have this warm spell, and then temperatures are going to plummet. I hope they don't plummet too far before I go on holiday. I'm going down to Devon at the end of October, which is a bit later than I would usually do, but I felt I needed to fit in with other people's holidays a bit. It's also already booked, so I can't change it.
My landlord is apparently going to plumb some heating in across from his place while I'm holiday, which will hopefully help a bit with heating (it's the electricity for heating that really hits me during the winter) although it's going to mean my rent will go up a fiver. Also I won't have any control over it, so it'll only be on at certain times and of course during summer I won't use it, so although it might only sound like £5 a month for heating, it's probably more like £10 a month during winter. So helpful, but I'm still going to be spending a fair old bit on heating.
I've also had to buy some more clothes. When I switched over the summer cloths I actually chucked a few clothes away. This was partly because they were getting very worn out, but also because I'd lost a lot of weight.
Back then of course I thought I'd loose more over summer, but I haven't so I'm still having to buy outsize clothes, which are more expensive. I'm not sure why they're more expensive - aren't all clothes made in sweatshops in Malaysia? I mean, I know there's more cloth in big clothes, but surely cloth costs next to nothing and there's not that much more labour involved, surely?
Anyway, point is I've had to buy a new coat, a suit, some new belts and I've also bought a new work shirt. As mentioned, I threw some clothes away and I actually threw too many shirts away, so I have to get some shirts or I'll be wearing short sleeve shirts right into winter!
I only got one shirt, more as an experiment than anything else, as I measured my collar size and, to be frank, I couldn't actually believe the size, which was 16 inches. I've a feeling that the shirt I've therefore ordered will fit my neck, but probably not my waist!
Also, I've had a review of my pension and it's gone up as a result. I'm in a bit of a weird position with my pension in that I started it way "ahead of the game" but then I failed to really capitalise on that and increase it in line with my wage. Now, the flip side to that is that there was a miss communication when I set it up and my contribution was nearly double what it should have been, but still, now that I'm on a lot more I should be contributing more so that I'll have a good pension when I retire.
Which, if you think about it, is really just another reflection of how bad I am with organising my finances.
I therefore got a bunch of stuff on e-bay this last weekend, and also identified some other stuff I could put on next weekend. But the truth is I'm running out of old stuff I could e-bay and really need to go through things I've got on my to do piles in order to sell them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)