I'd obviously put together one of my famous to do lists for my holiday.
One of the main things I wanted to do was watch some of the fansubs I have failed to keep up with. I did watch a few things, although not as much as I'd hoped. However, I was sensible to watch things that haven't been licensed since they take up more room (for licensed stuff I generally only download a couple of episodes to sample them).
I also watched Nausicaa and Howl's Moving Castle on DVD. I've had them for ages but have failed to find time to watch them. I liked both, but they won't be going into my permanent collection - for Nausicaa I think he's done the same basic themes better elsewhere (Mononoke in particular) and Howl's was enjoyable, but lacked depth.
One of the things I wanted to try was my new portable Blu-Ray drive. This is an external type drive for a computer, rather than a stand-alone portable player. Weirdly it has a thing that says you can essentially run Blu-rays directly into TVs from it via USB, but then contradictorily it requires two USB sockets when you plug it in to a computer in order to power it, so how can it run okay on a TV when you only plug it into one USB slot?
Also, it moaned horribly about my laptop's graphics card not providing hardware acceleration (fair enough, it is an old laptop) so how can a TV run Blu-Ray disks direct?
Anyway, my laptop wasn't really man enough for the job of playing Blu-Rays. The drive came with Power DVD, which basically refused to play the disks at all without the hardware acceleration and even when using the other player (the open source Korean one - I forget the name) the playback was horribly jittery. However, the other thing this drive gives me, which in some ways is more important, is the ability to play DVDs multi-region.
Well, the drive itself doesn't, but AnyDVD is able to get around the region coding issue. I discovered last time I took a holiday with the intent of watching some anime (the vast majority of my collection being Region 1) that my laptop's internal DVD drive is essentially built in such a way that it can't be gotten around - once you use up your allowed number of changes, that's it.
The other thing I wanted to do was catch up on reading - I've ended up with a lot of manga that I wanted to read. I'd also managed to accumulate several magazines, all of which I finished. I also read World War Z, which I got on the kindle. It's really very good - even if you don't like zombies it's done in such a way that the fact it's zombies is mostly sort of incidental. It's difficult to explain, but I can see why it's been such a hit. Quite how they'll make a film of it and make it exciting I'm not sure, though.
I say I read them all - I read all that I took, which is the majority, but I've some more manga at home I need to read. Most of this is actually in hardback or very large size format, which is why it was difficult to take with me.
Being a manifestation of the transperambulation of pseudo-cosmic antimatter of legend.
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
Monday, 1 October 2012
rather damp
I'm back off of holiday.
And I have a bit of a case of post-holiday blues if I'm honest. I think it's particularly affected by the work related situation (looking for a job, getting an offer, turning it down, expecting things to improve) this year.
The holiday was gone in a flash.
It rained quite a bit and if the rain had been accompanied by thunder and lightning that would have been an even more cool statement, but it was mostly just regular rain and lots of it.
It wasn't quite as bad as up north. The forecasts had been very bad before the week and I think the rain they got was basically predicted to also badly hit the south West. Well it got it on the Sunday when I drove down, but then Monday it was actually rather bright.
Indeed, although it was wetter than was ideal compared to what the forecasts had said it wasn't actually all that bad. It was only really Wednesday where it poxed things up - I'd planned a beach walk day and it rained almost constantly so I couldn't really do that.
Generally I did lots of walking. For the first couple of days I was also very good with diet as I was expecting that when I went to my Dad's at the end of the week I'd end up eating badly, and this was the case, so I think overall it's all sort of balanced out.
However what was very clear to me is how much fitter I am. The walks I did were generally a breeze and they were of a similar length to last year when I found them much more challenging. Indeed I did further walks more often and felt fine.
I've not much else to say - I didn't take any pictures with the weather. I also tried a new route home, which was a lot more fun to drive, but was also therefore more tiring as it required a lot more concentration.
And I have a bit of a case of post-holiday blues if I'm honest. I think it's particularly affected by the work related situation (looking for a job, getting an offer, turning it down, expecting things to improve) this year.
The holiday was gone in a flash.
It rained quite a bit and if the rain had been accompanied by thunder and lightning that would have been an even more cool statement, but it was mostly just regular rain and lots of it.
It wasn't quite as bad as up north. The forecasts had been very bad before the week and I think the rain they got was basically predicted to also badly hit the south West. Well it got it on the Sunday when I drove down, but then Monday it was actually rather bright.
Indeed, although it was wetter than was ideal compared to what the forecasts had said it wasn't actually all that bad. It was only really Wednesday where it poxed things up - I'd planned a beach walk day and it rained almost constantly so I couldn't really do that.
Generally I did lots of walking. For the first couple of days I was also very good with diet as I was expecting that when I went to my Dad's at the end of the week I'd end up eating badly, and this was the case, so I think overall it's all sort of balanced out.
However what was very clear to me is how much fitter I am. The walks I did were generally a breeze and they were of a similar length to last year when I found them much more challenging. Indeed I did further walks more often and felt fine.
I've not much else to say - I didn't take any pictures with the weather. I also tried a new route home, which was a lot more fun to drive, but was also therefore more tiring as it required a lot more concentration.
Friday, 21 September 2012
holiday
I'm off on holiday next week.
I would usually take the first week in October, but there was a bit of a conflagration of events at work which meant I was asked to take a week either side. A week later would put it just that wrong side of getting into the chilly weather so I went for the last week in September.
My plan for this holiday is basically the same as all my late summer holidays. I'll be spending a week in Devon, partly with my Dad (it's his birthday this time of year) and partly just in a random bit of Devon where I'll be doing lots of walking.
I'm sure I'll also be taking far too many books, manga, magazines, DVDs and fansubs with me to consume in the time available as per usual as well. Actually my plan this time is to focus on the last of those - fansubs.
Since my hobby of scanning in anime magazine basically collapsed my watching of fansubs has also virtually stopped as well. I used to cheekily watch a few at work as well, but I'm so busy nowadays that's almost impossible.
I'm therefore hoping to get through a good chunk of them (mainly 2 or 3 episode samplers) over this break. I've also come up with a plan for how I might re-invigorate the scanning hobby as it was something I used to quite enjoy doing, even if I also complained about it a lot.
Anyway, obviously no blogging next week while I'm away. I may take a few pictures while I'm out walking and upload them afterwards, but I'm not too hopeful - the forecast for the week is looking quite damp so I'm kinda expecting that I won't be taking my camera out with me.
I would usually take the first week in October, but there was a bit of a conflagration of events at work which meant I was asked to take a week either side. A week later would put it just that wrong side of getting into the chilly weather so I went for the last week in September.
My plan for this holiday is basically the same as all my late summer holidays. I'll be spending a week in Devon, partly with my Dad (it's his birthday this time of year) and partly just in a random bit of Devon where I'll be doing lots of walking.
I'm sure I'll also be taking far too many books, manga, magazines, DVDs and fansubs with me to consume in the time available as per usual as well. Actually my plan this time is to focus on the last of those - fansubs.
Since my hobby of scanning in anime magazine basically collapsed my watching of fansubs has also virtually stopped as well. I used to cheekily watch a few at work as well, but I'm so busy nowadays that's almost impossible.
I'm therefore hoping to get through a good chunk of them (mainly 2 or 3 episode samplers) over this break. I've also come up with a plan for how I might re-invigorate the scanning hobby as it was something I used to quite enjoy doing, even if I also complained about it a lot.
Anyway, obviously no blogging next week while I'm away. I may take a few pictures while I'm out walking and upload them afterwards, but I'm not too hopeful - the forecast for the week is looking quite damp so I'm kinda expecting that I won't be taking my camera out with me.
Thursday, 20 September 2012
singasnore
This weekend it's the Singapore Grand Prix.
It has the uniqueness of being F1's only night race (one of the Arab ones happens in the evening, but Singapore is properly in the night). And that's about it.
It's a street race has all the traditional street race issue - narrow, almost impossible to overtake, boring layout, slow and too long.
As you may be able to tell I'm not really looking forward to it. Of course I may be proven wrong. Valencia is usually as dull as dishwater, but this year it was a cracker.
However, I've had the feeling in the last few races that the close-ness and random-ness that has tended to characterise this season has started to settle down a bit. The top teams have started to distance themselves from the pack. Saying that it's not a big difference - Sauber did spectacularly well at Monza, for example.
Apparently they put on some interesting events for the spectators at Singapore - they have a big concert with big-name stars and there's a big Ferris wheel you can go in. I'm not sure if that's generally open to the public outside of the races, but certainly during the race you have to get special tickets for it.
But even with that I don't I'd fancy going. I assume it would be horribly hot and humid, even at night and I'm not sure I really see any particular appeal of watching F1 cars at night. So it doesn't appeal on the telly and it doesn't appeal as one to go too - it's therefore a bit of a classic of Bernie's new era or tracks!
The championship overall remains in real contention. Alonso has a big lead and is consistently getting the best out of a car that still isn't the best, even with the improvements Ferrari has made. However, McLaren seem to have finally gotten over their mid-season "jitters".
They started the season with the best car and two of the best drivers, but a combination of issues (pit stops, crashes, unreliability) and perhaps either not updating the car in the right direction or letting others catch up seems to have put them further back than you would have expected at the start of the year.
Singapore actually sits on its own, but it's the only one that does in this final stretch - the last two were double headers and all of the remaining six are too. It's going to be an intense end of the season!
It has the uniqueness of being F1's only night race (one of the Arab ones happens in the evening, but Singapore is properly in the night). And that's about it.
It's a street race has all the traditional street race issue - narrow, almost impossible to overtake, boring layout, slow and too long.
As you may be able to tell I'm not really looking forward to it. Of course I may be proven wrong. Valencia is usually as dull as dishwater, but this year it was a cracker.
However, I've had the feeling in the last few races that the close-ness and random-ness that has tended to characterise this season has started to settle down a bit. The top teams have started to distance themselves from the pack. Saying that it's not a big difference - Sauber did spectacularly well at Monza, for example.
Apparently they put on some interesting events for the spectators at Singapore - they have a big concert with big-name stars and there's a big Ferris wheel you can go in. I'm not sure if that's generally open to the public outside of the races, but certainly during the race you have to get special tickets for it.
But even with that I don't I'd fancy going. I assume it would be horribly hot and humid, even at night and I'm not sure I really see any particular appeal of watching F1 cars at night. So it doesn't appeal on the telly and it doesn't appeal as one to go too - it's therefore a bit of a classic of Bernie's new era or tracks!
The championship overall remains in real contention. Alonso has a big lead and is consistently getting the best out of a car that still isn't the best, even with the improvements Ferrari has made. However, McLaren seem to have finally gotten over their mid-season "jitters".
They started the season with the best car and two of the best drivers, but a combination of issues (pit stops, crashes, unreliability) and perhaps either not updating the car in the right direction or letting others catch up seems to have put them further back than you would have expected at the start of the year.
Singapore actually sits on its own, but it's the only one that does in this final stretch - the last two were double headers and all of the remaining six are too. It's going to be an intense end of the season!
Wednesday, 19 September 2012
arrietty
I have to confess that I've never been a huge fan of the borrowers.
I mean, I'm not saying I actively dislike it; it's just something that's never really appealed to me. I don't really know why - it's a fairly neat idea and clearly has enduring appeal, but I dunno, it's just never really clicked with me.
I am actually really referring to adaptations there. I know it was originally a series of books, but I've never read any of them. Perhaps I would like it more if I did. However, I have seen several adaptations - in particular a series by the BBC when I was a kid.
I mention all this to give background. And also just in case you didn't realise that Arrietty is an adaptation of The Borrowers. Arrietty is essentially the lead character, but it's interesting Ghibli went with that as a title, rather than The Borrowers.
Especially since it seems like a reasonably faithful adaption to the core of the story. I obviously say that not having read them, but the adaptations all seem to have the same core story too, so I'm guessing it's to that far odd.
Perhaps they did it to help make it feel a bit more unique given that they're relocated it to Japan. I don't really see this as a big issue myself. Moving it to Japan hasn't been accompanied by any weird changes to the basic ideas so localising it probably makes sense from a sales point of view.
Another thing to note is that Arrietty isn't a Miyazaki film - people tend to assume all Ghibli output is Miyazaki and he was the Exec Producer, the originator of the idea to adapt The Borrowers and the screenwriter so he had a big part to play but the film is directed by Hiromasa Yonebayashi.
Interestingly Hiromasa was actually responsible (key animation) for one of the bits I enjoyed most in Ponyo where the fish escape from submarine. And Arrietty has some really nice touches in the animation, although I have to confess some of it was also a bit clunky - the budget perhaps didn't quite match the ambition.
It's also perfectly reasonable, and is particularly suitable for a younger audience. The real problem with it is that it lacks a bit of depth. Unlike previous Miyazaki penned stories there isn't really much in the way of depth - it's all there on the surface.
So yeah, nice enough, but I'm not sure I'd want to watch it again and again.
I mean, I'm not saying I actively dislike it; it's just something that's never really appealed to me. I don't really know why - it's a fairly neat idea and clearly has enduring appeal, but I dunno, it's just never really clicked with me.
I am actually really referring to adaptations there. I know it was originally a series of books, but I've never read any of them. Perhaps I would like it more if I did. However, I have seen several adaptations - in particular a series by the BBC when I was a kid.
I mention all this to give background. And also just in case you didn't realise that Arrietty is an adaptation of The Borrowers. Arrietty is essentially the lead character, but it's interesting Ghibli went with that as a title, rather than The Borrowers.
Especially since it seems like a reasonably faithful adaption to the core of the story. I obviously say that not having read them, but the adaptations all seem to have the same core story too, so I'm guessing it's to that far odd.
Perhaps they did it to help make it feel a bit more unique given that they're relocated it to Japan. I don't really see this as a big issue myself. Moving it to Japan hasn't been accompanied by any weird changes to the basic ideas so localising it probably makes sense from a sales point of view.
Another thing to note is that Arrietty isn't a Miyazaki film - people tend to assume all Ghibli output is Miyazaki and he was the Exec Producer, the originator of the idea to adapt The Borrowers and the screenwriter so he had a big part to play but the film is directed by Hiromasa Yonebayashi.
Interestingly Hiromasa was actually responsible (key animation) for one of the bits I enjoyed most in Ponyo where the fish escape from submarine. And Arrietty has some really nice touches in the animation, although I have to confess some of it was also a bit clunky - the budget perhaps didn't quite match the ambition.
It's also perfectly reasonable, and is particularly suitable for a younger audience. The real problem with it is that it lacks a bit of depth. Unlike previous Miyazaki penned stories there isn't really much in the way of depth - it's all there on the surface.
So yeah, nice enough, but I'm not sure I'd want to watch it again and again.
Tuesday, 18 September 2012
re-arrangement
So I thought I'd blog today about the sort out of my telly corner I did while I was setting up the BT vision box.
Basically the BT vision box represented something of a crunch point for the TV stack, particularly in terms of plugs. I have a long-lead gang plug that has six sockets and surge protection and in days gone past this was plenty for the TV corner. However, just recently I've added a few things to it that meant I've actually changed another ganger off it too.
But even with this extra capacity I didn't have a slot for the BT vision box. Part of the problem has become redundancy versus convenience.
A while back I decided to get Blu-Ray, but I was not keen on the players and proper multi-region machines cost an absolute fortune. There are machines where, like with some DVD players, you could essentially 'crack' them to be multi-region, but this generally involves farting about with firm-ware that you constantly have to update.
My solution then was to get a PC I could use as a media centre. I blogged at the time how this turned out to be a huge faff as well, but I've come to a point of it working okay.
Now being what it is this PC can obviously play multi-region DVDs, but because of the faff involved I ended up keeping my multi-region DVD player. I'm not really explaining this very well. Basically when trying to add the BT vision box I already had these electrical devices to account for:
A 6-point surge protected ganger with the following plugged in:
The four plug ganger had the PC plugged in but meant I could also plug in the following as needed:
So as you can see at worst case that adds up to more sockets that I had available. In practice I never needed all things on at all times, but faffing about around the back of stuff to unplug things (and making sure you got the right plug!) was a pain.
There were also a couple of other issues. Firstly my picture through my PVR (via the aerial input) has been quite poor lately. It has a lot of interference and no amount of switching plugs and cables seemed to fix it. The solution was simple - use the SCART, but they were in an unknown box in the shed.
Secondly I don't use my VCR at all - now that we've switched over to digital I don't need to keep it as a back-up.
Thirdly there was the redundancy of having the DVD player and the PC.
And lastly my Amp has only 2 optical digital inputs. As such a bit of rationalisation was in order and I decided to have a bit of a clean-up too.
I've taken the VCR out of the loop, but in the end I decided not to get rid of the DVD player. Instead I've switched the optical cable it had to the box. My theory now is that if I want to just quickly watch a DVD the player is there, but if I want to watch it properly with the full sound thing I will have to use the PC.
Hopefully as I get used to it I will find the DVD becomes properly redundant like the VCR. However, part of the issue there is I've been using a wireless mouse and keyboard and while the keyboard works well, the mouse is a pain as I like to take the batteries out and that means re-synching it every time I use it.
I also found my other SCART cables and plugged the PVR in via SCART. The noise is all gone and the picture is a little better, though as I was afraid it has a few issues with up-scaling, but then that's a pretty standard issue many people have.
So there you have it - my only plugging in I need to do is for the base amp / lamps and I'm fine with those. Although as mentioned yesterday the BT box's LEDs are incredibly bright and it's weirdly fronted so I can't easily block the light. I may try and stick some tape over it (I'm unsure if this is where the receiver is for the remote signal) or simply plug it in when needed.
Basically the BT vision box represented something of a crunch point for the TV stack, particularly in terms of plugs. I have a long-lead gang plug that has six sockets and surge protection and in days gone past this was plenty for the TV corner. However, just recently I've added a few things to it that meant I've actually changed another ganger off it too.
But even with this extra capacity I didn't have a slot for the BT vision box. Part of the problem has become redundancy versus convenience.
A while back I decided to get Blu-Ray, but I was not keen on the players and proper multi-region machines cost an absolute fortune. There are machines where, like with some DVD players, you could essentially 'crack' them to be multi-region, but this generally involves farting about with firm-ware that you constantly have to update.
My solution then was to get a PC I could use as a media centre. I blogged at the time how this turned out to be a huge faff as well, but I've come to a point of it working okay.
Now being what it is this PC can obviously play multi-region DVDs, but because of the faff involved I ended up keeping my multi-region DVD player. I'm not really explaining this very well. Basically when trying to add the BT vision box I already had these electrical devices to account for:
A 6-point surge protected ganger with the following plugged in:
- TV
- PVR
- DVD player
- Dolby digital Amp
- Sub-Woofer
- four point ganger
The four plug ganger had the PC plugged in but meant I could also plug in the following as needed:
- 2 * lamps on timers (my landlord is paranoid about security and likes me to have these on during winter)
- Bass guitar amp
- VCR (yes, kicking it old school)
So as you can see at worst case that adds up to more sockets that I had available. In practice I never needed all things on at all times, but faffing about around the back of stuff to unplug things (and making sure you got the right plug!) was a pain.
There were also a couple of other issues. Firstly my picture through my PVR (via the aerial input) has been quite poor lately. It has a lot of interference and no amount of switching plugs and cables seemed to fix it. The solution was simple - use the SCART, but they were in an unknown box in the shed.
Secondly I don't use my VCR at all - now that we've switched over to digital I don't need to keep it as a back-up.
Thirdly there was the redundancy of having the DVD player and the PC.
And lastly my Amp has only 2 optical digital inputs. As such a bit of rationalisation was in order and I decided to have a bit of a clean-up too.
I've taken the VCR out of the loop, but in the end I decided not to get rid of the DVD player. Instead I've switched the optical cable it had to the box. My theory now is that if I want to just quickly watch a DVD the player is there, but if I want to watch it properly with the full sound thing I will have to use the PC.
Hopefully as I get used to it I will find the DVD becomes properly redundant like the VCR. However, part of the issue there is I've been using a wireless mouse and keyboard and while the keyboard works well, the mouse is a pain as I like to take the batteries out and that means re-synching it every time I use it.
I also found my other SCART cables and plugged the PVR in via SCART. The noise is all gone and the picture is a little better, though as I was afraid it has a few issues with up-scaling, but then that's a pretty standard issue many people have.
So there you have it - my only plugging in I need to do is for the base amp / lamps and I'm fine with those. Although as mentioned yesterday the BT box's LEDs are incredibly bright and it's weirdly fronted so I can't easily block the light. I may try and stick some tape over it (I'm unsure if this is where the receiver is for the remote signal) or simply plug it in when needed.
Monday, 17 September 2012
fuzzier than expected
So I spent some time this weekend setting up and playing with the BT vision + box.
First disappointment is that the "+" doesn't stand for HD. Indeed complaints abound on BT's support site that BT vision isn't HD.
Well, I say it isn't HD - some of the on demand type content is HD, so the box is obviously capable of outputting HD. It's just that the Freeview side of it isn't HD. Which is bonkers. you could understand it when if first launched, but why put out a new bit of kit that has some HD on demand content and HDMI and optical audio connectors but only has SD tuners - it even has two tuners so can record two things simultaneously, but it's not HD. Weird.
The second disappointment is that some of the content only appears to be available if you get the 'unlimited' package. Note that even though it's "unlimited", there's still stuff you can only get by paying for it. So it's unlimited apart from the limitations.
Now I understood this going in - it says on the website you have to pay for some bits if you've not got the unlimited package. that's fine - pay for what you want. Except the granularity suggested by the website is very broad - films not available at all, everything else you pay 50p and up for. Except that's not actually true - some of the non-film bits you also can't get unless you have the unlimited package. And I mean not at all - you can't pay to get them individually, you need the full unlimited package.
The third disappointment wasn't so much a disappointment, but that getting this unlimited package would not be particularly good value. Okay, you get all that stuff in the package, but most of it I've either seen or don't really want to see. I mean there's stuff I'd like to see, but not enough to make unlimited good value for money by a long way. Certainly not since most of the stuff I'd want to see you can pay for.
On the up side, the stuff available via the full-on paying methods (i.e. you pay irrespective of which package you've got) isn't too bad at all. There's a reasonable selection of films, for example.
However, unlike the other films you can only get via unlimited it wasn't at all clear if they were available in HD. Certainly some of the trailers looked quite high definition, but that may just be because the trailer is at a higher bit rate. I shall have to give the searching another go and see if that reveals the answer, or just give it a try if not.
Another up-side was that the iPlayer and the other catch-up devices work quite well. Well, iPlayer crashed the time I tried to give it a go properly, but then it's crashed when I've used it normally too.
A good thing there of course is that iPlayer is available in HD so those programs I can't watch as HD on Freeview I can't watch on the catch-up. And since I record and watch back 95% of my viewing that should suit me fine.
The last disappointment is the amount of light it puts out. Now this is a bit of a specific to me one, but I live in a bedsit, which means my TV stuff is in the same room as me. I also have difficulty sleeping when there are bright sources of light and the vision box really pumps out a lot of light.
Now I'm used to that to some extent and am adept at covering panels with clocks on at night to block the light. The problem is the vision box has a weird curvy front panel and it's so bright that this didn't really work last night. I'll have a fiddle over the next few days, but I've a feeling I may end up unplugging it and only plugging it back in when I want to watch some on-demand stuff.
Overall then I'm a bit disappointed - I certainly don't think it's worth £4 a month. I mean my PVR is way better at doing Freeview and easier to use and the few things the vision box does better are actually really only at their best if you pay 3 times that.
First disappointment is that the "+" doesn't stand for HD. Indeed complaints abound on BT's support site that BT vision isn't HD.
Well, I say it isn't HD - some of the on demand type content is HD, so the box is obviously capable of outputting HD. It's just that the Freeview side of it isn't HD. Which is bonkers. you could understand it when if first launched, but why put out a new bit of kit that has some HD on demand content and HDMI and optical audio connectors but only has SD tuners - it even has two tuners so can record two things simultaneously, but it's not HD. Weird.
The second disappointment is that some of the content only appears to be available if you get the 'unlimited' package. Note that even though it's "unlimited", there's still stuff you can only get by paying for it. So it's unlimited apart from the limitations.
Now I understood this going in - it says on the website you have to pay for some bits if you've not got the unlimited package. that's fine - pay for what you want. Except the granularity suggested by the website is very broad - films not available at all, everything else you pay 50p and up for. Except that's not actually true - some of the non-film bits you also can't get unless you have the unlimited package. And I mean not at all - you can't pay to get them individually, you need the full unlimited package.
The third disappointment wasn't so much a disappointment, but that getting this unlimited package would not be particularly good value. Okay, you get all that stuff in the package, but most of it I've either seen or don't really want to see. I mean there's stuff I'd like to see, but not enough to make unlimited good value for money by a long way. Certainly not since most of the stuff I'd want to see you can pay for.
On the up side, the stuff available via the full-on paying methods (i.e. you pay irrespective of which package you've got) isn't too bad at all. There's a reasonable selection of films, for example.
However, unlike the other films you can only get via unlimited it wasn't at all clear if they were available in HD. Certainly some of the trailers looked quite high definition, but that may just be because the trailer is at a higher bit rate. I shall have to give the searching another go and see if that reveals the answer, or just give it a try if not.
Another up-side was that the iPlayer and the other catch-up devices work quite well. Well, iPlayer crashed the time I tried to give it a go properly, but then it's crashed when I've used it normally too.
A good thing there of course is that iPlayer is available in HD so those programs I can't watch as HD on Freeview I can't watch on the catch-up. And since I record and watch back 95% of my viewing that should suit me fine.
The last disappointment is the amount of light it puts out. Now this is a bit of a specific to me one, but I live in a bedsit, which means my TV stuff is in the same room as me. I also have difficulty sleeping when there are bright sources of light and the vision box really pumps out a lot of light.
Now I'm used to that to some extent and am adept at covering panels with clocks on at night to block the light. The problem is the vision box has a weird curvy front panel and it's so bright that this didn't really work last night. I'll have a fiddle over the next few days, but I've a feeling I may end up unplugging it and only plugging it back in when I want to watch some on-demand stuff.
Overall then I'm a bit disappointed - I certainly don't think it's worth £4 a month. I mean my PVR is way better at doing Freeview and easier to use and the few things the vision box does better are actually really only at their best if you pay 3 times that.
Friday, 14 September 2012
a new vision
I think I forgot yesterday to explain why a shaving brush may help with my shaving.
Basically, the idea of shaving foam is that it does two things - it lubricates the blade as it passes across the skin, but the second is more relevant in that it essentially holds the hairs up off the skin surface.
Beard hair has a tendency to lay flat to the surface of the skin and this is one of the things that makes it difficult to shave. For me this seems particularly acute - my beard hair lies very flat and I also have some weird changes in direction of hair, particularly on my neck where the bottom part grows up and the rest grows down (well, sideways, actually).
This is also particularly ironic for me as my head hair tends to stick straight up for a good half an inch before the weight eventually pulls it down, and even then it's super fluffy. This was okay when I was younger, but recently I've started to thin and it looks odd because you can see my scalp, even though the hair is long. This actually prompted me to trim it off.
Anyway, the idea is that by using a brush you really get in and around the hairs, helping to hold them up. When applying the foam with your fingers, the big flat surface of your fingers has a tendency to flatten the hairs.
That's the theory, anyway - we shall see if it helps.
I recently got myself BT Vision.
They've had a special offer on where it's only £4 a month and the box is free. Now obviously I already have Freeview - and, indeed, the PVR I've got is a Humax one, which is generally regarded to be the best make. My dad has BT vision and a Humax digibox and says the Humax is way better and he's obviously been able to compare things long-term.
However, my PVR is not High definition and this Freeview is (well, I think it is - I haven't actually plugged it in yet, but more on that in a mo). It's also got this new on-demand service. This is the one that was announced a little while ago - I can't for the life of me remember the name they gave it, but it involves several of the big players.
As I mentioned I've not actually started the box up yet. My first problem is that I obviously need a clear period where I'm not watching or recording stuff and so that's put out most of the evening. But also I have a box of AV cables which I will need to play with various configurations and that's in the garage so I'll need to get it out. I'll also need to find my longer network cable as the one they supplied is about 20cm too short.
I'm therefore going to play with it this weekend. The thing I'm not sure about is to do with pass-through of signal. A while back I was having real problems with my PVR in that the signal was breaking up. However, by chance I discovered that by switching it around with my VCR (so it really was a while ago!) the signal improved massively.
So I'm not sure if I should split the signal and send it through both boxes independently (the BT vision has a HDMI connector - hence my assumption it's HD) or if it'll be okay passing the signal through.
I'll also probably take the opportunity to have a bit of clean around - a lot of dust tends to accumulate around the TV area.
Basically, the idea of shaving foam is that it does two things - it lubricates the blade as it passes across the skin, but the second is more relevant in that it essentially holds the hairs up off the skin surface.
Beard hair has a tendency to lay flat to the surface of the skin and this is one of the things that makes it difficult to shave. For me this seems particularly acute - my beard hair lies very flat and I also have some weird changes in direction of hair, particularly on my neck where the bottom part grows up and the rest grows down (well, sideways, actually).
This is also particularly ironic for me as my head hair tends to stick straight up for a good half an inch before the weight eventually pulls it down, and even then it's super fluffy. This was okay when I was younger, but recently I've started to thin and it looks odd because you can see my scalp, even though the hair is long. This actually prompted me to trim it off.
Anyway, the idea is that by using a brush you really get in and around the hairs, helping to hold them up. When applying the foam with your fingers, the big flat surface of your fingers has a tendency to flatten the hairs.
That's the theory, anyway - we shall see if it helps.
I recently got myself BT Vision.
They've had a special offer on where it's only £4 a month and the box is free. Now obviously I already have Freeview - and, indeed, the PVR I've got is a Humax one, which is generally regarded to be the best make. My dad has BT vision and a Humax digibox and says the Humax is way better and he's obviously been able to compare things long-term.
However, my PVR is not High definition and this Freeview is (well, I think it is - I haven't actually plugged it in yet, but more on that in a mo). It's also got this new on-demand service. This is the one that was announced a little while ago - I can't for the life of me remember the name they gave it, but it involves several of the big players.
As I mentioned I've not actually started the box up yet. My first problem is that I obviously need a clear period where I'm not watching or recording stuff and so that's put out most of the evening. But also I have a box of AV cables which I will need to play with various configurations and that's in the garage so I'll need to get it out. I'll also need to find my longer network cable as the one they supplied is about 20cm too short.
I'm therefore going to play with it this weekend. The thing I'm not sure about is to do with pass-through of signal. A while back I was having real problems with my PVR in that the signal was breaking up. However, by chance I discovered that by switching it around with my VCR (so it really was a while ago!) the signal improved massively.
So I'm not sure if I should split the signal and send it through both boxes independently (the BT vision has a HDMI connector - hence my assumption it's HD) or if it'll be okay passing the signal through.
I'll also probably take the opportunity to have a bit of clean around - a lot of dust tends to accumulate around the TV area.
Thursday, 13 September 2012
unusual purchasing
There hasn't been any news on the missing slice of my pay packet.
I think my boss is going to try to just sort it out for this month and not give me the missing amount for last month. Yet another disappointment.
Either way, with my wage increase I've been looking at loosening the old economic belt a bit and considering a few unusual purchases. Well, unusual for me - most are pretty normal for normal people who don't spend all their money on DVDs and books.
By that I mean clothes in that I have been looking at the various options for refreshing my work wardrobe in particular, but also a few other clothing and related things I need - a new dressing gown, in particular, for example.
Anyway, the one I specifically wanted to mention was that I'm looking at buying a shaving brush.
When I first started work I only shaved every other day. I don't mean I could get away with only shaving every other day as my beard is thick, dark, and grows quickly, but that I used to just go to work with stubble.
However, as I got older and as I've thinned down a bit, it's began to look like I was growing a full beard every other day. As such, I started shaving every day (well, work day). This meant I had to slightly adapt my shaving style as I used to close shave, but if I close shave every day I'm much more likely to get razor burn and stuff.
However, I've been somewhat disappointed with the results and one of the things I've been looking at as a possible solution is getting a proper shaving brush.
The best brushes are apparently made from badger hair and are surprisingly expensive. I mean, some obviously cost a fortune because of branding or whatever, but even cheap ones are several pounds. When you consider how "old technology" they are that's pretty expensive.
Another thing I've been looking at is mu whole teeth cleaning regime. Primarily I've been looking at getting a good electric toothbrush. I used to have a cheap one and it was okay, but it was battery powered (as in normal A4s) and after only a week or two you would be able to feel that the power was going down, even though I used the batteries with the power testers on them and they would say the battery was still 90% okay.
As such I've been looking at getting a proper rechargeable one, but there are so many different types it's quite confusing. Particularly since it seems like a relatively simple thing - the head oscillates, cleans teeth, done.
Lastly that I'll mention is a nose hair trimmer.
I bought a cheap one a while back when the nose hair issue was at a point where plucking them was more agony than I could take and it did okay for a while, but again, it's battery powered and quickly deteriorates in effectiveness.
I also got free one when I bought my hair trimmer, but it has a weirdly long guard on the blades and so leaves the hairs really long. Okay, they're not really long, but they're long enough that it defeats the point of using the trimmer.
The problem here is almost the opposite of the toothbrushes - there seem to be very few models and most are quite poorly reviewed and rated. As such it's difficult finding one that's not too expensive but also does the job.
I think my boss is going to try to just sort it out for this month and not give me the missing amount for last month. Yet another disappointment.
Either way, with my wage increase I've been looking at loosening the old economic belt a bit and considering a few unusual purchases. Well, unusual for me - most are pretty normal for normal people who don't spend all their money on DVDs and books.
By that I mean clothes in that I have been looking at the various options for refreshing my work wardrobe in particular, but also a few other clothing and related things I need - a new dressing gown, in particular, for example.
Anyway, the one I specifically wanted to mention was that I'm looking at buying a shaving brush.
When I first started work I only shaved every other day. I don't mean I could get away with only shaving every other day as my beard is thick, dark, and grows quickly, but that I used to just go to work with stubble.
However, as I got older and as I've thinned down a bit, it's began to look like I was growing a full beard every other day. As such, I started shaving every day (well, work day). This meant I had to slightly adapt my shaving style as I used to close shave, but if I close shave every day I'm much more likely to get razor burn and stuff.
However, I've been somewhat disappointed with the results and one of the things I've been looking at as a possible solution is getting a proper shaving brush.
The best brushes are apparently made from badger hair and are surprisingly expensive. I mean, some obviously cost a fortune because of branding or whatever, but even cheap ones are several pounds. When you consider how "old technology" they are that's pretty expensive.
Another thing I've been looking at is mu whole teeth cleaning regime. Primarily I've been looking at getting a good electric toothbrush. I used to have a cheap one and it was okay, but it was battery powered (as in normal A4s) and after only a week or two you would be able to feel that the power was going down, even though I used the batteries with the power testers on them and they would say the battery was still 90% okay.
As such I've been looking at getting a proper rechargeable one, but there are so many different types it's quite confusing. Particularly since it seems like a relatively simple thing - the head oscillates, cleans teeth, done.
Lastly that I'll mention is a nose hair trimmer.
I bought a cheap one a while back when the nose hair issue was at a point where plucking them was more agony than I could take and it did okay for a while, but again, it's battery powered and quickly deteriorates in effectiveness.
I also got free one when I bought my hair trimmer, but it has a weirdly long guard on the blades and so leaves the hairs really long. Okay, they're not really long, but they're long enough that it defeats the point of using the trimmer.
The problem here is almost the opposite of the toothbrushes - there seem to be very few models and most are quite poorly reviewed and rated. As such it's difficult finding one that's not too expensive but also does the job.
Wednesday, 12 September 2012
transformers: revenge of the fallen
Oh dear.
I said when I reviewed it that I didn't hate the first Transformers film. It was by the much-hated Michael Bay and it seemed to draw a fair amount of flack, but I personally thought it was okay as a popcorn action movie.
Don't get me wrong - there were a few things that didn't quite work for me and they fiddled with stuff in a way that also didn't quite work (Bumblebee isn't a VW bug?), but it was an enjoyable enough action movie with big giant transforming robots. There was also some internal logic to the thing, particularly as it went for a fairly simple story.
The second film is an abomination, particularly in this case because the plot is horrible and almost nothing makes any sense.
I guess I should warn for spoilers as I thought I'd lay out some of the more annoying ones.
A particularly galling thing was when the decepticons revive megatron. At the end of the first film they dumped him and some of the other decepticons at the bottom of the Marianas Trench (I think - certainly into the sea). Quite why they did this instead of smashing them to atoms I'm not sure, but in this film to revive them all they do is send down some repairing robots who stitch them back together and all's fine.
Clearly being killed, broken up, and dumped at the bottom of the ocean, subjecting their metal bodies to salt water, incredible cold and staggering pressure is absolutely no problem for your average decepticon... So why didn't Prime tell them to do something more effective!
Of course later on in the film, when Prime dies, they have to go through some rigmarole involving an ancient artefact and a sock (don't ask) to revive him. Yeah, because consistency is for pussies!
Then there's the bit where the decepticons go after Buster with a human-impersonating Decepticon. A human impersonating decepticon who is incredibly realistic. Because of course if you were able to impersonate humans you wouldn't do something like impersonate all the world leaders and take over the place. No, you'd impersonate a hot chick in order to try to get at some knowledge Buster has.
Then there's the whole thing about Megatron working for some uber-evil dude who lives on the moon. Yeah, the uber-evil dude who there's no mention of in the first film at all.
The uber-evil dude who all the other primes in ancient times (eh?) had to sacrifice themselves to create what is basically a key for his uber-evil device that he was going to use to kill life in the galaxy instead of kicking his ass. Y'know, the uber-evil device hidden inside the pyramids that we've never spotted before.
What the fuck is this bull-shit?
I said when I reviewed it that I didn't hate the first Transformers film. It was by the much-hated Michael Bay and it seemed to draw a fair amount of flack, but I personally thought it was okay as a popcorn action movie.
Don't get me wrong - there were a few things that didn't quite work for me and they fiddled with stuff in a way that also didn't quite work (Bumblebee isn't a VW bug?), but it was an enjoyable enough action movie with big giant transforming robots. There was also some internal logic to the thing, particularly as it went for a fairly simple story.
The second film is an abomination, particularly in this case because the plot is horrible and almost nothing makes any sense.
I guess I should warn for spoilers as I thought I'd lay out some of the more annoying ones.
A particularly galling thing was when the decepticons revive megatron. At the end of the first film they dumped him and some of the other decepticons at the bottom of the Marianas Trench (I think - certainly into the sea). Quite why they did this instead of smashing them to atoms I'm not sure, but in this film to revive them all they do is send down some repairing robots who stitch them back together and all's fine.
Clearly being killed, broken up, and dumped at the bottom of the ocean, subjecting their metal bodies to salt water, incredible cold and staggering pressure is absolutely no problem for your average decepticon... So why didn't Prime tell them to do something more effective!
Of course later on in the film, when Prime dies, they have to go through some rigmarole involving an ancient artefact and a sock (don't ask) to revive him. Yeah, because consistency is for pussies!
Then there's the bit where the decepticons go after Buster with a human-impersonating Decepticon. A human impersonating decepticon who is incredibly realistic. Because of course if you were able to impersonate humans you wouldn't do something like impersonate all the world leaders and take over the place. No, you'd impersonate a hot chick in order to try to get at some knowledge Buster has.
Then there's the whole thing about Megatron working for some uber-evil dude who lives on the moon. Yeah, the uber-evil dude who there's no mention of in the first film at all.
The uber-evil dude who all the other primes in ancient times (eh?) had to sacrifice themselves to create what is basically a key for his uber-evil device that he was going to use to kill life in the galaxy instead of kicking his ass. Y'know, the uber-evil device hidden inside the pyramids that we've never spotted before.
What the fuck is this bull-shit?
Tuesday, 11 September 2012
disappointed
I was rather disappointed with my weigh in this last Sunday.
I thought I'd done quite well during the week with only a few relatively small slips. However, I'd only lost a pound, which was quite disappointing. Particularly since my weight has been see-sawing around without any real gain or loss for a good few months now.
Having said that, when I think back at the week I can see that the small slips I'd felt I'd made were actually probably much bigger than I'd really thought. I ate a few too many sweet things and it all adds up. Also I'd really struggled with the walking.
Well, I'd actually really struggled with sleeping, having had a night where I'd basically been unable to get to sleep at all and with this then being followed up by a night where I'd woken up incredibly early. Usually when I have a bad night the next night I sleep like I'm in coma, but this time I woke up at 4:30AM, a good two hours before I usually get up.
And this waking up early pattern suddenly seems to have become something of a norm - with the exception of Sunday I've been wide awake at least an hour before my alarm was due. I've actually started to suspect that something is going on, like someone is getting up early for wake and making a noise that wakes me up, but I've no real evidence for that and besides, I usually sleep with earplugs in.
Anyway, the point is that the lack of sleep left me very tired and therefore in no real mood to do much walking during the week. Now usually there's a compensation when I'm suffering from insomnia in that I burn a lot of calories when I'm awake lots of hours like that, but in this case I'm not sure it's quite worked like that.
It was all rather disappointing, as I say.
In fact, I got rather depressed about it all on Sunday and ended up buying some actual proper chocolate bars when my walk took me past Sainsbury's and scarfing them. I felt bad... but also good.
What's been particularly frustrating over the last few months is that I've not been losing weight. I still do lots of walking and it's not like I'm eating loads of bad stuff like I used to, but I don't seem to lose weight.
I mean, don't get me wrong - I know bad bits I'm eating and the walking are cancelling each other out, but the depressing part of it is that it's not loads of naughty eating, it's just a bit. It's like I can't even have a bit of fun.
I thought I'd done quite well during the week with only a few relatively small slips. However, I'd only lost a pound, which was quite disappointing. Particularly since my weight has been see-sawing around without any real gain or loss for a good few months now.
Having said that, when I think back at the week I can see that the small slips I'd felt I'd made were actually probably much bigger than I'd really thought. I ate a few too many sweet things and it all adds up. Also I'd really struggled with the walking.
Well, I'd actually really struggled with sleeping, having had a night where I'd basically been unable to get to sleep at all and with this then being followed up by a night where I'd woken up incredibly early. Usually when I have a bad night the next night I sleep like I'm in coma, but this time I woke up at 4:30AM, a good two hours before I usually get up.
And this waking up early pattern suddenly seems to have become something of a norm - with the exception of Sunday I've been wide awake at least an hour before my alarm was due. I've actually started to suspect that something is going on, like someone is getting up early for wake and making a noise that wakes me up, but I've no real evidence for that and besides, I usually sleep with earplugs in.
Anyway, the point is that the lack of sleep left me very tired and therefore in no real mood to do much walking during the week. Now usually there's a compensation when I'm suffering from insomnia in that I burn a lot of calories when I'm awake lots of hours like that, but in this case I'm not sure it's quite worked like that.
It was all rather disappointing, as I say.
In fact, I got rather depressed about it all on Sunday and ended up buying some actual proper chocolate bars when my walk took me past Sainsbury's and scarfing them. I felt bad... but also good.
What's been particularly frustrating over the last few months is that I've not been losing weight. I still do lots of walking and it's not like I'm eating loads of bad stuff like I used to, but I don't seem to lose weight.
I mean, don't get me wrong - I know bad bits I'm eating and the walking are cancelling each other out, but the depressing part of it is that it's not loads of naughty eating, it's just a bit. It's like I can't even have a bit of fun.
Monday, 10 September 2012
the crucible of speed
Monza is the fastest circuit in the current F1 calendar.
That also makes it the shortest race and usually doesn't last much more than an hour. I also have it logged in my memory as not normally being a particularly good race - with so few corners and most of the corners there are being chicanes, overtaking opportunities should be relatively low in number.
It's not like there's a big technical section where a driver can make a mistake and allow his rival to catch. And knowing where to defend is hardly a stretch of the imagination - the handful of corners. And yet in recent years it's produced some really good opportunities. And it's generally true that overtaking tends to happen when you have a fast straight and then a tight bend and Monza has a few of those.
This last weekend it was a good race. There was plenty of overtaking, a few incidents and even a few strategic elements that came into play. The last of these was particularly surprising as, being such a simple circuit, you would think strategy was minimal.
However, it was strategy that basically let Perez get to second place. The problem was that the degradation of performance of the tyres meant that towards the end the front runners - who were by then all on very old harder tyres - were easy meat for Perez who'd used the harder tyres on his first stint and stayed out for a long time on them. That meant he had fresher softer tyres, which are quicker, and he didn't have to worry too much about making them last.
But the front runners were faced with a dilemma - if they came in for new tyres they'd have ended up behind they're closes rivals on circuit who didn't with no guarantees of being able to overtake them. The gamble worked out for Hamilton who was just far enough in front to stay that way for the end of the race, but Alonso and Massa both ended up being overtaken.
I have to say this race was probably the first really big victim of the BBCs new program pattern. They only showed highlights and, as mentioned, the race itself is only just over an hour long, so what they showed was only about 45 minutes (I think _ I didn't time it).
They did broadcast both race and practice on Radio 5 live, so I listened to those, but they didn't broadcast any of the practice sessions at all. None of them were on TV, obviously, but they also didn't put them on 5live or Sports Extra. I'm pretty sure they weren't on the internet either in anything but "text update" format.
Now if it had been a total duffer that would have been okay, but clearly it was actually quite entertaining. And that's one of the big problems with this only showing highlights for some races - there's no real way of predicting which are going to be the good races.
Take Valencia - it's always been as dull as dishwater and the BBC said they'd show the full thing. But then they lucked out and this year it was really good for once!
That also makes it the shortest race and usually doesn't last much more than an hour. I also have it logged in my memory as not normally being a particularly good race - with so few corners and most of the corners there are being chicanes, overtaking opportunities should be relatively low in number.
It's not like there's a big technical section where a driver can make a mistake and allow his rival to catch. And knowing where to defend is hardly a stretch of the imagination - the handful of corners. And yet in recent years it's produced some really good opportunities. And it's generally true that overtaking tends to happen when you have a fast straight and then a tight bend and Monza has a few of those.
This last weekend it was a good race. There was plenty of overtaking, a few incidents and even a few strategic elements that came into play. The last of these was particularly surprising as, being such a simple circuit, you would think strategy was minimal.
However, it was strategy that basically let Perez get to second place. The problem was that the degradation of performance of the tyres meant that towards the end the front runners - who were by then all on very old harder tyres - were easy meat for Perez who'd used the harder tyres on his first stint and stayed out for a long time on them. That meant he had fresher softer tyres, which are quicker, and he didn't have to worry too much about making them last.
But the front runners were faced with a dilemma - if they came in for new tyres they'd have ended up behind they're closes rivals on circuit who didn't with no guarantees of being able to overtake them. The gamble worked out for Hamilton who was just far enough in front to stay that way for the end of the race, but Alonso and Massa both ended up being overtaken.
I have to say this race was probably the first really big victim of the BBCs new program pattern. They only showed highlights and, as mentioned, the race itself is only just over an hour long, so what they showed was only about 45 minutes (I think _ I didn't time it).
They did broadcast both race and practice on Radio 5 live, so I listened to those, but they didn't broadcast any of the practice sessions at all. None of them were on TV, obviously, but they also didn't put them on 5live or Sports Extra. I'm pretty sure they weren't on the internet either in anything but "text update" format.
Now if it had been a total duffer that would have been okay, but clearly it was actually quite entertaining. And that's one of the big problems with this only showing highlights for some races - there's no real way of predicting which are going to be the good races.
Take Valencia - it's always been as dull as dishwater and the BBC said they'd show the full thing. But then they lucked out and this year it was really good for once!
Friday, 7 September 2012
monza
Well, Monza this weekend.
It's in quick succession with Belgium as one of these double headers. We've a few of these now until the end of the season.
I have to confess Monza is not usually a great race. I guess in its favour it is usually one of the shortest! The circuit is basically quite simple, and they get very high speeds on the long straights (though a few chicanes have been introduced to slow them down over the years). It's quite Italian in that sense, I suppose.
However, it does mean that there isn't much in the way of opportunities for overtaking and so it can be quite processional, but as I say not too long winded.
The highlight of Monza is usually the tiffosi who are basically the Italian fans. They're rather partisan, being biased in favour of Ferrari. I can recall quite a few races where good chunks of the crowd upped and left after both of the Ferraris crashed out!
I'm hoping Lewis does quite well. He started the season well with lots of consistency, but just recently he's been in a few incidents that have cost him quite a few points. I'm still of the opinion that Alonso is probably going to win, but if there is to be a proper battle for the championship I would rather it was between him and Alonso.
I've actually got a feeling that what will happen is that the others will essentially end up taking lots of points off of each other, a bit like last year.
It's in quick succession with Belgium as one of these double headers. We've a few of these now until the end of the season.
I have to confess Monza is not usually a great race. I guess in its favour it is usually one of the shortest! The circuit is basically quite simple, and they get very high speeds on the long straights (though a few chicanes have been introduced to slow them down over the years). It's quite Italian in that sense, I suppose.
However, it does mean that there isn't much in the way of opportunities for overtaking and so it can be quite processional, but as I say not too long winded.
The highlight of Monza is usually the tiffosi who are basically the Italian fans. They're rather partisan, being biased in favour of Ferrari. I can recall quite a few races where good chunks of the crowd upped and left after both of the Ferraris crashed out!
I'm hoping Lewis does quite well. He started the season well with lots of consistency, but just recently he's been in a few incidents that have cost him quite a few points. I'm still of the opinion that Alonso is probably going to win, but if there is to be a proper battle for the championship I would rather it was between him and Alonso.
I've actually got a feeling that what will happen is that the others will essentially end up taking lots of points off of each other, a bit like last year.
Thursday, 6 September 2012
ruined shoes?
One of the things I was going to blog about last week but didn't was the weather and walking.
On the bank holiday weekend we got some horrible weather on the Saturday afternoon. I'd seen the forecasts, but they were quite vague and the weather in the morning was okay. As I mentioned I worked very late on the Friday so I ended up quite delayed on the Saturday and it was a bit later in the afternoon before I went for my walk.
I had to go down to Sainsbury's to pick up some bits and as I was walking down it was still okay, though you could see the clouds building for a bit of a storm. Well, as I got to Sainsbury's (it's about two miles away) the heavens opened and I got a bit wet but then headed inside and bought the bits I needed.
When I came out it was still pretty heavy, but I hung around and waited for it to dry up. There was then a bit of a break and so I thought I would give it a go at getting back. My route was also quite tree-lined so I was hoping I'd stay fairly sheltered.
Well the first thing was that when the rain came back it was a full-on thunderstorm. I'm not fundamentally afraid of thunderstorms like some are, but I get a bit nervous when I'm out in one. Not from a point of view of being hit by lightning, but if it hits a tree or something nearby. So my route being tree-lined made me quite nervous, especially since my plan to try to avoid getting wet was to shelter under trees.
Now initially the rain wasn't too bad - I've walked in worse and not been fussed. However, it wasn't long before it was absolutely hammering it down. I mean, it was monsoon-like stuff with gobbets of rain hammering down. It was that level of rain where even if you stand under a tree it offers no protection at all as the rain just blasts through.
This step up happened about half-way home and initially I tried to shelter, but it quickly became obvious that I was getting just as wet as if I was still moving. I therefore set off home and got extremely wet.
I was oddly reminiscent of last year, actually, when I also got stuck in a thunderstorm and got soaked. At that time I bought a cheap poncho with the idea of carrying it with me if rain was threatened, but obviously I'd left it at home.
I also doubt if it would have sorted the real issue I had and that was that my relatively new walking shoes filled up with water. The real problem here is that the shoes are too big and I have to wear an extra pair of walking socks (weirdly my shoe size seems to have shrunk with the weight I've lost - I think it may be due to my feet being less wide due to a smaller load being pushed down on them: they're certainly not shorter. However, I think this means there was a route for the water to seep in having run down my legs.
That might seem extreme, but as I say it was a hell of a lot of rain that fell - it was streaming down me and every single part of me was soaked.
Now these shoes are Gore-Tex, which is kinda waterproof, and they obviously have a rubber soul, and these two things meant that the boots actually ended up acting like buckets - I could feel water squishing about in them and when I took them off they were full of water on top of my socks being wringing wet.
I was so wet it took tree full days for everything to dry out having hung it up with the dehumidifier going fairly constantly.
I was therefore rather worried that I might have destroyed this almost new and very expensive boots, but I tried them out this weekend and they seem totally fine. I guess because I dried them out thoroughly they're okay.
On the bank holiday weekend we got some horrible weather on the Saturday afternoon. I'd seen the forecasts, but they were quite vague and the weather in the morning was okay. As I mentioned I worked very late on the Friday so I ended up quite delayed on the Saturday and it was a bit later in the afternoon before I went for my walk.
I had to go down to Sainsbury's to pick up some bits and as I was walking down it was still okay, though you could see the clouds building for a bit of a storm. Well, as I got to Sainsbury's (it's about two miles away) the heavens opened and I got a bit wet but then headed inside and bought the bits I needed.
When I came out it was still pretty heavy, but I hung around and waited for it to dry up. There was then a bit of a break and so I thought I would give it a go at getting back. My route was also quite tree-lined so I was hoping I'd stay fairly sheltered.
Well the first thing was that when the rain came back it was a full-on thunderstorm. I'm not fundamentally afraid of thunderstorms like some are, but I get a bit nervous when I'm out in one. Not from a point of view of being hit by lightning, but if it hits a tree or something nearby. So my route being tree-lined made me quite nervous, especially since my plan to try to avoid getting wet was to shelter under trees.
Now initially the rain wasn't too bad - I've walked in worse and not been fussed. However, it wasn't long before it was absolutely hammering it down. I mean, it was monsoon-like stuff with gobbets of rain hammering down. It was that level of rain where even if you stand under a tree it offers no protection at all as the rain just blasts through.
This step up happened about half-way home and initially I tried to shelter, but it quickly became obvious that I was getting just as wet as if I was still moving. I therefore set off home and got extremely wet.
I was oddly reminiscent of last year, actually, when I also got stuck in a thunderstorm and got soaked. At that time I bought a cheap poncho with the idea of carrying it with me if rain was threatened, but obviously I'd left it at home.
I also doubt if it would have sorted the real issue I had and that was that my relatively new walking shoes filled up with water. The real problem here is that the shoes are too big and I have to wear an extra pair of walking socks (weirdly my shoe size seems to have shrunk with the weight I've lost - I think it may be due to my feet being less wide due to a smaller load being pushed down on them: they're certainly not shorter. However, I think this means there was a route for the water to seep in having run down my legs.
That might seem extreme, but as I say it was a hell of a lot of rain that fell - it was streaming down me and every single part of me was soaked.
Now these shoes are Gore-Tex, which is kinda waterproof, and they obviously have a rubber soul, and these two things meant that the boots actually ended up acting like buckets - I could feel water squishing about in them and when I took them off they were full of water on top of my socks being wringing wet.
I was so wet it took tree full days for everything to dry out having hung it up with the dehumidifier going fairly constantly.
I was therefore rather worried that I might have destroyed this almost new and very expensive boots, but I tried them out this weekend and they seem totally fine. I guess because I dried them out thoroughly they're okay.
Wednesday, 5 September 2012
captain america
Captain America has never really been my thing.
It's obviously quite a jingo-istic thing - I mean, he's not Captain Humanity or Captain United Nations, is he? He's Captain America. And that's always made him very "truth, justice and the American way."
All of which of course works under the assumption that "the American way" is on the same level as truth and justice, and, indeed, that they're somehow synonymous: that truth and justice equal the American way. I was never really convinced that was entirely the case and of course Cap represents those things.
Of course, being the first movie (well, excluding the other adaptation) this one tells Cap's origin story and that revolves around World War 2 and the Red Skull. In this case it also involves HYDRA and a bit of Norse technology. The later obviously ties it to the Thor franchise but the former is interesting.
In the comics HYDRA has always been a fascist organisation, but it never really originated in Nazi Germany. Here it's basically the Red Skull's pet scientific organisation. This works fine enough, especially as they ditch the silly bright costumes and properly retool them as Nazis.
In fact overall I have to say I quite enjoyed the film, despite my reservations. It's just nuanced enough, particularly in regards the whole "representing America" thing that it works. It actually manages to make something of a point in this regard and plays out how you might expect a Captain America to actually be used by the government.
The goodness comes through as being entirely down to him as a person, rather than any sort of jingo-istic thing. However, there is a weird element to it in that it basically has the message that if you're a weakling you can't fight, which seems odd - anyone can be trained up. Also, he seems smart enough, so could he not go into the engineering corps or something?
There is also a weird element that results from this aspect of the film. Clearly they needed both a small version and a big version and it makes more sense that the guy they employ is bigger and they just use digital trickery and other effects to make him look smaller for the first part. This works brilliantly - he really looks good.
What doesn't work is the voice. A bigger person will generally have a deeper voice simply because of how the resonance works. But they didn't adjust his voice at all when he's small, so you have this big deep, manly voice, coming from this little pip-squeak dude and I found it very disconcerting.
But apart from that I actually really enjoyed it.
It's obviously quite a jingo-istic thing - I mean, he's not Captain Humanity or Captain United Nations, is he? He's Captain America. And that's always made him very "truth, justice and the American way."
All of which of course works under the assumption that "the American way" is on the same level as truth and justice, and, indeed, that they're somehow synonymous: that truth and justice equal the American way. I was never really convinced that was entirely the case and of course Cap represents those things.
Of course, being the first movie (well, excluding the other adaptation) this one tells Cap's origin story and that revolves around World War 2 and the Red Skull. In this case it also involves HYDRA and a bit of Norse technology. The later obviously ties it to the Thor franchise but the former is interesting.
In the comics HYDRA has always been a fascist organisation, but it never really originated in Nazi Germany. Here it's basically the Red Skull's pet scientific organisation. This works fine enough, especially as they ditch the silly bright costumes and properly retool them as Nazis.
In fact overall I have to say I quite enjoyed the film, despite my reservations. It's just nuanced enough, particularly in regards the whole "representing America" thing that it works. It actually manages to make something of a point in this regard and plays out how you might expect a Captain America to actually be used by the government.
The goodness comes through as being entirely down to him as a person, rather than any sort of jingo-istic thing. However, there is a weird element to it in that it basically has the message that if you're a weakling you can't fight, which seems odd - anyone can be trained up. Also, he seems smart enough, so could he not go into the engineering corps or something?
There is also a weird element that results from this aspect of the film. Clearly they needed both a small version and a big version and it makes more sense that the guy they employ is bigger and they just use digital trickery and other effects to make him look smaller for the first part. This works brilliantly - he really looks good.
What doesn't work is the voice. A bigger person will generally have a deeper voice simply because of how the resonance works. But they didn't adjust his voice at all when he's small, so you have this big deep, manly voice, coming from this little pip-squeak dude and I found it very disconcerting.
But apart from that I actually really enjoyed it.
Tuesday, 4 September 2012
getting what's due
I've obviously been blogging about my job hunt and its conclusion (staying where I am) so I thought I might give a little update.
The stuff I mentioned last week as to why I hadn't blogged is actually part of the same thing - the stuff I was working on is part of the new arrangement.
This new job (or tweaked job) actually started at the beginning of August but it was only really last week that I was able to start work on it. It went okay for an initial stab, but it really emphasised to me how much there is to be done.
The other thing I wanted to briefly mention about it was that my salary took a big step up (though not as big as if I'd have moved, though as I mentioned there's the possibility of a big slice of cake later). However, I did not receive all I was due when pay came around.
The issue seems to revolve around a part of my salary that's really intended for me to get a company car. At the time we were discussing it I said I liked the idea but I've only just paid off my current car so I'd want a little time before getting a new one. However, in the other job offer this was covered by having a car allowance that is given as part of salary or a car as I saw fit and then adjusted as the circumstances required.
My current company agreed to the same thing, though at a much lower value (but then the other job was in London so I would have had a fair old cost of travel); however, when my pay packet turned up it was short by this exact amount. Now while we're not talking life-changing sums of money, it's not a lump of cash I would want to be without!
I've flagged the issue, but so far it's not been resolved. I guess sometimes these things happen, but I did make it clear when we were in discussions that salary was a big concern, since I'd not had a pay rise in more than 5 years.
The whole thing of capitalism is we're supposed to get money in exchange for out labour.
The stuff I mentioned last week as to why I hadn't blogged is actually part of the same thing - the stuff I was working on is part of the new arrangement.
This new job (or tweaked job) actually started at the beginning of August but it was only really last week that I was able to start work on it. It went okay for an initial stab, but it really emphasised to me how much there is to be done.
The other thing I wanted to briefly mention about it was that my salary took a big step up (though not as big as if I'd have moved, though as I mentioned there's the possibility of a big slice of cake later). However, I did not receive all I was due when pay came around.
The issue seems to revolve around a part of my salary that's really intended for me to get a company car. At the time we were discussing it I said I liked the idea but I've only just paid off my current car so I'd want a little time before getting a new one. However, in the other job offer this was covered by having a car allowance that is given as part of salary or a car as I saw fit and then adjusted as the circumstances required.
My current company agreed to the same thing, though at a much lower value (but then the other job was in London so I would have had a fair old cost of travel); however, when my pay packet turned up it was short by this exact amount. Now while we're not talking life-changing sums of money, it's not a lump of cash I would want to be without!
I've flagged the issue, but so far it's not been resolved. I guess sometimes these things happen, but I did make it clear when we were in discussions that salary was a big concern, since I'd not had a pay rise in more than 5 years.
The whole thing of capitalism is we're supposed to get money in exchange for out labour.
Monday, 3 September 2012
crash, bang wallop
It was the Belgium grand prix this weekend, from the famous Spa Francorchamps circuit.
And it was an incident packed race. I think a route of this was Friday, when it basically rained really hard all day. However, the forecasts also said it was going to be dry for Saturday and Sunday. This meant that the teams had no real motive for doing any running.
Using the Friday practice sessions for testing was basically pointless since they would tend not to get representative results, there was no point setting the car up for a wet race, the drivers weren't going to need any practice for wet driving and being wet meant there was a good chance they'd have an accident which would cause them real headaches.
All of this meant that they really only had the one hour practice session on Saturday morning to set their cars up. This in turn meant that the qualifying session was a bit on the random side - most of the cars you'd expect to be up the front weren't. For example, Vettel and Webber both finished ended up outside the top ten but Kamui Kobayashi in the Sauber was second on the grid.
Not to take anything away from anyone - this year with the stable rules that only really removed the blown diffuser has meant that everyone has been a lot closer - add in the difficult tyres and you have this championship.
The race itself was therefore set up for a lot of battles, since many cars were 'out of position' and Spa is somewhere you can overtake (and not just in the DRS zone). However, unfortunately Romain Grosgean also caused a big accident on the trace down to the first corner.
He's actually a bit of a one for getting into accidents at the start. I think he's actually said that he gets a bit too excited and tends to act a bit rashly. Certainly he was clearly in error on Sunday, as he moved over so far that an accident was almost inevitable.
It was a particular pity on Sunday since he took several of the championship contenders out. It was quite a scary accident actually, as Grosjean's car was lifted into the air (often a consequence of wheels clashing, as here) but because it was a rear wheel he was also spun in the air and of course the cars are a lot longer than they are wide.
You could actually see wheel marks on Alonso's car that were close to where his head is. It's one of the difficulties of open cockpit racing, but then there are always issues over them getting trapped in the cockpit if it's covered - being a close-fitting cockpit, rather than an open space inside a car can cause problems. Especially where fire is always a risk - that's how a lot of drivers used to die in the bad old days.
Anyway, race itself was good and I guess the up-side with Alonso being knocked out is that it closes the championship up a bit.
And we go again this next weekend - there are actually a lot of double-headers until the end of the year, which is going to play havoc with my schedule, but there you go.
And it was an incident packed race. I think a route of this was Friday, when it basically rained really hard all day. However, the forecasts also said it was going to be dry for Saturday and Sunday. This meant that the teams had no real motive for doing any running.
Using the Friday practice sessions for testing was basically pointless since they would tend not to get representative results, there was no point setting the car up for a wet race, the drivers weren't going to need any practice for wet driving and being wet meant there was a good chance they'd have an accident which would cause them real headaches.
All of this meant that they really only had the one hour practice session on Saturday morning to set their cars up. This in turn meant that the qualifying session was a bit on the random side - most of the cars you'd expect to be up the front weren't. For example, Vettel and Webber both finished ended up outside the top ten but Kamui Kobayashi in the Sauber was second on the grid.
Not to take anything away from anyone - this year with the stable rules that only really removed the blown diffuser has meant that everyone has been a lot closer - add in the difficult tyres and you have this championship.
The race itself was therefore set up for a lot of battles, since many cars were 'out of position' and Spa is somewhere you can overtake (and not just in the DRS zone). However, unfortunately Romain Grosgean also caused a big accident on the trace down to the first corner.
He's actually a bit of a one for getting into accidents at the start. I think he's actually said that he gets a bit too excited and tends to act a bit rashly. Certainly he was clearly in error on Sunday, as he moved over so far that an accident was almost inevitable.
It was a particular pity on Sunday since he took several of the championship contenders out. It was quite a scary accident actually, as Grosjean's car was lifted into the air (often a consequence of wheels clashing, as here) but because it was a rear wheel he was also spun in the air and of course the cars are a lot longer than they are wide.
You could actually see wheel marks on Alonso's car that were close to where his head is. It's one of the difficulties of open cockpit racing, but then there are always issues over them getting trapped in the cockpit if it's covered - being a close-fitting cockpit, rather than an open space inside a car can cause problems. Especially where fire is always a risk - that's how a lot of drivers used to die in the bad old days.
Anyway, race itself was good and I guess the up-side with Alonso being knocked out is that it closes the championship up a bit.
And we go again this next weekend - there are actually a lot of double-headers until the end of the year, which is going to play havoc with my schedule, but there you go.
Friday, 31 August 2012
all quiet on the blogging front
Well now, I've been rather silent for the last couple of days.
This wasn't intentional, as such. And it wasn't because I was manically busy - in many senses the opposite. I have been oddly tired, but nothing that would really have stopped me blogging.
It was more a sort of coming together of circumstances.
Firstly, last weekend was the Bank Holiday weekend and I'd initially thought I would have a go at pre-writing a few blog entries over the weekend, as it was going to be quite quiet. That didn't really happen, due to a combination of tiredness (from the long day on Friday) and laziness.
The other thing was that I'd intended for these last few weeks to post a bunch of reviews I'd written but gotten behind with posting. Well, I posted all of those... and then ran out... and didn't write any more.
So writing a few of those reviews would have been ideal for this last couple of days, except as I say I couldn't be bothered over the weekend and then, well, couldn't be bothered during the week either.
During this week, as mentioned, I wasn't busy in the sense that I usually am, with loads of stuff that I have to do with deadlines, etc. However, I was busy with other stuff. I've been tasked with coming up with some bits for work and this was really the first week I've had time to work on them properly, so I took the opportunity.
Now I've been quite enjoying putting them together and that's meant that they've absorbed my time, but as I say, not because I've had to, but more because I've wanted to.
So there you go - a bunch of excuses, basically.
This weekend the Formula 1 season gets back in gear with the Belgium Grand Prix from the iconic Spa Francorchamps. It's usually a good race and the weather often makes its presence felt.
This wasn't intentional, as such. And it wasn't because I was manically busy - in many senses the opposite. I have been oddly tired, but nothing that would really have stopped me blogging.
It was more a sort of coming together of circumstances.
Firstly, last weekend was the Bank Holiday weekend and I'd initially thought I would have a go at pre-writing a few blog entries over the weekend, as it was going to be quite quiet. That didn't really happen, due to a combination of tiredness (from the long day on Friday) and laziness.
The other thing was that I'd intended for these last few weeks to post a bunch of reviews I'd written but gotten behind with posting. Well, I posted all of those... and then ran out... and didn't write any more.
So writing a few of those reviews would have been ideal for this last couple of days, except as I say I couldn't be bothered over the weekend and then, well, couldn't be bothered during the week either.
During this week, as mentioned, I wasn't busy in the sense that I usually am, with loads of stuff that I have to do with deadlines, etc. However, I was busy with other stuff. I've been tasked with coming up with some bits for work and this was really the first week I've had time to work on them properly, so I took the opportunity.
Now I've been quite enjoying putting them together and that's meant that they've absorbed my time, but as I say, not because I've had to, but more because I've wanted to.
So there you go - a bunch of excuses, basically.
This weekend the Formula 1 season gets back in gear with the Belgium Grand Prix from the iconic Spa Francorchamps. It's usually a good race and the weather often makes its presence felt.
Tuesday, 28 August 2012
work, work and more work
So Friday was a bonkers work day.
As I mentioned last week it was my initial intention to come in on Saturday morning and finish off the upload for a bid we were doing. Well, that post was written on Thursday and instead of that I thought I'd try and do it all on Friday.
Initially this meant coming in very early - I started at about 7AM. The morning went okay, with me managing to upload most everything that we had already done, and taking me about 2.5 hours.
However, even if I'd wanted to (and had the time) some of wasn't finished, so wouldn't be available to upload until later.
In the meantime I worked on another bid. That went okay, although it was more work than I'd initially anticipated. It also didn't help that I was pretty tired.
Anyway, I sent that off at about 6PM and so then came my second attempt at the other bid. In case I didn't explain it had to be uploaded via an online portal, which are never the simplest or easiest of things, but the added problem here was it was clear almost everybody had decided to uploaded on the Friday.
That meant that as the day wore on the system basically ground to a halt. A single click of a "yes" button was taking several minutes to even register and start to update and uploading stuff was basically impossible.
I'd hoped that if I left it until early evening then a lot of people would be finished, but that didn't really seem to help matters as it was still crushingly slow at 6PM.
I therefore decided I would go and do other stuff (I bought some petrol, went shopping, had some dinner, went home, put the shopping away, changed clothes and sorted out a few domestic bits in preparation for the weekend) and then come back. This meant I returned to work at about 9PM.
At this time it was actually working well - back to how it had been very early in the morning. However, there was still a lot to upload, so it took me a further hour and a half or so to upload it all. I actually read some manga while I was doing it, so it wasn't too bad.
However, it did mean all told that I didn't get home until well after 11PM - that's quite a work day by anyone's standards!
On top of that, part of the reason I moved my plan to Friday was because we were supposed to be switching to a new server over the Bank Holiday weekend... and it didn't work. So I could have basically done it Saturday or even popped in on Monday!
Anyway, I'm going to try to take it a bit easier this week to compensate a bit for the huge week last week.
As I mentioned last week it was my initial intention to come in on Saturday morning and finish off the upload for a bid we were doing. Well, that post was written on Thursday and instead of that I thought I'd try and do it all on Friday.
Initially this meant coming in very early - I started at about 7AM. The morning went okay, with me managing to upload most everything that we had already done, and taking me about 2.5 hours.
However, even if I'd wanted to (and had the time) some of wasn't finished, so wouldn't be available to upload until later.
In the meantime I worked on another bid. That went okay, although it was more work than I'd initially anticipated. It also didn't help that I was pretty tired.
Anyway, I sent that off at about 6PM and so then came my second attempt at the other bid. In case I didn't explain it had to be uploaded via an online portal, which are never the simplest or easiest of things, but the added problem here was it was clear almost everybody had decided to uploaded on the Friday.
That meant that as the day wore on the system basically ground to a halt. A single click of a "yes" button was taking several minutes to even register and start to update and uploading stuff was basically impossible.
I'd hoped that if I left it until early evening then a lot of people would be finished, but that didn't really seem to help matters as it was still crushingly slow at 6PM.
I therefore decided I would go and do other stuff (I bought some petrol, went shopping, had some dinner, went home, put the shopping away, changed clothes and sorted out a few domestic bits in preparation for the weekend) and then come back. This meant I returned to work at about 9PM.
At this time it was actually working well - back to how it had been very early in the morning. However, there was still a lot to upload, so it took me a further hour and a half or so to upload it all. I actually read some manga while I was doing it, so it wasn't too bad.
However, it did mean all told that I didn't get home until well after 11PM - that's quite a work day by anyone's standards!
On top of that, part of the reason I moved my plan to Friday was because we were supposed to be switching to a new server over the Bank Holiday weekend... and it didn't work. So I could have basically done it Saturday or even popped in on Monday!
Anyway, I'm going to try to take it a bit easier this week to compensate a bit for the huge week last week.
Friday, 24 August 2012
zip it
So I had a bit of an embarrassing situation on Tuesday at work.
Basically to skip to the punch line the zip on my trousers broke. Now we're not talking about an explosion under duress or anything like that - this was that type of breaking where the teeth are undone even though you've zipped the zip.
I'm sure you know the sort of thing - a zip works by the teeth intermeshing, which you achieve by pulling the zipper up or down depending on if you want to close or open them. Well what sometimes happens is that the teeth become un-meshed when the zipper is in the closed position. Basically they become un-aligned and the zip no longer knits them together when it closes.
The way to fix this is to basically slide one set of teeth out of the zipper and re-align everything so that the zipper meshes them together. However, this is only really possible on those zips that are designed to come completely apart (so the zips you have on the front of coats, rather than on the pockets of a coat.
Of course the zipper on my trousers (otherwise known as the "fly") is of the pocket closing type, so I was left with the embarrassing situation of not being able to close my trouser's fly area. I ended up using a bull-dog clip on the inside to close them up.
Now actually this is the pair of trousers that's really slack and it's my intention once I get my new boosted pay packet to start to buy some new clothes. Plus of course I have another pair of work trousers, so it's not a big deal really.
I'd actually gotten rather ahead of myself on that front, expecting my wage to come in during this week for some reason, but of course it will be next week as the end of the month is on Friday.
It's a Bank Holiday Monday next week, so I'll only be blogging Tuesday to Friday. However, I will actually probably be working early Saturday morning, as there's some bits I need to do. It's not that I'm super-mega busy; it's just that I can't see how the timing is going to work out any other way.
Basically to skip to the punch line the zip on my trousers broke. Now we're not talking about an explosion under duress or anything like that - this was that type of breaking where the teeth are undone even though you've zipped the zip.
I'm sure you know the sort of thing - a zip works by the teeth intermeshing, which you achieve by pulling the zipper up or down depending on if you want to close or open them. Well what sometimes happens is that the teeth become un-meshed when the zipper is in the closed position. Basically they become un-aligned and the zip no longer knits them together when it closes.
The way to fix this is to basically slide one set of teeth out of the zipper and re-align everything so that the zipper meshes them together. However, this is only really possible on those zips that are designed to come completely apart (so the zips you have on the front of coats, rather than on the pockets of a coat.
Of course the zipper on my trousers (otherwise known as the "fly") is of the pocket closing type, so I was left with the embarrassing situation of not being able to close my trouser's fly area. I ended up using a bull-dog clip on the inside to close them up.
Now actually this is the pair of trousers that's really slack and it's my intention once I get my new boosted pay packet to start to buy some new clothes. Plus of course I have another pair of work trousers, so it's not a big deal really.
I'd actually gotten rather ahead of myself on that front, expecting my wage to come in during this week for some reason, but of course it will be next week as the end of the month is on Friday.
It's a Bank Holiday Monday next week, so I'll only be blogging Tuesday to Friday. However, I will actually probably be working early Saturday morning, as there's some bits I need to do. It's not that I'm super-mega busy; it's just that I can't see how the timing is going to work out any other way.
Thursday, 23 August 2012
the faculty
I have to confess I found this rather disappointing.
I'd heard that it was quite good, but I actually found it really derivative and therefore rather unoriginal. It was a bit like somebody had compiled together all the good alien movies they'd ever seen and thought that the melded together thing would therefore be good.
Trouble is that you just end up with a diluted version of those original films. Also, generally, a lot of the good alien films are actually based on books. The film tries to acknowledge this debt, but actually just ends up making it obvious how lacking this film is.
This referencing is achieved by having a character who is a science fiction nerd who is into all the classic science fiction films - in this case, alien films being of most reference (Body Snatcher's, Puppet Master's). However, what this also means is you have a rather stereotypical character who lacks any real motivation or defining character, other than being a misfit SF nerd.
And this is the film's real problem - the characters are all basically horrible stereotypes. You've got the wide-eyed new girl, the genius who, unchallenged by academia is a mischief maker, the jock who's misunderstood. It's all just the wrong side of cliché. A bit more exploration of these characters would really have helped.
The good side of the film is the slow takeover by the aliens, which, although very much in a bodysnatcher's vein is reasonably well done. However, even here there are real problems - what are the aliens? Why are they doing this? How do they do it?
There's a vague hint that once taken over the people are happier, but the film also fails to really explore this. And this is one of the most frustrating things about it - it manages to ditch the parts of these types of alien movies that make them quirky or interesting or that make you think.
The aliens basically just take over because that's what they do and they need beating.
The thing about the film that is amusing is seeing a lot of young actors that have gone on to bigger and better things. You've got Josh Hartnett and Elijah Wood, for example. And the performances are probably the highlight of the film.
I'd heard that it was quite good, but I actually found it really derivative and therefore rather unoriginal. It was a bit like somebody had compiled together all the good alien movies they'd ever seen and thought that the melded together thing would therefore be good.
Trouble is that you just end up with a diluted version of those original films. Also, generally, a lot of the good alien films are actually based on books. The film tries to acknowledge this debt, but actually just ends up making it obvious how lacking this film is.
This referencing is achieved by having a character who is a science fiction nerd who is into all the classic science fiction films - in this case, alien films being of most reference (Body Snatcher's, Puppet Master's). However, what this also means is you have a rather stereotypical character who lacks any real motivation or defining character, other than being a misfit SF nerd.
And this is the film's real problem - the characters are all basically horrible stereotypes. You've got the wide-eyed new girl, the genius who, unchallenged by academia is a mischief maker, the jock who's misunderstood. It's all just the wrong side of cliché. A bit more exploration of these characters would really have helped.
The good side of the film is the slow takeover by the aliens, which, although very much in a bodysnatcher's vein is reasonably well done. However, even here there are real problems - what are the aliens? Why are they doing this? How do they do it?
There's a vague hint that once taken over the people are happier, but the film also fails to really explore this. And this is one of the most frustrating things about it - it manages to ditch the parts of these types of alien movies that make them quirky or interesting or that make you think.
The aliens basically just take over because that's what they do and they need beating.
The thing about the film that is amusing is seeing a lot of young actors that have gone on to bigger and better things. You've got Josh Hartnett and Elijah Wood, for example. And the performances are probably the highlight of the film.
Wednesday, 22 August 2012
gantz (movie)
Gantz was always going to be a tough thing to adapt.
Certainly adapting it into a live action film that would need to make a fair old bit of money to cover the types of effects it would need would probably been a tough thing to sell. On the plus side it's a very popular series, but on the down-side it's not exactly family friendly material.
And if you made it family friendly you would stand a real risk of alienating that main fanbase. But still, you need to make it possible that it might appeal to a wider audience. Yet the key elements of gantz are horrible violence, aliens, killing, misogyny general inhumanity and a smidgen of rape on the side. It is, to be frank, a veritable smorgasbord of misanthropy, which is probably something you could get away with better in the anime adaptation, since the audience is more focused in the same area as the manage and the budget concerns smaller.
Anyway, it's hardly fun for all the family!
I was, therefore, not really expecting much from the film adaptation.
I was, however, pleasantly surprised.
They have made changes. The misanthropy is pretty much gone. I mean, there are still a lot of the unpleasant characters, but they're not dwelt on as much. Also, the main character who, in the manga, we get a lot of internal monologue stuff from and therefore we see he's not a particularly nice person, is tweaked to be more normal.
In the film it's more about him being scared about things, rather than not giving a shit, if you see what I mean.
However, this first film (there are two) is actually surprisingly close to the original manga, given the changes that have been made. The second film looks like it diverges more, based on the trailer, but this first one takes the major parts of the manga and retains the majority of them.
I mean it does tweak stuff, obviously, but not as much as you may think.
The film also looks really good. The effects are excellent - the aliens look very good and the suits, guns and gantz itself are all very well executed. I think the fact it's almost all set at night (a lot of the less dramatic stuff front during daytime is what's gone) helps out here - FX are normally easier to execute during the night.
But obviously they've also benefitted from the leaps and bounds of digital FX that mean even low budget films can look very good nowadays
So overall, I'd say it's well worth checking out.
Well, if you like SF, action, aliens or the original manga it's worth checking out - if those aren't really your bag, it's not going to change your mind.
Certainly adapting it into a live action film that would need to make a fair old bit of money to cover the types of effects it would need would probably been a tough thing to sell. On the plus side it's a very popular series, but on the down-side it's not exactly family friendly material.
And if you made it family friendly you would stand a real risk of alienating that main fanbase. But still, you need to make it possible that it might appeal to a wider audience. Yet the key elements of gantz are horrible violence, aliens, killing, misogyny general inhumanity and a smidgen of rape on the side. It is, to be frank, a veritable smorgasbord of misanthropy, which is probably something you could get away with better in the anime adaptation, since the audience is more focused in the same area as the manage and the budget concerns smaller.
Anyway, it's hardly fun for all the family!
I was, therefore, not really expecting much from the film adaptation.
I was, however, pleasantly surprised.
They have made changes. The misanthropy is pretty much gone. I mean, there are still a lot of the unpleasant characters, but they're not dwelt on as much. Also, the main character who, in the manga, we get a lot of internal monologue stuff from and therefore we see he's not a particularly nice person, is tweaked to be more normal.
In the film it's more about him being scared about things, rather than not giving a shit, if you see what I mean.
However, this first film (there are two) is actually surprisingly close to the original manga, given the changes that have been made. The second film looks like it diverges more, based on the trailer, but this first one takes the major parts of the manga and retains the majority of them.
I mean it does tweak stuff, obviously, but not as much as you may think.
The film also looks really good. The effects are excellent - the aliens look very good and the suits, guns and gantz itself are all very well executed. I think the fact it's almost all set at night (a lot of the less dramatic stuff front during daytime is what's gone) helps out here - FX are normally easier to execute during the night.
But obviously they've also benefitted from the leaps and bounds of digital FX that mean even low budget films can look very good nowadays
So overall, I'd say it's well worth checking out.
Well, if you like SF, action, aliens or the original manga it's worth checking out - if those aren't really your bag, it's not going to change your mind.
Tuesday, 21 August 2012
mini heat wave
So we seemed to have a mini heat wave while I was taking my long weekend.
It was nice that it didn't rain on me, but the heat made it a bit unpleasant. It was actually another case of my classic comment on British weather that it comes with exclamation points. I mean the change was so sudden that it was quite a shock.
I have to say I found the whole weather extremely nostalgic.
It was, to coin a phrase, just like the weather we seemed to have when I was a kid. Well, no, actually, not when I was a kid proper, but when I was a teenager. My recollection of my teenage years (around the GCSE and A-level kind of time) was that the weather during the summer was constantly like how it was this last weekend - hot and cloudless during the day and not really properly easing off during the night.
I don't know if that's really an accurate reflection of how the weather actually was, but it's how I remember it. I remember days of going around friends' houses and having barbecues and lazing about and then smoking pot and getting drunk in the evening.
This weather was so reminiscent of that period, particularly as the smell of barbecue was filling the air when I went out for my walks around the estate.
As for other stuff I did it was all pretty unexciting.
I gave the car a thorough clean, including giving it a polish. Usually when I do these mega cleans I find them quite tiring because I do everything and so it take hours, but I also end up using muscles I don't normally use much so I then have several days of aches and pains.
This time I didn't find the doing as tiring, but the after-ache was really bad.
I also decided to do a load of backing up. In the end I did my hard-drive based back-up routine, but didn't get the time to also burn the DVDs I usually do as well. I like to be thoroughly backed-up having had several bad experiences of drives crapping out and taking everything with them.
I'll probably look at burning the DVDs this next bank holiday weekend, though I am currently anticipating I will actually have to work part of the weekend. This isn't so much because I have too much to do it's more because the timing of things other people are doing mean it just won't be finished in time for me to do anything prior to the weekend.
I decided to do the back-up because I actually had a bit of a worrying moment the other week when I plug one of my drives in and it came up as if it was a new disk and asked me to format it. In the end I got around it, though the drive ran incredibly slowly. However, I think looking back on it it was because I used a USB3.0 slot that the motherboard has and I never installed the proper drivers for those slots because I don't have any USB 3.0 peripherals, so it ran at the default USB 1.0 speed.
At least I hope it was that - if not, I've backed it up anyway.
It was nice that it didn't rain on me, but the heat made it a bit unpleasant. It was actually another case of my classic comment on British weather that it comes with exclamation points. I mean the change was so sudden that it was quite a shock.
I have to say I found the whole weather extremely nostalgic.
It was, to coin a phrase, just like the weather we seemed to have when I was a kid. Well, no, actually, not when I was a kid proper, but when I was a teenager. My recollection of my teenage years (around the GCSE and A-level kind of time) was that the weather during the summer was constantly like how it was this last weekend - hot and cloudless during the day and not really properly easing off during the night.
I don't know if that's really an accurate reflection of how the weather actually was, but it's how I remember it. I remember days of going around friends' houses and having barbecues and lazing about and then smoking pot and getting drunk in the evening.
This weather was so reminiscent of that period, particularly as the smell of barbecue was filling the air when I went out for my walks around the estate.
As for other stuff I did it was all pretty unexciting.
I gave the car a thorough clean, including giving it a polish. Usually when I do these mega cleans I find them quite tiring because I do everything and so it take hours, but I also end up using muscles I don't normally use much so I then have several days of aches and pains.
This time I didn't find the doing as tiring, but the after-ache was really bad.
I also decided to do a load of backing up. In the end I did my hard-drive based back-up routine, but didn't get the time to also burn the DVDs I usually do as well. I like to be thoroughly backed-up having had several bad experiences of drives crapping out and taking everything with them.
I'll probably look at burning the DVDs this next bank holiday weekend, though I am currently anticipating I will actually have to work part of the weekend. This isn't so much because I have too much to do it's more because the timing of things other people are doing mean it just won't be finished in time for me to do anything prior to the weekend.
I decided to do the back-up because I actually had a bit of a worrying moment the other week when I plug one of my drives in and it came up as if it was a new disk and asked me to format it. In the end I got around it, though the drive ran incredibly slowly. However, I think looking back on it it was because I used a USB3.0 slot that the motherboard has and I never installed the proper drivers for those slots because I don't have any USB 3.0 peripherals, so it ran at the default USB 1.0 speed.
At least I hope it was that - if not, I've backed it up anyway.
Thursday, 16 August 2012
fuck this shit
I'm in a really bad mood today.
I don't think it's lack of sleep, because I'm not really tired, as such. I mean, I'm a little fatigued, having put in some hefty days at work recently (both time-wise and effort-wise), but I've been sleeping okay.
I think part of it is that people haven't really been doing what I've been asking them to. It's been weird - I think we've agreed something or to do something in a certain way or by a certain time and then they just go and do something else.
I mean, on most of the things I don't mind that they've done it differently or at a different time or whatever, but why agree to what we had agreed if you're going to do something else? Why not just say what you've got in mind?
I just let out a big sign then.
Roll on my long weekend!
I don't think it's lack of sleep, because I'm not really tired, as such. I mean, I'm a little fatigued, having put in some hefty days at work recently (both time-wise and effort-wise), but I've been sleeping okay.
I think part of it is that people haven't really been doing what I've been asking them to. It's been weird - I think we've agreed something or to do something in a certain way or by a certain time and then they just go and do something else.
I mean, on most of the things I don't mind that they've done it differently or at a different time or whatever, but why agree to what we had agreed if you're going to do something else? Why not just say what you've got in mind?
I just let out a big sign then.
Roll on my long weekend!
Wednesday, 15 August 2012
dead snow
You know I really wanted to enjoy this more than I did.
Zombie nazis killing a bunch of kids in a remote, snow-bound cabin? What's not to love?
The problem is it doesn't really make a lot of sense. I know - it's a daft criticism, isn't it? I mean, it's a film about nazi zombies, right? It coudln't possibly make any sense.
Well, no, but there's such a thing as internal logic. Okay, there's no such thing as zombies, but if you're goign to have zombies you need to be consistent about what they are, what they do, how they behave, etc. But there isn't here - most of the zombies seem pretty mindless, but one fo them is made out to be a leader of sorts - well, why is he still vaguely clever and the others aren't?
And if he is meant to be vaguely clever, why is his only motivation to do with some small amount of gold? Gold that it's not clear how it got to be anywhere other than where the zombies left it.
There are loads of other problems too. One f the main ones is a random old bloke who turns up basically in order to tell the youngsters the plot. Quite why he randomly seems to have walked dozens of miles (his tent, which is in the middle of nowhere, even though it's implied he's a local, is shown to be the best part of half a day's snow mobile ride away) just to scare the piss out of these kids with a weird story is never at all clear.
Especially sicne he then gets bumped off in a way that's utterly inconsistent with what we're supposed to believe is the motivation for the zombies.
The effects are generally quite good. There's a hell of a lot of killing and blood and severed body parts.
There's also some nice stabs at humour in an evil dead sort of veign.
But there are problems here too - everythign is derivative or unorigianl. IT's like there's a bit where a guy chops his own arm off... like a cross between Evil Dead (chainsaws and arms) and Braindead (infected arm cut off). Except it's utterly daft that he seems to think this will work. Plus, it's not like it's quick - it takes ages. And all through it the zombies apparantly stand aroudn watching him.
You see what I mean? It's lack of any sense is so blatent that it ruins what should be the bits that make up for the stupid plot. And it's so derivative that you just feel leik you've seen it all before.
Shame, it coudl have been so much better with little to no changes.
There were quite a lot of extras - some of which were quite entertaining. In particular the fact the crew seems to rise up in a proto-communist, trade union kind of thing was quite amusing.
Zombie nazis killing a bunch of kids in a remote, snow-bound cabin? What's not to love?
The problem is it doesn't really make a lot of sense. I know - it's a daft criticism, isn't it? I mean, it's a film about nazi zombies, right? It coudln't possibly make any sense.
Well, no, but there's such a thing as internal logic. Okay, there's no such thing as zombies, but if you're goign to have zombies you need to be consistent about what they are, what they do, how they behave, etc. But there isn't here - most of the zombies seem pretty mindless, but one fo them is made out to be a leader of sorts - well, why is he still vaguely clever and the others aren't?
And if he is meant to be vaguely clever, why is his only motivation to do with some small amount of gold? Gold that it's not clear how it got to be anywhere other than where the zombies left it.
There are loads of other problems too. One f the main ones is a random old bloke who turns up basically in order to tell the youngsters the plot. Quite why he randomly seems to have walked dozens of miles (his tent, which is in the middle of nowhere, even though it's implied he's a local, is shown to be the best part of half a day's snow mobile ride away) just to scare the piss out of these kids with a weird story is never at all clear.
Especially sicne he then gets bumped off in a way that's utterly inconsistent with what we're supposed to believe is the motivation for the zombies.
The effects are generally quite good. There's a hell of a lot of killing and blood and severed body parts.
There's also some nice stabs at humour in an evil dead sort of veign.
But there are problems here too - everythign is derivative or unorigianl. IT's like there's a bit where a guy chops his own arm off... like a cross between Evil Dead (chainsaws and arms) and Braindead (infected arm cut off). Except it's utterly daft that he seems to think this will work. Plus, it's not like it's quick - it takes ages. And all through it the zombies apparantly stand aroudn watching him.
You see what I mean? It's lack of any sense is so blatent that it ruins what should be the bits that make up for the stupid plot. And it's so derivative that you just feel leik you've seen it all before.
Shame, it coudl have been so much better with little to no changes.
There were quite a lot of extras - some of which were quite entertaining. In particular the fact the crew seems to rise up in a proto-communist, trade union kind of thing was quite amusing.
Tuesday, 14 August 2012
how to loose friends and alienate people
Well, this was poor.
Loose friends was actually somethign I listened to as an audiobook and enjoyed quite a lot. It was an odd sort of enjoyment, though.
See, the thing about it was that the person described in the book - Toby Young - was a bit of a prat. But here's the thing - the book was written with sufficient hindsight and self knowledge (by Toby Young himself) that it made it enjoyable.
Young portrays himself during that period as a prat, fully acknowledging his prattishness and making fun of himself. It's not entirely a self piss-take, but there's a definite air of "what the hell was I playing at?" to it that means it's enjoyable.
And it's difficult to see how the book would work without that, because it's also central to the reason he failed in New York. Well, actually, central to both the reason he got the opportunity and then failed was that he wasn't really willing to play the game proper.
He starts off attacking what he loves because he loves it, but then when that thing tries to brign him onboard instead of flipping and playign the game, he does the opposite. But he thinks that bu doing so he will have even more success, where in reality he creates his own failure.
Guess what happens in the film?
Well, for starters, a lot of it is toned down - the attack isn't really there, as such. But also the point of the book is flipped on its head - he flips aroudn and plays the game and has success. But in the film (this isn't really a spoiler, as it's predictably hollywood) he then realises his mistake and gives it all up for love.
It's almost the complete opposite fo what the book was about and therefore it renders the title pointles. They could easily have made this film, called it somethign else and not been sued.
The other problem si that a lot fo the humour descends into the toilet. Now don't get me wrong there's some rudeness and crudeness int he original, but it's liek those are the only bits they wanted to keep. Also, without a lot of the more complicated and interesting things they loose some of their point, so they're just vomit, transvestism and cock & ball jokes.
To be honest, though, it's difficult to see how they would have made a film of the book as it was. At least, it's difficult to see how a reasonable budget Hollywood film would have gotten made without drastic revisions. A small, indipendent film maybe, but a film with the need to get quite a lot of bums in seats to pay for itself? A tough sell.
Loose friends was actually somethign I listened to as an audiobook and enjoyed quite a lot. It was an odd sort of enjoyment, though.
See, the thing about it was that the person described in the book - Toby Young - was a bit of a prat. But here's the thing - the book was written with sufficient hindsight and self knowledge (by Toby Young himself) that it made it enjoyable.
Young portrays himself during that period as a prat, fully acknowledging his prattishness and making fun of himself. It's not entirely a self piss-take, but there's a definite air of "what the hell was I playing at?" to it that means it's enjoyable.
And it's difficult to see how the book would work without that, because it's also central to the reason he failed in New York. Well, actually, central to both the reason he got the opportunity and then failed was that he wasn't really willing to play the game proper.
He starts off attacking what he loves because he loves it, but then when that thing tries to brign him onboard instead of flipping and playign the game, he does the opposite. But he thinks that bu doing so he will have even more success, where in reality he creates his own failure.
Guess what happens in the film?
Well, for starters, a lot of it is toned down - the attack isn't really there, as such. But also the point of the book is flipped on its head - he flips aroudn and plays the game and has success. But in the film (this isn't really a spoiler, as it's predictably hollywood) he then realises his mistake and gives it all up for love.
It's almost the complete opposite fo what the book was about and therefore it renders the title pointles. They could easily have made this film, called it somethign else and not been sued.
The other problem si that a lot fo the humour descends into the toilet. Now don't get me wrong there's some rudeness and crudeness int he original, but it's liek those are the only bits they wanted to keep. Also, without a lot of the more complicated and interesting things they loose some of their point, so they're just vomit, transvestism and cock & ball jokes.
To be honest, though, it's difficult to see how they would have made a film of the book as it was. At least, it's difficult to see how a reasonable budget Hollywood film would have gotten made without drastic revisions. A small, indipendent film maybe, but a film with the need to get quite a lot of bums in seats to pay for itself? A tough sell.
Monday, 13 August 2012
scrappy
It was a bit of a scrappy weekend.
My landlord has gone on yet another of his holidays. Actually, holiday is probably not the right word - can you take a holiday if you're retired? "Break" is probably more apt.
During the winter they often jet off to some exotic part of the world, but in summer they tend to go caravanning. I'm not sure where they're off to this time, but I've a feeling it won't be for as long as they've planned.
This week it's meant to rain and drizzle a bit and they're not very tolerant of bad weather (I know - why do they go caravanning then?) so I'm guessing they'll probably be back by mid-week.
Now I'd actually thought they were going on Monday but they went on Sunday, so I decided I would make use of their going this weekend and the nice weather we were having and clean the car.
As I say there's a fair chance it will be poor weather, so while it was nice I thought it best to give it a clean. Unfortunately I had a bit of a problem with one of the things I did and actually made it dirtier than it was already, so I'll have to buy a better cleaner and try and do it this next weekend (as I say, assuming it doesn't rain) - or maybe we'll get a reasonable evening at some point.
I was also rather fatigued on Sunday as Saturday had taken quite a lot out of me. The thing is, though, I'm not 100% why. I've a feeling it was actually more a case of work draining me during the week and then Saturday just sapping the last of my energy. With it being hot and quite muggy I found my afternoon walk particularly hard work, for example.
But also everything I did seemed to take longer and/or be more difficult than I'd anticipated. So, for example, I did a huge pile of ironing, but it took a lot longer than I was expecting.
So yeah, bit of a scrappy weekend.
This week I am taking Friday off. I'd originally planned to take both Friday and Monday, but with the days I took looking for a new job I have ended up with all Friday and half of Monday off. Either way it means fewer posts for the next few weeks (the week after is also the bank holiday). I'll probably us the opportunity to post a bunch of film reviews and get myself somewhat caught up there too.
My landlord has gone on yet another of his holidays. Actually, holiday is probably not the right word - can you take a holiday if you're retired? "Break" is probably more apt.
During the winter they often jet off to some exotic part of the world, but in summer they tend to go caravanning. I'm not sure where they're off to this time, but I've a feeling it won't be for as long as they've planned.
This week it's meant to rain and drizzle a bit and they're not very tolerant of bad weather (I know - why do they go caravanning then?) so I'm guessing they'll probably be back by mid-week.
Now I'd actually thought they were going on Monday but they went on Sunday, so I decided I would make use of their going this weekend and the nice weather we were having and clean the car.
As I say there's a fair chance it will be poor weather, so while it was nice I thought it best to give it a clean. Unfortunately I had a bit of a problem with one of the things I did and actually made it dirtier than it was already, so I'll have to buy a better cleaner and try and do it this next weekend (as I say, assuming it doesn't rain) - or maybe we'll get a reasonable evening at some point.
I was also rather fatigued on Sunday as Saturday had taken quite a lot out of me. The thing is, though, I'm not 100% why. I've a feeling it was actually more a case of work draining me during the week and then Saturday just sapping the last of my energy. With it being hot and quite muggy I found my afternoon walk particularly hard work, for example.
But also everything I did seemed to take longer and/or be more difficult than I'd anticipated. So, for example, I did a huge pile of ironing, but it took a lot longer than I was expecting.
So yeah, bit of a scrappy weekend.
This week I am taking Friday off. I'd originally planned to take both Friday and Monday, but with the days I took looking for a new job I have ended up with all Friday and half of Monday off. Either way it means fewer posts for the next few weeks (the week after is also the bank holiday). I'll probably us the opportunity to post a bunch of film reviews and get myself somewhat caught up there too.
Friday, 10 August 2012
other pics
I'd actually pre-written the post below and was intending to post it yesterday, but Thursday was absolutely manic so I didn't get the chance.
I mentioned some time back that I figured out how to get photos off my phone, so I thought I'd post the couple of random shots I took with the intention of blogging about. They're now quite old so a bit out of context. Firstly we've got some pictures I took back when the lovely summer of rain was just getting going and we were all surprised at the volume. I think we've become used to it by now.

I should explain this is a bit of road that goes down to an industrial estate and it's not an area that's prone to flooding, but as you can see it's like a small lake. It must have been a good 6 inches deep at least and was essentially the consequence of huge downpours over several days that caused all the drains and rivers to just stop clearing the water. Obviously it's the Queen's Jubilee year and we got the long bank holiday weekend, so by way of "celebration" I decided to make some fairy cakes.

As you can see I made up some red white and blue icing. However, in all honesty the icing wasn't very nice as the icing sugar was quite old so it tasted a little funny.

So if we're celebrating Britain then this must be me celebrating Britain's "multi-culturalism" and not simply because I made 6 cupcakes from the recipe and had three left over and some random bits of dark and white chocolate in the cupboard. These were a lot nicer than the iced ones, obviously as chocolate doesn't go funny if left. On these you can also see that some of the fairy cakes sunk a bit as they had a bit much batter in and when the others were finished these weren't quite set. Still it made a nice sink for me to put more chocolate in!
I mentioned some time back that I figured out how to get photos off my phone, so I thought I'd post the couple of random shots I took with the intention of blogging about. They're now quite old so a bit out of context. Firstly we've got some pictures I took back when the lovely summer of rain was just getting going and we were all surprised at the volume. I think we've become used to it by now.

I should explain this is a bit of road that goes down to an industrial estate and it's not an area that's prone to flooding, but as you can see it's like a small lake. It must have been a good 6 inches deep at least and was essentially the consequence of huge downpours over several days that caused all the drains and rivers to just stop clearing the water. Obviously it's the Queen's Jubilee year and we got the long bank holiday weekend, so by way of "celebration" I decided to make some fairy cakes.

As you can see I made up some red white and blue icing. However, in all honesty the icing wasn't very nice as the icing sugar was quite old so it tasted a little funny.

So if we're celebrating Britain then this must be me celebrating Britain's "multi-culturalism" and not simply because I made 6 cupcakes from the recipe and had three left over and some random bits of dark and white chocolate in the cupboard. These were a lot nicer than the iced ones, obviously as chocolate doesn't go funny if left. On these you can also see that some of the fairy cakes sunk a bit as they had a bit much batter in and when the others were finished these weren't quite set. Still it made a nice sink for me to put more chocolate in!
Wednesday, 8 August 2012
the mechanic
I've generally enjoyed most of the Jason Statham films I've seen.
They're not generally anything more than fairly basic action films, with Statham kicking ass and taking names. He's generally very good at the action stuff and they excel in the fighting and violence, rather than plot.
I have to say, though, that I found the mechanic to be quite poor.
Apparently it's a remake of a Michael Winner film, but I've never seen that so I can't really comment on that side of it. What I would say is that the problem really is the main character, played by Statham.
See, he's not very likeable, which is okay, but he's also most definitely not a proper anti-hero. I mean, his "job" is as an assassin, so he kills people, and it's sort of hinted that he only kills bad people, but this is never clearly stated. So he's a killer, but a killer of bad people.
So that makes him a "good guy", except he's not that either. Being an assassin it's fairly obvious that the plot involves him being used to kill somebody that he shouldn't have or that didn't need to die (it's a wonder assassins don't see this coming). But this really cuts to the heart of the problem.
He's supposed to be this super-efficient, sees everything coming guy, but he just takes the assassination contracts at face value. It's horribly contradictory.
He also weirdly ends up taking an apprentice out of... well, I'm not sure, guilt? It's not entirely clear - the apprentice didn't really want to become an assassin, he just sort of goes along with it.
It's all very random.
But what makes it worse is that where the poor plot would usually be compensated for by lots of action and fight scenes, the film doesn't really have that many. And Statham is only in a handful of them. Also, they're not particularly interesting - either super-efficient, bang you're dead, or horribly messy.
It was all very disappointing.
They're not generally anything more than fairly basic action films, with Statham kicking ass and taking names. He's generally very good at the action stuff and they excel in the fighting and violence, rather than plot.
I have to say, though, that I found the mechanic to be quite poor.
Apparently it's a remake of a Michael Winner film, but I've never seen that so I can't really comment on that side of it. What I would say is that the problem really is the main character, played by Statham.
See, he's not very likeable, which is okay, but he's also most definitely not a proper anti-hero. I mean, his "job" is as an assassin, so he kills people, and it's sort of hinted that he only kills bad people, but this is never clearly stated. So he's a killer, but a killer of bad people.
So that makes him a "good guy", except he's not that either. Being an assassin it's fairly obvious that the plot involves him being used to kill somebody that he shouldn't have or that didn't need to die (it's a wonder assassins don't see this coming). But this really cuts to the heart of the problem.
He's supposed to be this super-efficient, sees everything coming guy, but he just takes the assassination contracts at face value. It's horribly contradictory.
He also weirdly ends up taking an apprentice out of... well, I'm not sure, guilt? It's not entirely clear - the apprentice didn't really want to become an assassin, he just sort of goes along with it.
It's all very random.
But what makes it worse is that where the poor plot would usually be compensated for by lots of action and fight scenes, the film doesn't really have that many. And Statham is only in a handful of them. Also, they're not particularly interesting - either super-efficient, bang you're dead, or horribly messy.
It was all very disappointing.
Tuesday, 7 August 2012
farnborough airshow pics 2
More from farnborough.
The red arrows, obviously. They put on a full display, which was really good to see. It's been ages since I've seen the red arrows do a full display.
The arrows were parked up opposite the Breitling display team who also did a cool display.
It obviously wasn't all military planes there - I like this bulbous nosed guardian. very weird looking.
So here we have the F-15 and F-16. Very recognisable US jets.
The jet nozzles from the F16. If you were stood here with it fired up you'd get a rather heavy tan, rather quickly!
Parked next to them was the F18 Super Hornet. A Super Hornet actually did a display as well - it was impressive, both in terms of volume and manoeuvrability.
Right, unfortunately I've run out of the photos I was able to take with my proper camera. As mentioned, it ran out of juice as it had claimed to be fully charged, but really wasn't. So these remaining photos are all from my phone.
Here's the Chinook from the front - I took this on the way back, having walked all the way up the display.
The Osprey. The rotors are enormous. It's like having two big Chinook rotors stuck on the end of two stubby wings. A bonkers thing.
Another of those civilian aircraft.
A close up of its big old jet engine intake.
The Vulcan. Apparently it costs so much to fly it and it's in need of some serious upgrades, so it's a strong possibility this was the last time it will fly at Farnborough.
The Vulcan was at the very end of the displays, but it actually turned out that where they have all the "chalets" (which are only open on the industry days) there were a few aircraft on display too, including this F35.
Here's the Chinook from the front - I took this on the way back, having walked all the way up the display.
The Osprey. The rotors are enormous. It's like having two big Chinook rotors stuck on the end of two stubby wings. A bonkers thing.
Another of those civilian aircraft.
A close up of its big old jet engine intake.
The Vulcan. Apparently it costs so much to fly it and it's in need of some serious upgrades, so it's a strong possibility this was the last time it will fly at Farnborough.
The Vulcan was at the very end of the displays, but it actually turned out that where they have all the "chalets" (which are only open on the industry days) there were a few aircraft on display too, including this F35.
Monday, 6 August 2012
chillax
It was a pretty quit weekend.
Which, to be honest, suited me down to the ground.
Over the last couple of weeks work has been pretty horrible, as we've been bidding a big framework. I have to say I'm not sure why we're bidding this framework, but bidding it we are and I have ended up with most of the actual effort to do it.
And it's been bloody hard work. Hard work not helped by the fact I've had this horrible cold for the last few weeks. It's finally starting to clear up, although it's still not gone and it's been more than two and a half weeks since I caught it. But then it took several days before it really kicked in, so maybe it's not surprising that it's taken weeks to clear?
The main problem is that it seemed to get into my sinuses, which has made me feel bunged up and left me mouth breathing which then gives me a headache. And as I say, I've been maxed out at work on top so I entered the weekend feeling drained.
In fact I entered Friday feeling drained and made several clear errors. I struggled through and did a bit, but if we worked flexi I would have taken off quite early, I think.
So this weekend I chillaxed.
Well, I say that. I spent Saturday morning cleaning and went on some very long walks that meant by evening on both days I was fit to drop. But that was nice - it was nice to feel tired because of those sorts of things, rather than fatigued because of ill health and work stress.
I also started to attack some of the stuff I've recorded. As I mentioned on Friday I recorded very little in the week, so I was into the recorded stuff quite quickly.
As it happened what I attacked wasn't really the TV shows I've recorded, but the Beethoven "Symphony cycle" that was played at the proms a little while back. It was basically all 9 of Beethoven's symphony and was mostly radio stuff, rather than TV programmes. I'm a bit of a fan of Beethoven.
Being radio I also managed to catch up on a bit of reading. I've gotten behind with a few of the articles and blogs I read and while I'm not fully caught up it was nice to bring some of them up to date.
Chillax is among one of those words that I know quite a lot people hate. I'm fine with them myself - one of the things I love about the English language is its fluid nature and how it absorbs words. I could easily have been an Etymologist as I find it endlessly fascinating.
One I'm slightly more puzzled by is "amazeballs". I think its origin is ironic, but how it's come to be used I'm not sure, particularly as it's actually slightly more complicated to say that amazing.
Which, to be honest, suited me down to the ground.
Over the last couple of weeks work has been pretty horrible, as we've been bidding a big framework. I have to say I'm not sure why we're bidding this framework, but bidding it we are and I have ended up with most of the actual effort to do it.
And it's been bloody hard work. Hard work not helped by the fact I've had this horrible cold for the last few weeks. It's finally starting to clear up, although it's still not gone and it's been more than two and a half weeks since I caught it. But then it took several days before it really kicked in, so maybe it's not surprising that it's taken weeks to clear?
The main problem is that it seemed to get into my sinuses, which has made me feel bunged up and left me mouth breathing which then gives me a headache. And as I say, I've been maxed out at work on top so I entered the weekend feeling drained.
In fact I entered Friday feeling drained and made several clear errors. I struggled through and did a bit, but if we worked flexi I would have taken off quite early, I think.
So this weekend I chillaxed.
Well, I say that. I spent Saturday morning cleaning and went on some very long walks that meant by evening on both days I was fit to drop. But that was nice - it was nice to feel tired because of those sorts of things, rather than fatigued because of ill health and work stress.
I also started to attack some of the stuff I've recorded. As I mentioned on Friday I recorded very little in the week, so I was into the recorded stuff quite quickly.
As it happened what I attacked wasn't really the TV shows I've recorded, but the Beethoven "Symphony cycle" that was played at the proms a little while back. It was basically all 9 of Beethoven's symphony and was mostly radio stuff, rather than TV programmes. I'm a bit of a fan of Beethoven.
Being radio I also managed to catch up on a bit of reading. I've gotten behind with a few of the articles and blogs I read and while I'm not fully caught up it was nice to bring some of them up to date.
Chillax is among one of those words that I know quite a lot people hate. I'm fine with them myself - one of the things I love about the English language is its fluid nature and how it absorbs words. I could easily have been an Etymologist as I find it endlessly fascinating.
One I'm slightly more puzzled by is "amazeballs". I think its origin is ironic, but how it's come to be used I'm not sure, particularly as it's actually slightly more complicated to say that amazing.
Friday, 3 August 2012
thank crunchy it's friday
So I've really felt the impact of the Olympics this last week.
Every week I set up all the programs I want to watch on my PVR and this week it was really quite apparent that actually all the stuff I'm setting up is on the radio. There's maybe been only 2 programs I've recorded this week. Well, I say that, there's Mythbusters on Quest every day, but it's basically all been radio stuff.
This is the first weekend of the four week hiatus for the Grand Prix and after the double header it's now a chance for me to clean the flat. I usually give it a clean every two weeks and at the end of that it's usually clear it really needs it.
When I have to leave it three weeks for the doubleheaders the place is proper filthy. I've tried cleaning anyway when there's a Grand Prix, but it really doesn't work - all the stuff I have to do on top of spending some 10 hours on all the Grand Prix stuff just makes it impractical and a little tiring.
It also kills off any possibility of me doing anything else and means I tend to end up with a full list of other stuff to watch on my PVR. It's better to just leave the cleaning for a week.
Also, the flip-side is that the nature of the double headers usually means that I end up double-cleaning and it's nice to clean when it doesn't really need it.
I'm hoping for some good weather, but it appears to be more of the same rainy, cloudy and not warm but not cold stuff for the weekend. While I had the cold I wasn't really up for doing much walking and I'm afraid I did a fair bit of comfort eating.
My diet has pretty much ground to a halt.
I've not really put anything on, but I've not really lost much either - I'm sort of bimbling along around a constant just under 20 stones weight. It's a lot better than I used to be, but still means I'm obese and my target was to get under the line for simply being fat.
I'd need to lose about 4 stones to get down there, which is less than I've already lost. Trouble is I've sort of slipped back into eating too many bad things. To lose weight I need to go back to the more strict diet I had before.
In theory I could up my exercise too, but there's not a lot more I could do in the time available I have. Certainly the exercise I do is balancing out the extra eating, so cut out that extra and I will start dropping again.
Part of the problem, to be honest, is that I really need some new clothes. The clothes I have are all at the stage of hanging off me. Obviously if I get some more clothes now and lose weight, then those clothes will need replacing, but of course if I stick with my current clothes then it's just going to be even worse.
Thankfully the new pay for my job should relieve my financial situation somewhat and I should be able to afford to buy some new stuff.
Every week I set up all the programs I want to watch on my PVR and this week it was really quite apparent that actually all the stuff I'm setting up is on the radio. There's maybe been only 2 programs I've recorded this week. Well, I say that, there's Mythbusters on Quest every day, but it's basically all been radio stuff.
This is the first weekend of the four week hiatus for the Grand Prix and after the double header it's now a chance for me to clean the flat. I usually give it a clean every two weeks and at the end of that it's usually clear it really needs it.
When I have to leave it three weeks for the doubleheaders the place is proper filthy. I've tried cleaning anyway when there's a Grand Prix, but it really doesn't work - all the stuff I have to do on top of spending some 10 hours on all the Grand Prix stuff just makes it impractical and a little tiring.
It also kills off any possibility of me doing anything else and means I tend to end up with a full list of other stuff to watch on my PVR. It's better to just leave the cleaning for a week.
Also, the flip-side is that the nature of the double headers usually means that I end up double-cleaning and it's nice to clean when it doesn't really need it.
I'm hoping for some good weather, but it appears to be more of the same rainy, cloudy and not warm but not cold stuff for the weekend. While I had the cold I wasn't really up for doing much walking and I'm afraid I did a fair bit of comfort eating.
My diet has pretty much ground to a halt.
I've not really put anything on, but I've not really lost much either - I'm sort of bimbling along around a constant just under 20 stones weight. It's a lot better than I used to be, but still means I'm obese and my target was to get under the line for simply being fat.
I'd need to lose about 4 stones to get down there, which is less than I've already lost. Trouble is I've sort of slipped back into eating too many bad things. To lose weight I need to go back to the more strict diet I had before.
In theory I could up my exercise too, but there's not a lot more I could do in the time available I have. Certainly the exercise I do is balancing out the extra eating, so cut out that extra and I will start dropping again.
Part of the problem, to be honest, is that I really need some new clothes. The clothes I have are all at the stage of hanging off me. Obviously if I get some more clothes now and lose weight, then those clothes will need replacing, but of course if I stick with my current clothes then it's just going to be even worse.
Thankfully the new pay for my job should relieve my financial situation somewhat and I should be able to afford to buy some new stuff.
Thursday, 2 August 2012
farnborough pics 1
So I processed the photos from Farnborough and thought I'd upload a few of them.
This is a UAV (Unmanned Air Vehicle). the weird gold thing on the front is (essentially) a radar.
This thing is a boom for refuelling - it unfurls and is like a basket that the plane that wants to refuel sticks a boom into.
This is a C295, which is a transport type plane. As you can see, it's quite big, but if we look at the next shot...
What this is is the C295 again, which is next to the new Airbus A380, which is the enormous new passenger plane. The C295 actual has a Chinook helicopter in front of it and both together are not as long as the A380.
So this is a cleaner shot of the A380 and you can clearly see it's a double decker.
And mentioning the Chinook, here's a cool shot down the rotor blade.
This beasty is the A400M which I think I'm right in saying is about the biggest cargo plane used by the military. It is a monster (but still smaller than the A380!).
Back end of the A400 and a bit of an arty shot.
And this is a zoom to show the cargo deck of the A400. When carrying troops they actually put two rows of seats (so there are effectively 4 rows of seats down the length of it).
The Virgin Galactic is the space plane that's meant to be so regular people can experience going into space.
Think I'll leave it there for today.
Wednesday, 1 August 2012
infestation
Big bugs is one of those staples of horror films.
I guess it's obvious why - bugs are not on many people's lists of favourite beasties and the bigger they are the more icky they tend to be. So making them really big is an easy way to create a good "bad guy" and of course splatting them is always fun.
Fun is the real order of the day here - infestation is definitely a low-budget horror, but it's the great sense of fun that really carries the film. I mean, there's not much here that's really original, but it keeps up enough of a sense of what it is that you're happy to go along for the ride.
Saying that there are a few interesting things in there. In particular the film starts very normally and the switch to the big bug stuff is very quickly and cleverly done. It also gives rise to a situation where our hero is very much a hero by accident. I mean, he rises to the occasion in the end, but it's just random chance that puts him into the situation he finds himself in.
The characters are just on the right side of cliché. You've mostly seen them before and you know what they're about, but you get enough of a flavour that they're proper characters to engage with them. It has a feel of being what you'd expect to actually happen if an apocalypse happened.
The sort of people you'd encounter would end up being pretty random - especially with how this works out. The hero essentially revives people and of course if you were in town on any particular day the sort of people around you could be anybody.
The effects are quite good. It's low budget, but nowadays they can do great things with both prosthetics and computer graphics even on tiny budgets so it really doesn't look bad at all.
One thing I would say is that the ending is a little frustrating. It's clear it was set up as being for a sequel, but it's very open ended. It's not quite clear what that sequel would be and the ending is therefore a little frustrating. Particularly in light of the fact there isn't a sequel.
You know I don't really have a lot else to say about the film, other than that it's well worth checking out if you fancy a bit of big bug action.
I guess it's obvious why - bugs are not on many people's lists of favourite beasties and the bigger they are the more icky they tend to be. So making them really big is an easy way to create a good "bad guy" and of course splatting them is always fun.
Fun is the real order of the day here - infestation is definitely a low-budget horror, but it's the great sense of fun that really carries the film. I mean, there's not much here that's really original, but it keeps up enough of a sense of what it is that you're happy to go along for the ride.
Saying that there are a few interesting things in there. In particular the film starts very normally and the switch to the big bug stuff is very quickly and cleverly done. It also gives rise to a situation where our hero is very much a hero by accident. I mean, he rises to the occasion in the end, but it's just random chance that puts him into the situation he finds himself in.
The characters are just on the right side of cliché. You've mostly seen them before and you know what they're about, but you get enough of a flavour that they're proper characters to engage with them. It has a feel of being what you'd expect to actually happen if an apocalypse happened.
The sort of people you'd encounter would end up being pretty random - especially with how this works out. The hero essentially revives people and of course if you were in town on any particular day the sort of people around you could be anybody.
The effects are quite good. It's low budget, but nowadays they can do great things with both prosthetics and computer graphics even on tiny budgets so it really doesn't look bad at all.
One thing I would say is that the ending is a little frustrating. It's clear it was set up as being for a sequel, but it's very open ended. It's not quite clear what that sequel would be and the ending is therefore a little frustrating. Particularly in light of the fact there isn't a sequel.
You know I don't really have a lot else to say about the film, other than that it's well worth checking out if you fancy a bit of big bug action.
Tuesday, 31 July 2012
olympics opening ceremony
So I watched the Olympics opening ceremony.
Well, I actually recorded it and then watched it the next day. The original ceremony lasted something like 3 and a half or four hours, but I only spent about an hour watching it. The reason for that was that I skipped through a lot of it and also had a lot of it on fast forward.
The bits I skipped entirely were the parade of nations and the speeches. The first seemed to take hours, which isn't surprising, I guess, since there are something like 200 and odd nations taking part. The speeches I just didn't really care, but it also felt like a great big comma in the whole thing.
I have to confess I also fast forwarded a lot of the first segment. It all seemed to take a bit too long for me and also there was a lot of dancing in what I felt was a sort of Andrew Lloyd Webber musical style. I think this stuff was probably a lot better if you were there.
One of the good things about watching on TV is that you can get close ups. If you're there you might not see things that close up (unless you have binoculars or a camera with a zoom lense). However, the down-side is that you have to look at what they show you. When you're there you can focus on the bits that interest you.
The very first section was a big "pastoral idle" that was then transformed into a kind of industrial landscape. The idea of the whole ceremony was to present a lot of British cultural stuff, so obviously the theme there was the industrial revolution. But I had a couple of problems with it.
Firstly I think the impression was supposed to be how nice the pastoral stuff was and how grimy and oppressive the industrial stuff was. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the industrial revolution was a barrel of laughs but the country life pre-industrial revolution wasn't exactly a happy fun-time.
Also, this whole section lasted far too long for me. However, the end of it, which was a clever introduction of the rings and a very striking image of the rings showering sparks was good. It also kicked off some stuff I enjoyed a bit more.
As I say, the whole thing was about presenting Britain and British culture and on that front I don't know how a lot of the stuff would have been understood outside of Britain. A lot of it was quite subtle and specific. For example, I don't know how well known the Eastenders splash screen is - would people from China know what the hell that was referencing?
However, I don't want to give the impression I thought it was bad. There was a lot of stuff I really liked, especially the use of music. There was also a great segment where it was about children's literature, which was really clever. Also the NHS was a nice thing to pay tribute to - the whole idea of the welfare state is a truly great British idea.
There was also a good amount of humour with Rowan Atkinson and the whole Bond thing being obvious highlights.
So overall I'd say it was good, although I'm glad I recorded it and watched it later. Danny Boyle did a really good job.
Well, I actually recorded it and then watched it the next day. The original ceremony lasted something like 3 and a half or four hours, but I only spent about an hour watching it. The reason for that was that I skipped through a lot of it and also had a lot of it on fast forward.
The bits I skipped entirely were the parade of nations and the speeches. The first seemed to take hours, which isn't surprising, I guess, since there are something like 200 and odd nations taking part. The speeches I just didn't really care, but it also felt like a great big comma in the whole thing.
I have to confess I also fast forwarded a lot of the first segment. It all seemed to take a bit too long for me and also there was a lot of dancing in what I felt was a sort of Andrew Lloyd Webber musical style. I think this stuff was probably a lot better if you were there.
One of the good things about watching on TV is that you can get close ups. If you're there you might not see things that close up (unless you have binoculars or a camera with a zoom lense). However, the down-side is that you have to look at what they show you. When you're there you can focus on the bits that interest you.
The very first section was a big "pastoral idle" that was then transformed into a kind of industrial landscape. The idea of the whole ceremony was to present a lot of British cultural stuff, so obviously the theme there was the industrial revolution. But I had a couple of problems with it.
Firstly I think the impression was supposed to be how nice the pastoral stuff was and how grimy and oppressive the industrial stuff was. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the industrial revolution was a barrel of laughs but the country life pre-industrial revolution wasn't exactly a happy fun-time.
Also, this whole section lasted far too long for me. However, the end of it, which was a clever introduction of the rings and a very striking image of the rings showering sparks was good. It also kicked off some stuff I enjoyed a bit more.
As I say, the whole thing was about presenting Britain and British culture and on that front I don't know how a lot of the stuff would have been understood outside of Britain. A lot of it was quite subtle and specific. For example, I don't know how well known the Eastenders splash screen is - would people from China know what the hell that was referencing?
However, I don't want to give the impression I thought it was bad. There was a lot of stuff I really liked, especially the use of music. There was also a great segment where it was about children's literature, which was really clever. Also the NHS was a nice thing to pay tribute to - the whole idea of the welfare state is a truly great British idea.
There was also a good amount of humour with Rowan Atkinson and the whole Bond thing being obvious highlights.
So overall I'd say it was good, although I'm glad I recorded it and watched it later. Danny Boyle did a really good job.
Monday, 30 July 2012
hungarian gp
This cold seems to be hanging around longer than normal.
I don't feel bad, as such, but I still have a snotty nose and a bit of a cough. It gets a bit better every day, but it's gotten to the point of just being annoying now.
It was the Hungarian Grand Prix this weekend.
It wasn't very exciting.
I mean, Lewis won and the Lotus's look particularly strong, with both finishing in the top three, but in terms of the actual race, very little really happened.
Apparently it's quite a fun circuit to drive and the spectators get quite a good view, but the circuit has a tendency to produce dull races. On paper it does have some things to it that should make it enjoyable - it's quite short and there are quite a few sharp bends, including a couple of hairpins, for example. But the trouble is for these to be effective overtaking spots you really need a good long straight beforehand for the cars to build up speed on. This is particularly true where there are big bends that follow technical bits where drivers may make mistakes.
The main outcome of the race is probably to make the championship a bit closer. Alonso is still quite a way ahead, but there's now a clutch of 4 drivers who could all potentially catch him. However, it would probably take a spate of unreliability or lack of performance for Alonso for that to be likely.
There's also a very good chance, given the way the season has so far tended to play out that those drivers will actually all squabble over sins and second places, effectively taking points off each other. That happened in the last couple of seasons and was a big part of why Vettel won.
It's now the big august break, when the teams are required to have two weeks where they close the factories and everyone takes a break. It generally results in more than two weeks without races, though.
While it's good for me as it'll give me a chance to catch up, I have to say this year it would probably be better if they didn't have it. The races will stretch out until November this year, and it's a bit silly if I'm honest. Particularly as we'll probably start up again in March.
I don't feel bad, as such, but I still have a snotty nose and a bit of a cough. It gets a bit better every day, but it's gotten to the point of just being annoying now.
It was the Hungarian Grand Prix this weekend.
It wasn't very exciting.
I mean, Lewis won and the Lotus's look particularly strong, with both finishing in the top three, but in terms of the actual race, very little really happened.
Apparently it's quite a fun circuit to drive and the spectators get quite a good view, but the circuit has a tendency to produce dull races. On paper it does have some things to it that should make it enjoyable - it's quite short and there are quite a few sharp bends, including a couple of hairpins, for example. But the trouble is for these to be effective overtaking spots you really need a good long straight beforehand for the cars to build up speed on. This is particularly true where there are big bends that follow technical bits where drivers may make mistakes.
The main outcome of the race is probably to make the championship a bit closer. Alonso is still quite a way ahead, but there's now a clutch of 4 drivers who could all potentially catch him. However, it would probably take a spate of unreliability or lack of performance for Alonso for that to be likely.
There's also a very good chance, given the way the season has so far tended to play out that those drivers will actually all squabble over sins and second places, effectively taking points off each other. That happened in the last couple of seasons and was a big part of why Vettel won.
It's now the big august break, when the teams are required to have two weeks where they close the factories and everyone takes a break. It generally results in more than two weeks without races, though.
While it's good for me as it'll give me a chance to catch up, I have to say this year it would probably be better if they didn't have it. The races will stretch out until November this year, and it's a bit silly if I'm honest. Particularly as we'll probably start up again in March.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)